Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/827,675

SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 07, 2024
Examiner
BUI, HUNG S
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kioxia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1430 granted / 1638 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1656
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.8%
-0.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1638 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed on 09/07/2024; 02/27/2025; and 01/28/2026 have been considered and made of record. Oath/Declaration The oath/declaration filed on 11/08/2024 is acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. [US 2016/0050744]. Regarding claim 1, Lee et al., disclose a semiconductor storage device (100, figures 1-10A-D) comprising: a first board (110, figure 1B) including a first surface (110T, figure 1B) and a second surface (110B, figure 1B), the second surface being on a side opposite to the first surface (figure 1B); a molded resin (140, figure 1B) covering the first surface when viewed in a thickness direction (a vertical direction, figure 1B) of the first board; and a memory chip (120, figure 1B) between the first surface and the molded resin, wherein the first board includes a terminal (115S, 115G, 115G, figure 1B), the terminal being on the second surface, the terminal being exposed to the outside (115S, 115G, 115P, figure 1B), and the terminal includes a first non-planar portion (a bottom surface of the printed circuit board is not planar surface, figure 1B), the first non-planar portion includes at least one of a plurality of recesses (a plurality of recess to hold a plurality of conductive pads 115, figure 1B) and a plurality of protrusions (a plurality of 119b, figure 1B), the first non-planar portion includes a first recessed portion (at least one right recess to disposed a conductive pad 115S, figure 1B) and a first protruding portion (119b, figure 1B), and the first recessed portion and the first protruding portion are aligned alternately on the first non-planar portion (a bottom surface of the printed circuit board 110, figure 1B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al., in view of ISHIMURA [WO 2023026510]. Regarding claim 2, Lee et al., disclose the claimed invention except for wherein the semiconductor storage device is detachably attachable to a socket connector on a second board of a host device. ISHIMURA discloses a semiconductor memory device (10, figures 1-15) is detachably attachable to a socket connector (50, figures 3-5) on a second board (40, figures 3-5) of a host device (figures 3-5). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use a semiconductor device of Lee et al., with a socket connector of a host computer, as suggested by ISHIMURA, for the purpose of enabling rapid read/write access to data and applications in a host computer. Regarding claim 3, Lee et al., disclose the claimed invention except for wherein the semiconductor storage device is detachably attachable to the connector in a state in which a contact pin of the connector is in contact with the terminal. ISHIMURA further discloses wherein the semiconductor storage device is detachably attachable to the connector in a state in which a contact pin (51/52/53/54, figures 3-5) of the connector is in contact with the terminal (P1/P2/P3/P4, figures 3-5). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use a plurality of pins disposed within a socket connector of a host computer of ISHIMURA, and wherein the plurality of pins are contacted to their corresponding terminals of a semiconductor memory device of Lee et al., in order to provide electrical connections between a semiconductor memory device and a host computer’s socket connector. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. Regarding claim 17, Lee et al., disclose wherein the first board (110, figure 1B) includes a surface layer portion (119b, figure 1B), the surface layer portion is a surface layer portion forming the second surface (110B, figure 1B), the surface layer portion includes a conductive pattern including the terminal (115S, 115G, 115G, figure 1B), the surface layer portion includes an insulating layer covering a part of the conductive pattern, and the terminal includes a first non-planar portion (a bottom surface of the printed circuit board is not planar surface, figure 1B), the first non-planar portion includes a first recessed portion (at least one right recess to disposed a conductive pad 115S, figure 1B) and a first protruding portion (119b, figure 1B), and the first recessed portion and the first protruding portion are aligned alternately on the first non-planar portion (a bottom surface of the printed circuit board 110, figure 1B). Lee et al., disclose the claimed invention except for the surface layer portion includes a third non-planar portion in a region outside the terminal, the third non-planar portion includes at least one of a plurality of recesses and a plurality of protrusions, the third non-planar portion includes a third recessed portion and a third protruding portion, and the third recessed portion and the third protruding portion are aligned alternately on the third non-planar portion. It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to set a first non-planar portion in a region outside the terminal of a semiconductor memory device of Lee et al., in order to provide additional terminal contacts on the semiconductor memory device for increased density and/or enhanced input/output capabilities, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co. 193 USPQ 8. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The claim 4 discloses the combination features of “wherein the contact pin includes a curved portion, the curved portion is at a distal end part of the contact pin and is curved toward a side opposite to the terminal, the terminal includes a first region and a second region, when viewed in a thickness direction of the first board, the first region has at least a part overlapping the curved portion the second region is outside the first region, and the first non-planar portion is at least in the second region.” These features, in conjunction with other features, as claimed in the combination features of the claims 3, 2 and 1, were neither found to be disclosed, nor suggested by the prior art of records. Claims 5-16 depend on the allowed claim 4. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: SATO [US 2023/0091779] discloses memory card and memory system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Hung S. Bui whose telephone number is (571)272-2102. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F: 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen L. Parker can be reached on (303) 297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center. for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNG S. BUI/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2841 /Hung S. Bui/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841 02/04/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600236
VEHICLE MONITOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598711
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598712
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS HAVING LIQUID-PROOF STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598717
Modular Construction with LED Screen
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593412
ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1638 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month