Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/827,821

SECURITY FEATURES AND ANTI-COUNTERFEITING AND PART TRACKING SYSTEM FOR 3D PRINTED PARTS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 08, 2024
Examiner
GRACE, KELSEY C
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Orange Maker LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
240 granted / 296 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 296 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 states “alternatively” then lists i, followed by “or” ii, and iii, followed by “or” before iv with an additional “or” before v., and this statement indicates that the invention is different from what is defined in the claims because a person of ordinary skill in the art would not be able to determine which of the “alternatives” need to be included and which do not. One could interpret that i or ii & iii or iv or v could be chosen, or there is typo and there should be “or” after ii and it should not be combined with iii. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claim 1 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Kwon, et al. (US 2012/0028834). Kwon discloses a color encoding method where a liquid composition filled with magnetic nanoparticles ([0004]) (a method of producing an encoded three-dimensional object produced by additive manufacturing procedures) wherein the magnetic nanoparticles inside a three-dimensional network structure ([0033]) with color encoded magnetic structure for identification ([0053]) (said encoding is provided by embedding in the three dimensional object one or more encoding materials that provide an identifiable signature unique to the specific object produced), the decoding of an encoded particle used for identification with a probe ([0056]) (said identifiable signature providing information to a user regarding the manufacture of said three dimensional object), comprising: the encoding materials come in one of four possibilities for each R, G, B value, which is measured for positioning ([0056]) (a. selecting one or more encoding materials having a measurable characteristic, said characteristic being measurable after construction of the three-dimensional object), b. alternatively material with nanoparticles dispersed in the material ([0005]) (i. adding the one or more encoding materials to an additive manufacturing build material before constructing the three-dimensional object, or ii. adding the one or more encoding materials to the additive manufacturing build material during or after dispensing iii. the one or more encoding materials to an additive manufacturing build material, or iv. adding the one or more encoding materials to an additive manufacturing build material before constructing the three-dimensional object and adding the one or more encoding materials to the additive manufacturing build material during or after dispensing the one or more encoding materials to an additive manufacturing build material, or v. or adding the one or more encoding materials to selected portions of the three- dimensional object after formation of the three dimensional object and applying a magnetic field to the composition to align the nanoparticles and applying an energy source to solidify the composition ([0004]-[0005]) (c. if the encoding material requires activating or aligning, activating or aligning the encoding material before the build material solidifies). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KELSEY C GRACE whose telephone number is (571)270-1113. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST, Friday 7:00 AM - 11:00 AM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at (571)272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KELSEY C. GRACE Examiner Art Unit 1742 /CHRISTINA A JOHNSON/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595346
POLYOLEFIN-BASED COMPOSITION FOR A LID AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12528242
METHOD FOR PRODUCING RESIN VESSEL MADE OF RESIN, MOULD UNIT AND MOULDING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12478485
PREPARATION METHOD OF A HIP JOINT BONE CEMENT PLACEHOLDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12453390
REMOVEABLE HELMET COVER AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Patent 12441658
NON-HYDRATION STRENGTH IN CEMENTITIOUS COMPOSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 14, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 296 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month