Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/828,314

REVERSIBLE CONTOURED PEDALS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Examiner
JOHNSON, VICKY A
Art Unit
3617
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Intoworld LLC Dba Bike Different
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
854 granted / 1070 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1105
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§102
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§112
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1070 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Okajima et al (US 6,647,826). Okajima et al disclose a bicycle pedal comprising: a pedal block (10) having an elongated quasi-cuboid structure characterized by (i) a first foot-contacting surface (top, see Fig 1) on one face having a first front end and a first back end (left side, right side, see Fig 1), (ii) a second foot-contacting surface (bottom, see Fig 1) on an opposite face having a second front end and a second back end (right side, left side, see Fig 1); and (iii) a longitudinal axis, a length whose extent substantially parallels the longitudinal axis (see Fig 2), and a width whose extent is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis (see Fig 2); and a pedal spindle (16) disposed in the pedal block (10) between the first foot-contacting surface and the second foot-contacting surface (see Fig 8), substantially parallel to the width; the pedal spindle comprising an axle and a crank attachment (22) and being configured such that, when the crank attachment (22) is fixedly coupled to a bicycle crank arm (14), the pedal block (10) can freely rotate about the pedal spindle (16); wherein the first foot-contacting surface and the second foot-contacting surface are each contoured to contact a substantial portion of a foot of a rider whose foot is disposed on either the first foot-contacting surface or the second foot-contacting surface (see Fig 1); and wherein the first front end is disposed opposite the second back end, and the first back end is disposed opposite the second front end (see Fig 1). Re claim 2, the first foot-contacting surface is contoured, relative to a planar surface, to have, moving from the first front end to the first back end, a rise, a dip and an arch support; the rise, the dip and the arch support configured to correspond, respectively, to toes, metatarsals and arch of the foot (see Fig 1). Re claim 3, a front half of the first foot-contacting surface is characterized by an average front width, a back half of the first foot-contacting surface is characterized by an average back width, and the average front width is greater than the average back width (see Fig 1). Re claim 4 the first foot-contacting surface and the second foot-contacting surface have matching surface contours (see Fig 1). Re claim 5, the first foot-contacting surface and the second foot-contacting surface have different surface contours (see Fig 2). Re claim 19, Okajima et al disclose a pedal conversion kit comprising: a first pedal block (10)and a second pedal block (col.4 lines 39-42); wherein each of the first pedal block and second pedal block has (i) an elongated quasi-cuboid structure characterized by (A) a first foot-contacting surface on one face having a first front end and a first back end (see Fig 1), (B) a second foot-contacting surface on an opposite face having a second front end and a second back end (see Fig 1); (C) a longitudinal axis, a length whose extent substantially parallels the longitudinal axis (see Fig 3), and a width whose extent is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis (see Fig 3); and (ii) a pedal spindle (16) disposed between the first foot-contacting surface and the second foot-contacting surface (see Fig 8), substantially parallel to the width (see Fig 3);wherein the first front end is disposed opposite the second back end, and the first back end is disposed opposite the second front end (see Fig 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 18 is allowed. Claims 7-17, 20, and 21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Upon further consideration, the recited limitations of canceled claim 6 are not deemed allowable. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICKY A JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7106. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John R Olszewski can be reached at 571-272-2706. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VICKY A JOHNSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 04, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601369
Modular Cable Replacement
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601389
PNEUMATIC-LIQUID AUTO-BALANCE ACTUATOR WITH LARGE DIAMETER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595917
CONTROL UNIT AND COOKING APPLIANCE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596392
PEDAL ASSEMBLIES INCLUDING REDUNDANT SENSING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589828
ELECTRIC MODULE FOR BICYCLE, BICYCLE TIRE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND TIRE CONDITION DIAGNOSIS METHOD OF BICYCLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1070 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month