Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/828,386

APPARATUS FOR TURNING AND POSITIONING A PATIENT WITH SENSOR ELEMENTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Priority
Jul 12, 2021 — provisional 63/220,847 +1 more
Examiner
DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sage Products LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
988 granted / 1155 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1177
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1155 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTIONAcknowledgment is made of applicant’s amendment filed 5/18/26.Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 6 and 14 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Drennan et al. (2017/0281073, hereinafter Drennan) in view of Everett et al. (9,778,131, hereinafter Everett). Regarding claim 1, Drennan discloses an apparatus comprising a body 10 having a first surface comprising a high-friction material, the first surface being configured to adhere to a patient, and a second surface comprising a low-friction material, a pad 14 housed in the body, the pad being configured to deform in response to a pressure applied to the body, and a plurality of sensors 22 housed in the body, the sensors being configured to sense the pressure applied to the body (See Fig. 2, See Pg. 3, Paras. 0045 - 0047 and Pg. 4, Paras. 0048 and 0051). Drennan fails to disclose a wire coupled to at least one sensor of the sensors, the wire extends from the at least one sensor to and past an outer perimeter of the sensor. However, Everett discloses an apparatus comprising a body 20 having surfaces, a pad 32 located in the body, and at least one sensor 40 located in the body, wherein a wire 36 (leads 362, 364 in Fig. 10, wire 436 in Fig. 11) is coupled to and extends from the at least one sensor to and past an outer perimeter of the sensor (See Figs. 1, 10 and 11, See Col. 6, lines 51 – 67, Col. 7, lines 50 – 61, Col. 13, lines 66 – 67 and Col. 14, lines 1 – 7). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Drennan according to the teachings of Everett for the purpose of, advantageously providing an improved device since this type of device is used with accuracy on a variety of surfaces on an individual's body and which can be used under a variety of conditions (See Everett, Col. 1, lines 40 - 59). Regarding claim 2, in Drennan, the body 10 further comprises an insulating material (See Pg. 3, Paras. 0045 - 0047 and Pg. 4, Paras. 0048 and 0051). Regarding claim 3, in Drennan, the body 10 further comprises a base (62, 78, 118-skin or liner of patient), the second surface is coupled to the base, and the first surface is removably coupled to the base (See Figs. 7, 8 and 10). Regarding claim 4, in Drennan, the first surface is configured to be adhered to the patient for a predetermined period of time (See Pg. 2, Para. 0045). Regarding claim 5, in Drennan, the pad 14 comprises a foam that is compressible (See Pg. 3, Para. 0046). Regarding claim 6, in Drennan, the sensors 22 comprise a patient sensor that detects the pressure applied to the pad and a change in rotational geometry of the pad (See Pg. 4, Paras. 0048, 0059 and 0060). Regarding claim 14, in Drennan, the pad 14 comprises a foam that is compressible and the sensors 22 comprise a patient sensor that detects the pressure applied to the pad, and a change in rotational geometry of the pad (See Pg. 3, Para. 0046 and Pg. 4, Paras. 0048, 0059 and 0060). Regarding claim 15, in Drennan, the body 10 further comprises an insulating material (See Pg. 3, Paras. 0045 - 0047 and Pg. 4, Paras. 0048 and 0051). Regarding claim 16, in Drennan, the body 10 further comprises a base (62, 78, 118-skin or liner of patient), the second surface is coupled to the base, and the first surface is removably coupled to the base (See Figs. 7, 8 and 10). Regarding claim 17, in Drennan, the body 10 is round (See Fig. 2). Regarding claim 18, Drennan fails to disclose that the body is heart shaped. However, Everett discloses an apparatus comprising a bandage and pressure data acquisition assembly 211 (See Fig. 8) comprising a bandage (body) 220 having a heart shape, the bandage including an adhesive portion 226 for adhering to a target surface of an individual and a pressure sensor 240 (See Col. 6, lines 16 - 39, Col. 7, lines 12 - 21, Col. 11, lines 20 - 37, Col. 13, lines 15 - 18 and Col. 16, lines 46 - 58). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Drennan according to the teachings of Everett for the purpose of, advantageously providing an improved device since this type of device is used with accuracy on a variety of surfaces on an individual's body and which can be used under a variety of conditions (See Everett, Col. 1, lines 40 - 59). Regarding claim 19, in Drenna, the at least one sensor 22 is disposed at a center of the body (See Fig. 2). Regarding claim 20, Drennan fails to disclose that the wire is configured to communicate output data of the at least one sensor. However, in Everett, the wire 36 is configured to communicate output data of the at least one sensor (See Fig. 1, See Col. 6, lines 59 – 65). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Drennan according to the teachings of Everett for the purpose of, advantageously providing an improved device since this type of device is used with accuracy on a variety of surfaces on an individual's body and which can be used under a variety of conditions (See Everett, Col. 1, lines 40 - 59). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, on Pg. 11, Paras. 1 and Pg. 12, Paras. 1 and 2, with respect to these claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. In response to applicant’s arguments that the references do not disclose a wire that extends from the at least one sensor to and past an outer perimeter of the body, after further consideration, it is the examiner’s position that in Everett, a body 20 comprises surfaces, a pad 32 is located in the body, and at least one sensor 40 is located in the body, wherein a wire 36 (leads 362, 364 in Fig. 10, wire 436 in Fig. 11) is coupled to and extends from the at least one sensor to and past an outer perimeter of the sensor (See Figs. 1, 10 and 11, See Col. 6, lines 51 – 67, Col. 7, lines 50 – 61, Col. 13, lines 66 – 67 and Col. 14, lines 1 – 7), thus the reference still stands. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Brownhill et al. (2020/0214637) disclose positioning of sensors for sensor enabled wound monitoring or therapy. Gowans et al. (CN111093726) disclose a sensor locating wound monitoring or treatment of the implementation of a sensor. Brownhill et al. (2019/0290496) disclose a sensor enabled wound monitoring and therapy apparatus. Zang et al. (CN108403352) disclose an intelligent anti-pressure sore nursing mat. Silver et al. (CN108136192) disclose a dual sensor electrode for providing resuscitation feedback enhanced. Drennan et al. (8,535,246) disclose a system and method of reducing risk and/or severity of pressure ulcers.7. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2176. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at 5712724107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 8/28/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 11, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 18, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730021
SOFT FORCE SENSOR
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730020
TACTILE SENSOR AND APPARATUS INCLUDING TACTILE SENSOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730036
CORDLESS SPRING-SYSTEM CURTAIN INSPECTION DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723935
SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR SHEAR FORCE ESTIMATION WITH OFF-AXIS MEMBRANE PRESSURE MEASUREMENT
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723951
METHOD AND CONTROLLER FOR TESTING A TWO-PHASE COOLING DEVICE, COMPUTER PROGRAM, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1155 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month