Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/828,464

FLEXIBLE NANO COATING WITH SIGNIFICANTLY ENHANCED ELECTRICAL, THERMAL AND SEMICONDUCTOR PROPERTIES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2018 — provisional 62/656,773 +2 more
Examiner
YOUNG, WILLIAM D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
South Dakota Board of Regents
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
380 granted / 699 resolved
-10.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
741
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The following Office action concerns Patent Application Number 18/828,464. Claims 21-40 are pending in the application. The applicant’s amendment filed May 15, 2026 has been entered. The previous grounds of rejection are maintained in this action and discussed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 21-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Mazyar et al (US 2013/0165353). Mazyar et al teaches a method of applying a conductive coating to a surface (par. 62, 66, 69). The coating composition comprises carbon nanotubes, boron nitride nanotubes, solvent, and polar polymer (par. 18, 50-51; Fig. 1). The nanotubes are dispersed in the fluid medium (par. 51; Fig. 1). The carbon nanotubes are functionalized with an hydroxy functional group, which is the claimed functional group and is inherently capable of hydrogen bonding (par. 30-31). The polar polymer includes polyacrylic acid (par. 65). Polyacrylic acid contains a -COOH functional group which is the claimed functional group and is hydrophilic and inherently capable of forming a hydrogen bond. Polyacrylic acid is inherently self-curing as that term is defined in the instant specification. The functionalized carbon nanotubes and the polymer binder (polyacrylic acid) form an electrostatic attraction (par. 54, 65). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to select polyacrylic acid as the polar polymer in the coating composition because Mazyar et al teaches that polyacrylic acid is capable of bonding with the functionalized nanoparticles and polyacrylic acid is a polar polymer (par. 65). The amount of nanomaterial is 1-30 % by weight (par. 72). By subtraction, the amount of fluid component is 70-99 % by weight. The fluid medium includes water (par. 71). The size of the nanotubes is 250 nm or less (par. 14). The boron nitride nanotubes include single walled nanotubes (par. 18). The nanomaterials improve the electrical conductivity of the coating composition (par. 62). An increase in conductivity provides a decrease in electrical resistance. The decrease in resistance would be expected to be at least 20 %, since the composition contains 1-30 % by weight of the conductive nanomaterial, which substantially overlaps the claimed amount of 0.5-10 % by weight. The composition is applied to a substrate by spray coating (par. 66). It would have been obvious to a person or ordinary skill in the art to apply the spray coating manually or by a machine. The substrate (surface) includes ceramic (par. 97). Ceramic is inherently capable of static charge buildup. The method includes free radical polymerization and cross-linking (par. 44-45, 65). Polymerization and cross-linking are equivalent to curing. The coating is stretchable and flexible (par. 65). The composition is used to coat tubing (par. 60). Tubing is a container. The coating is used as a seal coating or a barrier coating (par. 69). Mazyar et al does not require the coating to contain cracks. Furthermore, it is obvious and implicit that a seal coating or barrier coating should not contain cracks. It would have been obvious to a person or ordinary skill in the art not to include cracks in the coating. The nanomaterials improve the thermal conductivity of the coating composition (par. 69, 72). The increase in thermal conductivity would be expected to be at least 10 %, since the composition contains 1-30 % by weight of the nanomaterial, which substantially overlaps the claimed amount of 0.5-10 % by weight. The coating composition further comprises diamond and metal oxide nanoparticles (par. 16). Diamond and metal oxide materials are well-known to reflect light. Response to Arguments The applicant suggests that an hydroxy functional group is not capable of hydrogen bonding. However, no evidence is presented to support this argument. In addition, hydroxy group is the claimed functional group. Since Mazyar et al teaches an hydroxy functional group, the limitations regarding a functional group capable of hydrogen bonding are satisfied. Regarding the selection of polyacrylic acid, the list of possible binders is finite and includes polymers well known in the art as binders. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to select polyacrylic acid since the reference teaches that it is a suitable binder. Examiner’s Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William Young whose telephone number is (571) 270-5078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew, can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000./WILLIAM D YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 June 5, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Nov 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 23, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707615
COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND SHIELDING AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706305
METHOD OF MAKING A CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700550
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692361
GRAPHENE-MODIFIED POLYMERIC FOAM AND ARTICLES MADE THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690385
INDOLO[3.2.1-JK]CARBAZOLE-6-CARBONITRILE DERIVATIVES AS BLUE FLUORESCENT EMITTERS FOR USE IN OLEDS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 11m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month