Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/828,739

TRANSISTOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Priority
Mar 18, 2024 — provisional 63/566,464
Examiner
AZONGHA, SARDIS F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Microchip Technology Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
517 granted / 632 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
67.0%
+27.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 632 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to 09/09/2024. Claims 1-18 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al. (US Pub. 2023/0335595), hereinafter Chen, in view of Potera (US Patent 11,631,762). Regarding claim 1, Chen discloses a method of manufacturing a transistor (see figs. 3A-3K), the method comprising: providing a substrate (substrate 300-see fig. 3A and [0039]); forming a drift layer on the substrate having a protruding portion (drift layer 302 has protruding portions-see fig. 3A and[0039]); implanting a well layer into the drift layer and into sides of the protruding portion of the drift layer (well regions 310-see fig. 3E and [0044]); forming a recess portion into the well layer (see, for example, fig. 3F); implanting a source layer into a portion of the recessed portion of the well layer and extending into an undercut in the well layer and into well layer along the sides of the protruding portion of the drift layer (a tilt implantation IMP2 is performed on the drift layer 302 to form a plurality of source regions 314 within the well regions 310-see fig. 3F and [0045]. The source regions extend into an undercut in the well regions 310 as illustrated in fig. 3F); forming an insulating layer over a portion of the source layer and over a portion of the well layer on the sides of the protruding portion of the drift layer (see fig. 3I with description in [0048]-a gate insulation layer 320 is formed on the drift layer 302 and the bottom 304b and the sidewalls 304a of each of the V-grooves 304); and forming a gate electrode over the insulating layer (forming a plurality of gates G on the gate insulation layer 320-see fig. 3J and [0049]). Chen does not appear to expressly disclose implanting a JFET layer into the protruding portion in the drift layer. Potera is relied upon to teach implanting a JFET layer into the protruding portion in the drift layer (see, for example, fig. 2 with description in [col. 4, ll. 34-35 and 42-47], which illustrates an epitaxial layer 35 that forms an extended drain or drift region of Sic MOSFET 25, wherein a JFET region 43 is formed at a vertical portion (protruding portion)o of the drift layer 35). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Potera with the invention of Chen by implanting a JFET layer into the protruding portion of the drift layer, as taught by Potera, in order to provide a SiC DMOSFET device structure with a JFET region having a specific doping profile that provides reduced sensitivity of JFET resistance, which is a significant portion of total specific on-resistance, to process variation affecting the width of the JFET region (see [col. 4, ll. 15-24]). Regarding claim 10, Chen discloses a transistor (see fig. 2) comprising: a substrate (substrate 300-see fig. 3A and [0039]); a drift layer on the substrate, the drift layer having a protruding portion (drift layer 302 has protruding portions-see fig. 3A and[0039]); a well layer within the drift layer and within sides of the protruding portion of the drift layer (well regions 310-see fig. 3E and [0044]); a source layer within a portion of the well layer and extending into an undercut in the well layer and into the well layer along the sides of the protruding portion of the drift layer (a tilt implantation IMP2 is performed on the drift layer 302 to form a plurality of source regions 314 within the well regions 310-see fig. 3F and [0045]. The source regions extend into an undercut in the well regions 310 as illustrated in fig. 3F); an insulating layer over a portion of the source layer and over a portion of the well layer on the sides of the protruding portion of the drift layer (see fig. 3I with description in [0048]-a gate insulation layer 320 is formed on the drift layer 302 and the bottom 304b and the sidewalls 304a of each of the V-grooves 304); and a gate electrode over a portion of the insulating layer (forming a plurality of gates G on the gate insulation layer 320-see fig. 3J and [0049]). Chen does not appear to expressly disclose a JFET layer within the protruding portion of the drift layer. Potera is relied upon to teach a JFET layer within the protruding portion of the drift layer (see, for example, fig. 2 with description in [col. 4, ll. 34-35 and 42-47], which illustrates an epitaxial layer 35 that forms an extended drain or drift region of Sic MOSFET 25, wherein a JFET region 43 is formed at a vertical portion (protruding portion)o of the drift layer 35). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Potera with the invention of Chen by implanting a JFET layer into the protruding portion of the drift layer, as taught by Potera, in order to provide a SiC DMOSFET device structure with a JFET region having a specific doping profile that provides reduced sensitivity of JFET resistance, which is a significant portion of total specific on-resistance, to process variation affecting the width of the JFET region (see [col. 4, ll. 15-24]). Regarding claims 2 and 11, Chen discloses that the substrate 300 is a silicon carbide (SiC) substrate and may be an n-type (first type) substrate (see fig. 3A and [0039]). However, Chen is silent with regards to the doping concentration of the substrate. Potera, in for example, fig. 2 with description in [col. 6, ll. 4-7], teaches that substrate 34 is an n+ SiC substrate with a concentration of about 4E18/cm3. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Potera with the invention of Chen by doping the SiC substrate of Chen with any reasonable concentration, such as that taught by Potera, which constitutes combining prior art element according to known methods to yield predictable results. Regarding claims 3 and 12, Chen discloses wherein the drift layer comprises a second concentration of the first type dopant (drift layer 302 may be an N-drift layer, wherein the doping concentration of the drift layer 302 is ranged from 3E15/cm3 to 4E16/cm3)). Chen is silent about the specific concentration of the substrate 300, therefore, Chen does not appear to expressly disclose the first concentration is greater than the second concentration. Potera is further relied upon to each the first concentration is greater than the second concentration (see, for example, drift doping for JFET #3 having a device structure as shown in fig. 2 (see [col. 8, ll. 28-30]) is 1E16/cm3, which is lower than that of SiC substrate (4E18/cm3-see [col. 6, ll. 4-7])). Regarding claims 4 and 13, Chen discloses wherein the well layer comprises a third concentration of a second type dopant (the well regions 310 may be p-type wells, and the doping concentration of the well region 106 is ranged from 4.2 E16/cm3 to 5.6E17/cm3-see [0044]). Regarding claims 5 and 14, Chen discloses wherein the source layer comprises a fourth concentration of the first type dopant (the source regions 314 may be N+ regions, and the doping concentration of the plurality of source regions is ranged from 5E17/cm3 to 5E19/cm3-see [0045]). Regarding claims 6 and 15, Potera is further relied upon to teach wherein the JFET layer comprises a fifth concentration of the first type dopant (see, for example, figs. 2 and 7-JFET region is n-type with a doping of 4.5E16/cm3)). Regarding claims 7 and 16, Chen discloses wherein the insulating layer comprises polysilicon, oxide or a mixture of polysilicon and oxide (the gate insulation layer 320 may be a gate oxide-see [0048]). Regarding claims 8 and 17, Chen discloses wherein the first type dopant comprises an n-type dopant and the second type dopant comprises a p-type dopant (see, for example, [0039]-substrate 300 and drift layer 302 are both n-type (first type dopant)). Regarding claims 9 and 18, Chen does not appear to expressly disclose wherein the first type dopant comprises a p-type dopant and the second type dopant comprises an n-type dopant. However, choosing the first type dopant to be a p-type dopant and the second type dopant to be an n-type dopant is an obvious design choice and simply constitutes choosing from a finite (two) number of identified, predictable solutions for selecting the first and the second type dopants, with a reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARDIS F AZONGHA whose telephone number is (571)270-7706. The examiner can normally be reached 10AM-7:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at (571)272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARDIS F AZONGHA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743975
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744007
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738186
DISPLAY PANEL, PIXEL REPAIR METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICE THEREOF
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727206
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING TWO-DIMENSIONAL MATERIAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12700360
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (-2.2%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 632 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month