Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/829,546

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 10, 2024
Priority
Nov 07, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0152333
Examiner
FERNANDES, ERROL V
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
707 granted / 827 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
847
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 827 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choi et al. US 2023/0038603 A1. Regarding claims 1-7, 9, 10 and 12, Choi discloses: A semiconductor package (Figs. 6A/6B) comprising: a buffer die (100); memory dies (para 0062; 200A, 200B1, 200B2, 200C) sequentially stacked on the buffer die; a bonding layer (251b) that extends between ones of the memory dies, wherein the bonding layer is configured to bond ones of the memory dies with each other; and a molding member (260) on the buffer die, wherein the molding member is on sidewalls of the memory dies, wherein each of the memory dies includes: a substrate (210) having first (bottom) and second (top) surfaces opposite to each other in a vertical direction substantially perpendicular to an upper surface of the buffer die; and a first signal pad (see annotated Fig. 6B below; IOS portion “C”) and a test pad structure (ETS) on the first surface of the substrate, wherein the test pad structure includes a test pad (see annotated Fig. 6B below; “A”) and a first conductive pattern (see annotated Fig. 6B below; “B”) stacked in the vertical direction on the first surface of the substrate, and wherein the first conductive pattern has an uneven surface facing the substrate (“B” as a whole is shown with an uneven surface facing 210). PNG media_image1.png 456 597 media_image1.png Greyscale (claim 2) annotated Fig. 6B above; “A” (inclusive of vias) shown with an uneven surface facing 210. (claim 3) annotated Fig. 6B above; surface of “A” (inclusive of vias) shown substantially coplanar with an upper surface of “C” (inclusive of vias). (claims 4 and 5) annotated Fig. 6B above; at least the distance of the curved right surface of “A” is less than the bottom surface of “C”. (claim 6) Fig. 6B; a connection member including a second conductive pattern (256b) and a third conductive pattern (258b). (claim 7) annotated Fig. 6B above; lowermost surface of “B” is less than a distance of the lowermost surface of 256b from the substrate 210. (claim 9) Fig. 6B; a second signal pad (BP2). (claim 10) annotated Fig. 6B above; an insulating layer (221); first and second wiring structures (222; left on “A” and right on “C”). (claim 12) Fig. 6B; bonding layer (251b) and memory dies (200A, 200B1, 200B2, 200C) are free of a gap therebetween. Regarding claims 13, 15 and 17, Choi discloses: A semiconductor package (Figs. 6A/6B) comprising: a buffer die (100); memory dies (para 0062; 200A, 200B1, 200B2, 200C) sequentially stacked on the buffer die; a conductive connection member between the memory dies, the conductive connection member including a first conductive pattern (256b) and a second conductive pattern (258b) stacked in a vertical direction substantially perpendicular to an upper surface of the buffer die (see Fig. 6A in view of Fig. 6B), and the first and second conductive patterns including different materials (paras 0035 and 0036; copper or alloys including the same) from each other; a bonding layer (251b) between the memory dies, wherein the bonding layer is configured to bond ones of the memory dies with each other; and a molding member (260) on the buffer die, wherein the molding member is on sidewalls of the memory dies, wherein each of the memory dies includes: a substrate (210) having first (bottom) and second (top) surfaces opposite to each other in a vertical direction; and a signal pad (see annotated Fig. 6B below; IOS portion “C”) and a test pad structure (ETS) on the first surface of the substrate, wherein the test pad structure includes a test pad (see annotated Fig. 6B below; “A”) and a third conductive pattern (see annotated Fig. 6B below; “B”) stacked in the vertical direction on the first surface of the substrate, and wherein the signal pad contacts the first conductive pattern of the conductive connection member; and wherein a distance from the substrate to a lowermost surface of the third conductive pattern is less than a distance from the substrate to a lower surface of the first conductive pattern. PNG media_image1.png 456 597 media_image1.png Greyscale (claim 15) annotated Fig. 6B above; bottom of test pad (“A”) having different distances from the substrate. (claim 17) annotated Fig. 6B above; an insulating layer (221); first and second wiring structures (222; left on “A” and right on “C”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8, 11, 14, 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to teach or clearly suggest the limitations of claim 8 stating “wherein a distance from the substrate to a lowermost surface of the first conductive pattern is greater than a distance from the substrate to a lower surface of the third conductive pattern”; of claim 11 stating “wherein the test pad structure further includes a seed pattern between the first conductive pattern and the test pad, and wherein the first conductive pattern includes a first portion and a second portion, wherein an upper surface and a sidewall of the first portion is overlapped by the seed pattern, and a lower surface and a sidewall of the second portion is overlapped by the bonding layer”; of claim 14 stating “wherein portions of a lower surface of the third conductive pattern have different respective distances from the substrate”; and of claim 16 stating “wherein a distance from the substrate to a lowermost surface of the test pad is less than a distance from the substrate to a lower surface of the signal pad”. In light of these limitations, the prior art fails to anticipate or make obvious the claimed invention. Claims 18-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art fails to teach or clearly suggest of claim 18 stating “wherein distance from the first substrate to a lowermost surface of the third conductive pattern is less than distance from the first substrate to a lower surface of the first conductive pattern”. In light of these limitations, the prior art fails to anticipate or make obvious the claimed invention. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERROL V FERNANDES whose telephone number is (571)270-7433. The examiner can normally be reached on 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached on 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERROL V FERNANDES/Primary Examiner, AU 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772433
SINGLE GATE THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) DYNAMIC RANDOM-ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) DEVICES
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772847
COOLING FOR BACK SIDE POWER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12757761
TSV-TYPE EMBEDDED MULTI-DIE INTERCONNECT BRIDGE ENABLING WITH THERMAL COMPRESSION NON-CONDUCTIVE FILM (TC-NCF) PROCESS
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757781
PATTERNED SHEET MUF FOR COMPLEX PACKAGES AND METHODS OF PRODUCING
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757457
DIODE STRUCTURE FOR DIRECT BACKSIDE CONTACT, BACKSIDE POWER DELIVERY NETWORK
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 827 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month