Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/829,816

HYPERICIN-PVP COMPLEX WITH HIGH HYPERICIN CONTENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 10, 2024
Priority
Jul 13, 2018 — EU 18183435.9 +2 more
Examiner
KUCHARCZK, JED A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hypericum Lifescience GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
74 granted / 93 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
128
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 93 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority This application is a divisional of U.S. Application No. 17/255,349, filed December 22, 2020, which is a national phase application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2019/068775 filed 12 July 2019, which claims priority to European Patent Application No. 18183435.9 filed 13 July 2018. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/19/2024 and 05/13/2026 were filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for some complexes comprising greater than 6 % by weight of the hypericin or the hypericin salt with respect to a total weight of the complex, does not reasonably provide enablement for all complexes comprising greater than 6 % by weight of the hypericin or the hypericin salt with respect to a total weight of the complex. The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. The criteria for enablement set out in In re Wands, MPEP 2164.01(a), considers the following factors: Breadth of the claims—Claim 1 encompasses complexes comprising greater than 6 % by weight of the hypericin or the hypericin salt with respect to a total weight of the complex. This includes complexes comprising amounts nearing 100 % by weight hypericin. Level of skill in this art—The level of skill in the art is high. State of the prior art—Kubin et al. (Pharmazie 63 (2008) 263-269) describes hypericin-PVP complexes comprising 0.6 % to 2.5 % by weight hypericin. See pp. 2-3 of the instant specification describing hypericin-PVP complexes in the prior art. The highest % by weight reported is 5% in WO 01/89576 A5. Working examples—The specification (pp. 12-15) shows the production of hypericin-PVP complexes (Examples 1-2) compared to the production method of the prior art (Example 3). A precipitate is formed in Example 3 when additional hypericin is added, suggesting greater than 6 % hypericin as claimed is unexpected. Example 4 shows that a 40 % by weight hypericin complex is obtained from example 1. Direction and Guidance—There is little additional guidance in the specification as to how high of a weight % of hypericin or hypericin salt thereof can be achieved. Thus, while the specification has enabled some complexes comprising greater than 6 % by weight of the hypericin or the hypericin salt with respect to a total weight of the complex, does not reasonably provide enablement for all complexes comprising greater than 6 % by weight of the hypericin or the hypericin salt with respect to a total weight of the complex. Given that the prior art only teaches complexes with small weight % of hypericin up to 5% and that the methods employed by the prior art lead to precipitation at higher weight %, the prior instant claims drawn to higher % can be considered unexpected. Accordingly, a PHOSITA cannot reasonably consider higher % such as 80 % by weight hypericin to be enabled when only examples of 40 % by weight hypericin are shown. Conclusion Claims 1-5 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JED A KUCHARCZK whose telephone number is (571)270-5206. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30 to 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Milligan can be reached at (571) 270-7674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JED A KUCHARCZK/Examiner, Art Unit 1623 /VALERIE RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679827
PYRIMIDINE COMPOUNDS AND THEIR PHARMACEUTICAL USES
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661344
SAFE AND STABLE NIMODIPINE FORMULATION FOR INJECTION AND METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642789
CARBOXAMIDE DERIVATIVES
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12629349
Recognition ability improving agent
5y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630529
GCN2 MODULATOR COMPOUNDS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 93 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month