Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/829,863

STORAGE MEDIUM, IMAGE CREATION SUPPORT SYSTEM, AND IMAGE CREATION SUPPORT METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 10, 2024
Examiner
LU, WILLIAM
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Konica Minolta Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
425 granted / 595 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
626
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 595 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-15 filed September 10th 2024 are pending in the current action. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jain et al. (US2025/0095221) in view of Benedetto et al. (US2024/0193351) Consider claim 1, where Jain teaches a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a program causing a computer to perform: first reception of receiving first text data (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶34-35 where computing device 102 receives input data 114 comprising textual information 120); providing the first text data to an image generation AI apparatus; (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶37-38 where the input data 114 is provided to a generative AI model 122) first image obtainment of obtaining, from the image generation AI apparatus, first image data for the first text data, the first image data being generated by the image generation AI apparatus; (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶37 where the generative AI model 122 generates an output image 124 from the input data 114) and external apparatus transmission of transmitting the first text data and the first image data associated with one another to an external apparatus. (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶38 where the output image 124 and the textual information 120 is sent over network 106 to the client device 104) Jain teaches providing the textual data 120 to the generative AI model 122 and although a single computing device 102 is shown, the computing device 102 is also representative of a plurality of different devices, such as multiple servers (See Jain ¶34), however Jain does not explicitly teach first transmission of transmitting the first text data. However, in an analogous field of endeavor Benedetto teaches first transmission of transmitting the first text data.(See Benedetto Fig. 1 and ¶30 where the user prompt is encoded at a coder/decoder (CODEC) module available at the client device 100 and the encoded user prompt is transmitted to the server 300 over the network 200 in accordance to communication protocol followed for communicating between the client device 100 and the server 300) Therefore, it would have been obvious that when the computing device 102 of Jain is implemented as a plurality of devices, the information 120 would be shared via a transmission as taught by Benedetto. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to perform the modification to use known methods to communicate between a plurality of devices in a known embodiment. 2. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the program further causes the computer to perform second reception of receiving second text data as a comment on the first image data, (See Jain ¶46-49 Additionally or alternatively, the textual information 120 includes comments 224 and/or reviews 226 posted to a comment section and/or review section of a publication 212. The comments 224 and/or reviews 226 are posted by consumers that have viewed and/or interacted with the publication 212) wherein the external apparatus transmission includes transmitting the first text data, the first image data and the second text data associated with one another to the external apparatus. (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶38, 49 where the output image 124 and the textual information 120 is sent over network 106 to the client device 104, where the textual information 120 may include the publication text as well as comments/reviews.) Consider claim 3, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 2, wherein the program further causes the computer to perform: second transmission of transmitting the first image data and the second text data to the image generation AI apparatus; (See Jain ¶61-62, 89 where the structured sources of the input data 114, for example, include sources of the input data 114 provided by a publisher as part of creating or editing a publication 212) and second image obtainment of obtaining second image data for the first image data and the second text data from the image generation AI apparatus, wherein the external apparatus transmission includes transmitting the first text data, the first image data, the second text data and the second image data associated with one another to the external apparatus. (See Jain ¶89 where The third panel 414 additionally includes a user interface element 424 that is selectable to instruct the background generation system 112 to generate a new output image 124 in accordance with the updated parameters specified via the third panel 414. In response to receiving user input selecting the user interface element 424, for instance, the client device 204 communicates the updated parameters to the background generation system 112, which generates a new output image 124 in accordance with the techniques discussed herein based on the updated parameters. The new output image 124 is communicated back to the client device 204, which renders the new output image 124 for display in the first panel 410 and/or the second panel 412.) Consider claim 4, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 3, wherein the program further causes the computer to perform third reception of receiving third text data as a comment on the second image data, wherein the external apparatus transmission includes transmitting the first text data, the first image data, the second text data, the second image data and the third text data associated with one another to the external apparatus. (See Jain ¶89, 72 where The third panel 414 additionally includes a user interface element 424 that is selectable to instruct the background generation system 112 to generate a new output image 124 in accordance with the updated parameters specified via the third panel 414. In response to receiving user input selecting the user interface element 424, for instance, the client device 204 communicates the updated parameters to the background generation system 112, which generates a new output image 124 in accordance with the techniques discussed herein based on the updated parameters. The new output image 124 is communicated back to the client device 204, which renders the new output image 124 for display in the first panel 410 and/or the second panel 412. Thus, new comments may generate new images) Consider claim 5, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the external apparatus transmission is transmission based on an obtainment instruction from the external apparatus. (See Jain ¶50 where the notification 230 includes an indication of the user 232 (e.g., a user profile) that is requesting to access the publication 212) Consider claim 6, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the first text data is based on at least one of free description and selection from a prepared text. (See Jain ¶61-62 where the input data can come from structured sources (See Jain Fig. 4B) or unstructured sources (open ended)) Consider claim 7, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the program further causes the computer to perform display of causing a display to display an obtained design requirement extracted from the first text data by the image generation AI apparatus. (See Jain ¶48, 86-89 and Fig. 4b where design attributes are extracted and fed through the AI image generator) Consider claim 8, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 7, wherein deletion is selectable for each of the displayed design requirement. (See Jain ¶67, 88 where a particular attribute may be removed from the generate text model) Consider claim 9, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the first image data obtained in the first image obtainment includes a plurality of images, wherein the program further causes the computer to perform: display of causing a display to display the plurality of images; and image selection of allowing a user to select a desired image from among the displayed plurality of images, and, wherein in the external apparatus transmission, the selected desired image is transmitted as the first image data. (See Jain Fig. 4b and ¶89-91 where the first panel 410 presents a plurality of alternate generated image that may be used) Consider claim 10, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the program further causes the computer to perform drawing style information reception of receiving an input of drawing style information. (See Jain ¶89 where the styles that are specifiable by the user interface element 422 include, for example, a degree of realism for the output images 124 (e.g., photorealistic images or cartoon images), color schemes for the output images 124, and the like.) Consider claim 11, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 10, wherein the drawing style information is image feature data obtained by learning a past image group for an identical customer. (See Benedetto ¶35 where the style can be deduced from the user profile data of the user or from interactive content consumed by the user over time. The user profile data can be retrieved from a user profile database (not shown) using a user identifier of the user. The interactive content preferred by the user can be retrieved from usage history or interactive history maintained for the user in content database (not shown), for example.) Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to save the styles of Jain such that they can be referred to later as taught by Benedetto. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to perform the modification for the advantage of/ benefit of using known techniques of referring back to previous work in order to maintain stylistic consistency. Consider claim 12, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the first image data is image data that is a source of a final design image, and is image data being lower in at least one of resolution, the number of gradations and the number of colors than the final design image. (See Benedetto ¶75 where after the final denoising stage, the output is provided to a decoder 612 that transforms that output to the pixel space. In one embodiment, the output is also upscaled to improve the resolution. ) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the creation and editing operation of a publication as taught by Jain could upscale the final image as taught by Benedetto. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to perform the modification for the advantage of/ benefit of using fewer resources while working on the project and creating an upscaled final published image. Consider claim 13, where Jain in view of Benedetto teaches the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the program further causes the computer to perform: third transmission of transmitting the first image data to a saliency analysis apparatus; saliency analysis result obtainment of obtaining a saliency analysis result of the first image data from the saliency analysis apparatus; and display of causing a display to display the obtained saliency analysis result. (See Jain Fig. 3 and ¶73-74 where the output image 124 is provided to the visual saliency module 128 to obtain a visual saliency map 324 and displaying the resulting image if the saliency threshold is met) Consider claim 14, where Jain teaches an image creation support system comprising: a hardware processor that receives first text data; (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶34-35 where computing device 102 receives input data 114 comprising textual information 120); and a provider that provides the first text data to an image generation AI apparatus, (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶37-38 where the input data 114 is provided to a generative AI model 122) wherein the hardware processor obtains, from the image generation AI apparatus, first image data for the first text data, the first image data being generated by the image generation AI apparatus, (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶37 where the generative AI model 122 generates an output image 124 from the input data 114) and wherein the transmitter transmits the first text data and the first image data associated with one another to an external apparatus. (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶38 where the output image 124 and the textual information 120 is sent over network 106 to the client device 104) Jain teaches providing the textual data 120 to the generative AI model 122 and although a single computing device 102 is shown, the computing device 102 is also representative of a plurality of different devices, such as multiple servers (See Jain ¶34), however Jain does not explicitly teach a transmitter for transmitting the first text data. However, in an analogous field of endeavor Benedetto teaches a transmitter for transmitting the first text data.(See Benedetto Fig. 1 and ¶30 where the user prompt is encoded at a coder/decoder (CODEC) module available at the client device 100 and the encoded user prompt is transmitted to the server 300 over the network 200 in accordance to communication protocol followed for communicating between the client device 100 and the server 300) Therefore, it would have been obvious that when the computing device 102 of Jain is implemented as a plurality of devices, the information 120 would be shared via a transmission as taught by Benedetto. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to perform the modification to use known methods to communicate between a plurality of devices in a known embodiment. Consider claim 15, where Jain teaches an image creation support method that is performed by an image creation support system, comprising; receiving first text data; (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶34-35 where computing device 102 receives input data 114 comprising textual information 120) providing the first text data to an image generation AI apparatus; obtaining, from the image generation AI apparatus, (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶37-38 where the input data 114 is provided to a generative AI model 122) first image data for the first text data, the first image data being generated by the image generation AI apparatus; (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶37 where the generative AI model 122 generates an output image 124 from the input data 114) and transmitting the first text data and the first image data associated with one another to an external apparatus. (See Jain Fig. 1 and ¶38 where the output image 124 and the textual information 120 is sent over network 106 to the client device 104) Jain teaches providing the textual data 120 to the generative AI model 122 and although a single computing device 102 is shown, the computing device 102 is also representative of a plurality of different devices, such as multiple servers (See Jain ¶34), however Jain does not explicitly teach transmitting the first text data. However, in an analogous field of endeavor Benedetto teaches transmitting the first text data.(See Benedetto Fig. 1 and ¶30 where the user prompt is encoded at a coder/decoder (CODEC) module available at the client device 100 and the encoded user prompt is transmitted to the server 300 over the network 200 in accordance to communication protocol followed for communicating between the client device 100 and the server 300) Therefore, it would have been obvious that when the computing device 102 of Jain is implemented as a plurality of devices, the information 120 would be shared via a transmission as taught by Benedetto. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to perform the modification to use known methods to communicate between a plurality of devices in a known embodiment. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM LU whose telephone number is (571)270-1809. The examiner can normally be reached 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 571-270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WILLIAM LU Primary Examiner Art Unit 2624 /WILLIAM LU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592191
PIXEL DRIVING CIRCUIT AND DRIVING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591307
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN INTENT OF A USER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585054
SUNROOF SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING PASSIVE RADIATIVE COOLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566328
OPTICAL SCANNING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566502
Methods and Systems for Controlling and Interacting with Objects Based on Non-Sensory Information Rendering
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 595 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month