Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/830,130

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING SLEEPY FUNCTIONALITY IN WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 10, 2024
Priority
Jun 22, 2023 — continuation of 18/339,764
Examiner
SEFCHECK, GREGORY B
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
476 granted / 687 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
746
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
86.8%
+46.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority as a CON of co-pending 18/339764 filed 6/22/2023 is acknowledged. Preliminary Amendment filed 11/19/2024 is acknowledged. Claims 1-20 have been cancelled. Claims 21-40 have been newly added and remain pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 21, 26-32, and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hui et al. (US20210385771A1), hereafter Hui. Regarding claims 21 and 37, Hui discloses a device (Fig. 4, parent device; Fig. 7-8) comprising a transceiver (Fig. 8, I/O interfaces 808) and processing circuitry (Fig. 8, processing system 810) coupled to the transceiver, configured to perform a method to cause the transceiver to transmit a wake-up signal (Fig. 4, 410; paragraph 57-58) to an end device (Fig. 4, End Device 304), establish a connection with the end device (Fig. 4, 425; paragraph 59-60), and perform coordinated sampled listening with the end device using the transceiver (paragraph 53-60; CSL after synchronized reception is established). Regarding claim 32, Hui discloses a non-transitory computer-readable medium (Fig. 8, computer-readable storage memory 812) storing instructions (paragraph 110) that, when executed by processing circuitry (Fig. 8, processing system 810) of an electronic device (Fig. 4, parent device 302), cause the processing circuitry to transmit, using a transceiver (Fig. 8, I/O interfaces 808), a wake-up signal (Fig. 4, 410; paragraph 57-58) to an end device (Fig. 4, End Device 304) to establish, using the transceiver, a connection with the end device (Fig. 4, 425; paragraph 59-60) and perform, using the transceiver, coordinated sampled listening with the end device (paragraph 53-60; CSL performed after synchronized reception is established). Regarding claims 26-31, Hui discloses the end device, such as a router (Fig. 1, router-eligible end device 104) of a Thread network (paragraph 90) or sleepy end device (paragraph 3, 41-47; sleeping mesh network devices) is communicatively coupled to the electronic device via an IEEE 802.15.4 wireless mesh network (paragraph 39, 53, 105). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 22-25, 33-36, and 38-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hui in view of Hanley et al. (US20180132182A1), hereafter Hanley. Regarding claims 22-24, 33 35, 36, and 38-40, Hui discloses periodically activating a window of time for communications between parent device and end device (paragraph 9, 19, 53-56; Fig. 3a, receive window 322) but does not expressly show transmitting an indication of a first plurality of time slots and a second plurality of time slots to the end device, to enter a low power state during one or more times outside of the first plurality of time slots and the second plurality of time slots, or to exit the low power state to transmit or receive wireless signals during the first plurality of time slots or the second plurality of time slots based on receiving the wake-up signal. Hanley discloses analogous art (Title: Optimization of Broadcast Messaging for Low-Energy Devices Communicating on a Time-Slotted Channel Hopping Network) including a parent device (paragraph 2, 18; parent devices including routers defined by IEEE 802.15.4) comprising a transceiver (Fig. 2, TSCH device 102c with Transceiver 220) and processing circuitry (Processor 202) operatively coupled to the transceiver (via Bus 206) to transmit an indication of a first plurality of time slots (Fig. 4, time slots 411-415 according to configured hopping pattern) and a second plurality of time slots (Fig. 4, time slots 421-425 according to configured hopping pattern) to an end device (LE Device 104c) to cause at least a portion of the transceiver to enter a low power state during one or more times outside of the first plurality of time slots and the second plurality of time slots (Abstract; Fig. 5-7; paragraphs 3-6, 18-20, 38-51; sleep state during wake/sleep cycle) and cause the transceiver to exit the low power state to transmit or receive wireless signals during the first plurality of time slots or the second plurality of time slots (Abstract; Fig. 5-7; paragraphs 3-6, 18-20, 38-51; wake state during wake/sleep cycle) based on receiving the wake-up signal (Abstract; Fig. 9, step 920; paragraph 64; acknowledgement message to check-in identifying broadcast timeslot). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of effective filing to modify Hui by transmitting an indication of a first plurality of time slots and a second plurality of time slots to the end device, to enter a low power state during one or more times outside of the first plurality of time slots and the second plurality of time slots, and to exit the low power state to transmit or receive wireless signals during the first plurality of time slots or the second plurality of time slots, as shown by Hanley, thereby optimizing communication between parent devices and low-energy end devices operating on different wake/sleep cycles. Regarding claim 34, The combination of Hui and Hanley discloses the first plurality of time slots is associated with receiving, using the transceiver, wireless signals from the end device (Hui: Fig. 3a-b; Hanley: Fig. 4-7; paragraphs 3-6, 18-20, 38-51; wake state during wake/sleep cycle; Fig. 9, step 910; transmitting), and the second plurality of time slots is associated with transmitting, using the transceiver, wireless signals to the end device (Hui: Fig. 3a-b; Hanley: Fig. 4-7; paragraphs 3-6, 18-20, 38-51; wake state during wake/sleep cycle; Fig. 9, step 920-930; receiving/listening). See motivation above. Regarding claim 25, The combination of Hui and Hanley discloses the processing circuitry is configured to determine the plurality of time slots based at least in part on network traffic on a wireless network to which the electronic device is communicatively coupled (Hui: paragraph 90; variety of custom or standard protocols; Hanley: paragraph 28; PN-TSCH protocol compared to slower LE-TSCH protocol). See motivation above. Conclusion 5. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY B SEFCHECK whose telephone number is (571)272-3098. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached at 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY B SEFCHECK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677322
Contention Resolution in Non-Terrestrial Networks
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12640841
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND DECODING METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12621732
USER DEVICE, RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD
6y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12604276
USER EQUIPMENT (UE) CAPABILITY SIGNALING FOR MAXIMUM POWER SUPPORT
5y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12568493
Multiple Downlink Semi-Persistent Scheduling Configurations for New Radio Internet of Things
4y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+19.1%)
3y 6m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month