Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/830,655

FILTER STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Priority
Feb 26, 2024 — provisional 63/557,626 +1 more
Examiner
GLENN, KIMBERLY E
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lite-On Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
956 granted / 1065 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1097
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1065 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/17/2025 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee US Patent Application Publication 2019/0180924 in view of Okamoto US Patent 6,480,088. Lee discloses in figure 4, a filter module comprising: a circuit board 401 (i.e. a substrate) ; a capacitor C1 disposed on the circuit board; and a first coil module L1 (i.e. a first choke element) , disposed on the circuit board, wherein the first coil module comprises a first ring core 430 having an annular shape, first and second coils 410 420 (i.e. two first windings) , and the first coil and second coil are wound around the first ring core. PNG media_image1.png 250 381 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 2, the filter module further comprises a second coil module L2 (i.e. a second choke element) disposed on the circuit board, wherein the capacitor C1 is situated between the first and second coil modules, the second coil module has a second ring core 430’ having an annular shape, a first and second coil 410’ 420’ (i.e. two second windings) and the first and second coils 410’ 420’ are wound around the second ring core. The ring cores inherently have through holes. Thus, Lee is shown to teach all the limitations of the claims with the exception of a first magnetic conductive member, wherein the first magnetic conductive member surrounds the first ferrite core and is located adjacent to the capacitor element, a second magnetic conductive member, and, wherein the second magnetic conductive member surrounds the second ferrite core and is located adjacent to the capacitor element, a part of the first magnetic conductive member is located between the first windings , the substrate forms a plurality of first slots, the first magnetic conductive member extends through the first slots and the first magnetic conductive member has a rectangular hollow structure and the magnetic conductive member at least partially covers the through holes of the ring core. Okamoto discloses a common mode choke coil, comprising: a toroidal magnetic core mounted on a base; two coils wound equally to each other so as to cancel out respective magnetic fluxes relative to a normal mode current, such that one coil is wound around one half of said toroidal magnetic core and another coil is wound around the other half thereof; a partition plate provided inside said toroidal magnetic core so as to isolate said two coils from each other; an insulating protection plate formed substantially like U-letter, said insulating protection plate being detachably attached via its both ends to said base for mounting said toroidal magnetic core; and a belt-like magnetic shield plate attached to said insulating protection plate at its surface opposite to a surface facing said two coils, said magnetic shield plate being provided along a direction of leakage flux of said two coils so as to reduce said leakage flux and being placed along said partition plate so as to cover said toroidal magnetic core. PNG media_image2.png 677 349 media_image2.png Greyscale With regard to claim 3, Okamoto show in figure 1A, that the belt like magnetic shield plate is located between the first and second coils 291 292. With regards to claim 4, Okamoto shows in figure 1a the base forms a plurality plate mounting holes 28 , and the belt like magnetic shield plate through the mounting holes. With regards to claim 5, the belt like magnetic shield plate has a rectangular hollow structure. One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to provide the first and second coil modules of Lee with belt like magnetic shield plates as taught by Okamoto. The motivation for this modification would have been to provide the advantageous benefit of cutting off leakage flux. (column 2;lines 3-8) Lee discloses in figure 4, a filter module comprising: a circuit board 401 (i.e. a substrate) ; a capacitor C1 disposed on the circuit board; and a first coil module L1 (i.e. a first choke element) , disposed on the circuit board, wherein the first coil module comprises a first ring core 430, first and second coils 410 420 (i.e. two first windings) , and the first coil and second coil are wound around the first ring core. (per claim 6) With regard to claim 9, the filter module further comprises a second coil module L2 (i.e. a second choke element) disposed on the circuit board, wherein the capacitor C1 is situated between the first and second coil modules, the second coil module has a second ring core 430’, a first and second coil 410’ 420’ (i.e. two second windings) and the first and second coils 410’ 420’ are wound around the second ring core. Thus, Lee is shown to teach all the limitations of the claims with the exception of the first ferrite core being situated in the first magnetic conductive member, and forms a first opening and the second ferrite core being situated in the second magnetic conductive member and forms a second opening. Okamoto discloses a common mode choke coil, comprising: a toroidal magnetic core mounted on a base; two coils wound equally to each other so as to cancel out respective magnetic fluxes relative to a normal mode current, such that one coil is wound around one half of said toroidal magnetic core and another coil is wound around the other half thereof; a partition plate provided inside said toroidal magnetic core so as to isolate said two coils from each other; an insulating protection plate formed substantially like U-letter, said insulating protection plate being detachably attached via its both ends to said base for mounting said toroidal magnetic core; and a belt-like magnetic shield plate attached to said insulating protection plate at its surface opposite to a surface facing said two coils, said magnetic shield plate being provided along a direction of leakage flux of said two coils so as to reduce said leakage flux and being placed along said partition plate so as to cover said toroidal magnetic core. Additionally, as shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, and FIGS. 5A and 5B, the magnetic shield plate 24 may be provided only at areas where leakage flux should be prevented, for example, only on the top face and one side face of the insulating protection plate 23 or only on both side faces (opening on the top) thereof . PNG media_image3.png 263 246 media_image3.png Greyscale One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to provide the first and second coil modules of Lee with belt like magnetic shield plates as taught by Okamoto. The motivation for this modification would have been to provide the advantageous benefit of cutting off leakage flux. (column 2;lines 3-8) Lee discloses in figure 4, a filter module comprising: a circuit board 401 (i.e. a substrate) ; a capacitor C1 disposed on the circuit board; and a first coil module L1 (i.e. a first choke element) , disposed on the circuit board, wherein the first coil module comprises a first ring core 430 having an annular shape, first and second coils 410 420 (i.e. two first windings) , and the first coil and second coil are wound around the first ring core. (per claim 11) The ring cores inherently have through hole. With regards to claim 12, the projections of the capacitor and the first ring core on a plane perpendicular to the central axis of the first through hole at least partially overlap. With regard to claim 17, the filter module further comprises a second coil module L2 (i.e. a second choke element) disposed on the circuit board, wherein the capacitor C1 is situated between the first and second coil modules, the second coil module has a second ring core 430’ having an annular shape, a first and second coil 410’ 420’ (i.e. two second windings) and the first and second coils 410’ 420’ are wound around the second ring core. With regards to claim 18, first coil module , the capacitor , and the second coil module are arranged along the central axis of the first through hole. Thus, Lee is shown to teach all the limitations of the claims with the exception of at least a part of the first through hole is covered by the first magnetic conductive member, the first magnetic conductive member has a first section situated between the first ferrite core and the capacitive element , the first magnetic conductive member further has a second section connected to and bent relative to the first section, at least a part of the second through hole is covered by the second magnetic conductive member.. Okamoto discloses a common mode choke coil, comprising: a toroidal magnetic core mounted on a base; two coils wound equally to each other so as to cancel out respective magnetic fluxes relative to a normal mode current, such that one coil is wound around one half of said toroidal magnetic core and another coil is wound around the other half thereof; a partition plate provided inside said toroidal magnetic core so as to isolate said two coils from each other; an insulating protection plate formed substantially like U-letter, said insulating protection plate being detachably attached via its both ends to said base for mounting said toroidal magnetic core; and a belt-like magnetic shield plate attached to said insulating protection plate at its surface opposite to a surface facing said two coils, said magnetic shield plate being provided along a direction of leakage flux of said two coils so as to reduce said leakage flux and being placed along said partition plate so as to cover said toroidal magnetic core. PNG media_image4.png 295 337 media_image4.png Greyscale With regards to claim 14 , the belt like magnetic shield plates has a first section situated between the first ring core and the capacitor. With regards to claim 15, the belt like magnetic shield plate further has a second section connected to and bent relative to the first section. One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to provide the first and second coil modules of Lee with belt like magnetic shield plates as taught by Okamoto. The motivation for this modification would have been to provide the advantageous benefit of cutting off leakage flux. (column 2;lines 3-8) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 8, 10, 13, 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY E GLENN whose telephone number is (571)272-1761. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at 571-272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. March 25, 2026 /K.E.G/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640708
MULTI-FREQUENCY CAPACITANCE CANCELLATION IN AN ACOUSTIC FILTER CIRCUIT
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633634
NEGATIVE DIFFERENTIAL PHASE SHIFTER
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633893
FILTER AND MULTIPLEXER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626185
SIGNAL COMBINER
4y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620684
SPATIAL FILTER, DRIVING METHOD THEREOF AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1065 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month