Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/830,682

SHUNT TRUCK POSITIONED TRAILER STAND

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Priority
Jun 24, 2019 — provisional 62/865,727 +3 more
Examiner
ARCE, MARLON ALEXANDER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ideal Warehouse Innovations Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1086 granted / 1270 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1279
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1270 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Berends (US 3881749). Berends discloses a method of positioning a portable trailer stand for a semi-trailer (14, under the broadest reasonable interpretation a factory home single wide trailer can be seen as a semi-trailer as they are heavy rectangles with wheel assemblies that are able to be towed on the roads when being transported, see Col. 1, lines 5-12 as the portable trailer is made to transport factory homes) that is parked and supported on its landing gear (see figure 1), the portable trailer stand comprising a stepped assembly (as there is a lower deck assembly in between frame members 40 and a second deck assembly in between frame members 42a), the stepped assembly comprising a plurality of vertically-oriented steps (explained above as two separate decks), each step providing a landing area (decks) to support an underside of the semi-trailer in the event of a collapse of the landing gear or tipping of the semi-trailer (see figures 1 and 2 as the stand has a landing gear), the method comprising: positioning the portable trailer stand at least partially beneath a portion of a forward end of the semi-trailer that is parked to provide a vertical gap (which can be considered to be any vertical space in between the decks) in between the underside of the semi-trailer and a step of the plurality of vertically-oriented steps {{as the use of the stand will lead to backing up the stand under a semi-trailer, wherein the trailer can rest on one of the decks}}. Regarding claim 2, the stand can be moved by a transport truck and is used to couple a trailer to it. Regarding claim 3, the stand has a receiver interface (see figure 4). Regarding claim 4, wherein the stand can be positioned under the forward end of the trailer that is parked by the transport truck. Regarding claim 5, wherein the transport truck, operatively coupled to the portable trailer stand, is positioned while lifting at least a portion of the portable trailer stand (via the jack 130) , to position the portable trailer stand at least partially beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer that is parked (or in this case under a factory home to be transported of just to hold up the front end of it). Regarding claim 6, wherein the transport truck, operatively coupled to the portable trailer stand, is positioned rearward (reversed) to position the portable trailer stand at least partially beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer (or factory home) that is parked. Regarding claim 7, wherein the portable trailer stand is positioned at least partially beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer (or factory home) that is parked before material (any object can be considered material) is at least one of unloaded from, and loaded on, the semi-trailer that is parked. Regarding claim 8, wherein the stand can be decoupled from the transport truck to hold the semi-trailer (or factory home) in place. Regarding claim 9, wherein the transport truck can be decoupled from the stand and moved away while the stand is still under the semi-trailer (or factory home) while the stand holds the gap (see figure 1 as there is a vertical space in between the decks). Regarding claim 10, wherein the portable trailer stand is operatively coupled to the transport vehicle using a projection (118) and receiver (fifth wheel connector, see Col, 3, lines 13-14) interface. Regarding claim 11, further comprising repositioning the transport truck away from the forward end of the semi-trailer (or factory home) that is parked to removably decouple the portable trailer stand from the transport vehicle by disengaging the projection from the receiver (decoupling the king pin 118 from the fifth wheel connector), while retaining the portable trailer stand at least partially beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer that is parked (with aid from the jack 130) and while maintaining the vertical gap (which can be considered to be any vertical space in between the decks). Regarding claims 12 and 13, further comprising, decoupling the transport truck from the stand and moving it way from the forward end of the stand and semi-trailer (or factory home). Regarding claim 14, further comprising repositioning the transport truck to operatively couple the transport truck to the stand while the stand is positioned at least partially beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer (or factory home) that is parked. Regarding claim 15, wherein the stand is operatively coupled to the transport truck using a projection (118) and receiver interface (fifth wheel connector). Regarding claim 16, further comprising repositioning the transport truck, operatively coupled to the stand, to remove the stand from beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer that is parked (the transport truck is moved to decouple the stand from the semi-trailer). Regarding claim 17, wherein the transport truck is repositioned to remove the stand from beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer (or factory home) that is parked after material (anything taken out or placed on the semi-trailer or factory home) is at least one of unloaded from, and loaded on, the semi-trailer that is parked. Regarding claim 18, wherein the transport truck, operatively coupled to the stand, is repositioned forward to remove the portable trailer stand from beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer that is parked (pulling the stand forward to completely disconnect from the semi-trailer or factory home). Regarding claim 19, wherein the transport truck, operatively coupled to the stand, is repositioned while lifting at least the portion of the stand off the ground (can be done with the jack 130), to remove the portable trailer stand from beneath the portion of the forward end of the semi-trailer that is parked. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Marlon A Arce whose telephone number is (571)272-1341. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM - 4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Valentin Neacsu can be reached at 571-272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARLON A ARCE/Examiner, Art Unit 3611 /VALENTIN NEACSU, Ph.D./Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746817
VEHICLE BEHAVIOR CONTROL DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745709
ELECTRIC WORK VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734716
QUADRUPED ROBOT AND SPINE-LEG-FOOT COUPLING DRIVING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728947
ELECTRIC FOLDING VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728577
SUPPORT FOR A WATERCRAFT
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1270 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month