Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/831,436

Untitled Application

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 24, 2025
Priority
Jul 26, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022107975
Examiner
ORTEGA, JOSEPH
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Cummins Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
314 granted / 432 resolved
+4.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
449
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 432 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kolhatkar (US 2017/0264101). Regarding Claim 1, Kolhatkar discloses a controller [110] to control a generator set [20] to provide a voltage at an output port [outport port at 10] based on a load condition [when utility power system 20 is operating normally (i.e., providing power to load 10), UPS system 100 is configured to provide the auxiliary power output to load 10 to maintain a continuous, predetermined quality of power] (FIG. 1-2, ¶ [0021-0023]), the controller comprising: a. one or more processors [processor] (¶ [0006]; In another aspect, a controller for a UPS system coupled to a load is provided. The controller includes a processor and a memory in communication with said processor) configured to: determine the load condition [UPS is uninterruptable] at the output port [outport port at 10] of an alternator [106] coupled to an engine [108] (Abstract, Claim 1-2, 7; extract alternating current (AC) real power from said DFIG), and generate, based on the load condition [maintain a continuous, predetermined quality of power], a control signal causing the engine to change a speed of the engine to adjust a frequency or a phase of the voltage (Claim 3; control said first inverter to adjust a frequency of the excitation input based on the adjusted rotor speed, wherein the auxiliary power output has a frequency substantially equal to a frequency of a utility power output of the utility power source). Regarding Claim 2, Kolhatkar discloses the controller of claim 1 [see rejected Claim 1], wherein the one or more processors [refer to element “a” in rejected Claim 1] are configured to: detect an amplitude of the voltage, detect a current through the output port, and determine the load condition, based on the amplitude of the voltage and the current (Claim 3; control said first inverter to adjust a frequency of the excitation input based on the adjusted rotor speed, wherein the auxiliary power output has a frequency substantially equal to a frequency of a utility power output of the utility power source). Regarding Claim 3, Kolhatkar discloses the controller of claim 2 [see rejected Claim 2], wherein the load condition includes an impedance [by 26] at the output port [outport port at 10], wherein the one or more processors [refer to element “a” in rejected Claim 1] are configured to: determine an electrical load demand, based on a function of a target amplitude of the voltage and the impedance (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 4, Kolhatkar discloses the controller of claim 3 [see rejected Claim 3], wherein the one or more processors [refer to element “a” in rejected Claim 1] are configured to generate, based on the electrical load demand, another control signal causing the alternator to change the amplitude of the voltage (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 5, Kolhatkar discloses the controller of claim 3 [see rejected Claim 3], wherein the load condition further includes a phase offset between the voltage and the current, wherein the one or more processors [refer to element “a” in rejected Claim 1] are configured to: determine an adjusted electrical load demand, based on the electrical load demand and the phase offset (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 6, Kolhatkar discloses the controller of claim 5 [see rejected Claim 5], wherein the one or more processors [refer to element “a” in rejected Claim 1] are configured to: determine a mechanical power demand corresponding to the adjusted electrical load demand, determine an amount of fuel to provide to the engine, based on the mechanical power demand, and generate the control signal indicating the amount of fuel (¶ [0028]; prime mover 108 includes, for example, and without limitation, a diesel generator, a motor, or another component configured to generate a mechanical rotational torque that drives shaft 116. Shaft 116 drives rotor 114. A rotating magnetic field is induced within rotor 114 and a voltage is induced within stator 112 that is magnetically coupled to rotor 114. DFIG 106 converts the rotational mechanical energy to a sinusoidal, three-phase AC electrical energy signal (referred to herein as an “auxiliary power output”) in stator 112. ¶ [0036]; In at least some embodiments, controller 110 is configured to switch between the modes to optimize fuel usage of prime mover 108 or another operating characteristic of UPS system 100). Regarding Claim 7, Kolhatkar discloses a method of controlling a generator set [20] including a controller [110], an alternator [106], and an engine [108], based on a load condition at an output port [when utility power system 20 is operating normally (i.e., providing power to load 10), UPS system 100 is configured to provide the auxiliary power output to load 10 to maintain a continuous, predetermined quality of power] of the alternator [106] (FIG. 1-2, ¶ [0021-0023]), the method comprising: determining, by the controller [110], the load condition at the output port of the alternator, the alternator configured to generate a voltage at the output port, based on a speed of the engine coupled to the alternator (Claim 3; control said first inverter to adjust a frequency of the excitation input based on the adjusted rotor speed, wherein the auxiliary power output has a frequency substantially equal to a frequency of a utility power output of the utility power source); and generating, by the controller based on the load condition, a control signal to adjust an amplitude of the voltage at the output port (Claim 3; control said first inverter to adjust a frequency of the excitation input based on the adjusted rotor speed, wherein the auxiliary power output has a frequency substantially equal to a frequency of a utility power output of the utility power source). Regarding Claim 8, Kolhatkar discloses the method of claim 7 [see rejected Claim 7], wherein the load condition includes an impedance [by 26] at the output port, wherein the control signal is generated by the controller based on the impedance (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 9, Kolhatkar discloses the method of claim 8 [see rejected Claim 8], further comprising: dividing, by the controller, a value of the voltage by a value of a current through the output port to determine the impedance at the output port (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 10, Kolhatkar discloses the method of claim 8 [see rejected Claim 8], further comprising: determining, by the controller, an electrical load demand based on the impedance, wherein the control signal is generated by the controller based on the electrical load demand (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 11, Kolhatkar discloses the method of claim 10 [see rejected Claim 10], further comprising: generating, by the controller based on the electrical load demand, another control signal to adjust the speed of the engine (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 12, Kolhatkar discloses the method of claim 11 [see rejected Claim 11], further comprising: providing, by the controller, the control signal to an alternator controller [305], the alternator controller to adjust electromotive force provided to the alternator according to the control signal to adjust the amplitude of the voltage at the output port (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 13, Kolhatkar discloses the method of claim 12 [see rejected Claim 12], further comprising: providing, by the controller, the another control signal to an engine controller, the engine controller to adjust an amount of fuel provided to the engine to adjust the speed of the engine according to the another control signal (¶ [0028]; prime mover 108 includes, for example, and without limitation, a diesel generator, a motor, or another component configured to generate a mechanical rotational torque that drives shaft 116. Shaft 116 drives rotor 114. A rotating magnetic field is induced within rotor 114 and a voltage is induced within stator 112 that is magnetically coupled to rotor 114. DFIG 106 converts the rotational mechanical energy to a sinusoidal, three-phase AC electrical energy signal (referred to herein as an “auxiliary power output”) in stator 112. ¶ [0036]; In at least some embodiments, controller 110 is configured to switch between the modes to optimize fuel usage of prime mover 108 or another operating characteristic of UPS system 100). Regarding Claim 14, Kolhatkar discloses the method of claim 11 [see rejected Claim 11], wherein generating, by the controller based on the electrical load demand, the another control signal includes: determining, by the controller, a mechanical power demand corresponding to the electrical load demand; and generating, by the controller, the another control signal according to the determined mechanical power demand (¶ [0028]; prime mover 108 includes, for example, and without limitation, a diesel generator, a motor, or another component configured to generate a mechanical rotational torque that drives shaft 116. Shaft 116 drives rotor 114. A rotating magnetic field is induced within rotor 114 and a voltage is induced within stator 112 that is magnetically coupled to rotor 114. DFIG 106 converts the rotational mechanical energy to a sinusoidal, three-phase AC electrical energy signal (referred to herein as an “auxiliary power output”) in stator 112. ¶ [0036]; In at least some embodiments, controller 110 is configured to switch between the modes to optimize fuel usage of prime mover 108 or another operating characteristic of UPS system 100). Regarding Claim 15, Kolhatkar discloses a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions [Memory device 310 may include one or more tangible, non-transitory, computer readable media] when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform the method 7 (see rejected Claim 7, ¶ [0044]). Regarding Claim 16, Kolhatkar discloses a generator set to provide a voltage at an output port based on a load condition (refer to rejected Claim 1 preamble above), the generator set including: an engine [108] (FIG. 1-2); an alternator [100 or 200] coupled to the engine [108], the alternator [100 or 200] configured to generate the voltage at the output port based on a speed of the engine (FIG. 1-2, Claim 1; control said first inverter to provide an excitation input to said rotor in response to the detected power disturbance, wherein said DFIG is further configured to provide the auxiliary power output to the load at least partially as a function of the excitation input.); and a controller [110] coupled to the engine [108] and the alternator [106] (FIG. 1-2), the controller configured to: determine an impedance [by 26] at the output port, generate, based on the impedance, a first control signal causing the engine to change a speed to adjust a frequency or a phase of the voltage, and generate, based on the impedance, a second control signal causing the alternator to change an amplitude of the voltage (Claim 3; control said first inverter to adjust a frequency of the excitation input based on the adjusted rotor speed, wherein the auxiliary power output has a frequency substantially equal to a frequency of a utility power output of the utility power source). Regarding Claim 17, Kolhatkar discloses the generator set of claim 16 [see rejected Claim 16], wherein the controller is configured to generate, based on the impedance, the first control signal indicating an amount of fuel to supply to the engine (¶ [0028]; prime mover 108 includes, for example, and without limitation, a diesel generator, a motor, or another component configured to generate a mechanical rotational torque that drives shaft 116. Shaft 116 drives rotor 114. A rotating magnetic field is induced within rotor 114 and a voltage is induced within stator 112 that is magnetically coupled to rotor 114. DFIG 106 converts the rotational mechanical energy to a sinusoidal, three-phase AC electrical energy signal (referred to herein as an “auxiliary power output”) in stator 112. ¶ [0036]; In at least some embodiments, controller 110 is configured to switch between the modes to optimize fuel usage of prime mover 108 or another operating characteristic of UPS system 100). Regarding Claim 18, Kolhatkar discloses the generator set of claim 17 [see rejected Claim 17], further comprising: an engine controller [305] coupled to the engine, the engine controller configured to: receive the first control signal indicating the amount of fuel, and provide the amount of fuel indicated by the first control signal to the engine to change the speed of the engine based on the impedance (¶ [0028]; prime mover 108 includes, for example, and without limitation, a diesel generator, a motor, or another component configured to generate a mechanical rotational torque that drives shaft 116. Shaft 116 drives rotor 114. A rotating magnetic field is induced within rotor 114 and a voltage is induced within stator 112 that is magnetically coupled to rotor 114. DFIG 106 converts the rotational mechanical energy to a sinusoidal, three-phase AC electrical energy signal (referred to herein as an “auxiliary power output”) in stator 112. ¶ [0036]; In at least some embodiments, controller 110 is configured to switch between the modes to optimize fuel usage of prime mover 108 or another operating characteristic of UPS system 100. ¶ [0042]; exemplary computing device 305 that may be used to monitor and/or control the operation of a UPS system such as UPS systems 100, 200 (shown in FIGS. 1 and 2)). Regarding Claim 19, Kolhatkar discloses the generator set of claim 16 [see rejected Claim 16], wherein the controller is configured to generate, based on the impedance, the second control signal indicating an amount of electromotive force of the alternator (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage). Regarding Claim 20, Kolhatkar discloses the generator set of claim 19 [see rejected Claim 19], further comprising: an alternator controller [305] coupled to the alternator (¶ [0042]; exemplary computing device 305 that may be used to monitor and/or control the operation of a UPS system such as UPS systems 100, 200 (shown in FIGS. 1 and 2)), the alternator controller configured to: receive the second control signal indicating the amount of electromotive force of the alternator (¶ [0021]; Utility power system 20 includes a utility power source 22, a switch 24, an inductor 26, and a static bypass 28 serially coupled to each other. Utility power source 22 generates a utility power output for one or more loads (including load 10). In the exemplary embodiment, the utility power output is a three-phase alternating current (AC) power output. For example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 60 hertz (Hz), 208 volts root-means-squared (Vrms) phase-to-phase voltage. In another example, the utility power output is a three-phase, 50 Hz, 400 Vrms phase-to-phase voltage. Alternatively, the utility power output may include a different number of phases, frequency, and/or peak voltage), and provide the amount of electromotive force indicated by the second control signal to the alternator to change the amplitude of the voltage based on the load condition (Claim 3; control said first inverter to adjust a frequency of the excitation input based on the adjusted rotor speed, wherein the auxiliary power output has a frequency substantially equal to a frequency of a utility power output of the utility power source). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH ORTEGA whose telephone number is (469)295-9083. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TULSIDAS C. PATEL can be reached at (571)272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH ORTEGA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 24, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742435
Modular Underwater Pumped-Storage Power Plant Reservoir
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744374
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BREAKER OPERATION IN POWER SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732033
STATOR CORE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12719221
Electrical Connector
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12712317
MULTI-CLICK ANTI-BACKOUT ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 432 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month