Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/832,268

POWER SUPPLY FOR A LOCAL CONSUMER LOAD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 23, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2022052207
Examiner
SHECHTMAN, SEAN P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Essity Hygiene And Health Aktiebolag
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
664 granted / 883 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
898
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§103
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-7, 18, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0164040 to Ohkubo, supplied by applicant. 1, 18. A power supply unit for a local consumer load (The power source control unit 5 illustrated in Fig.2 supplies a sensor 4) comprising: an electrical power generating device configured to generate power from the environment and to provide first electrical power (According to [0036], the power generator 6 is a solar battery); an electrical energy storage configured to store electrical energy and to provide second electrical power (The battery 7); an electric buffer configured to receive and to buffer said first and said second electric power, and to provide a buffer output power (The capacitor 9 acts as a buffer for the voltage regulator 10, according to [0037]); and an output power regulator configured to provide an output power to a load device at a nominal output voltage from said buffer output power (The regulator 10 outputs a stabilised voltage to the sensor 4, according to [0037]), and to adjust said nominal output voltage based on an amount of energy stored by said electrical energy storage, wherein the output power regulator is configured to adjust the nominal output voltage after the output voltage is delivered from the output power regulator (Abstract, “For example, when power supplying from the battery continues for a predetermined time, a processing for extending the operation interval of the sensor node or a processing for putting the sensor node in a continuous standby state is performed, thereby reducing the wasteful power consumption of the battery.”; According to [0085], with reference to Fig. 6, the voltage of the battery 7 is compared to the voltage output by the generator 6 using a comparator 18; the comparison is used to determine whether power is drawn from the generator 6; based on this information, the output of the regulator 10 is controlled; in particular, as detailed in [0074], in relation to Fig. 3, 4, the sensor is in a standby state in case the generator 6 is not used for more than a predetermined time); wherein the load device is configured to: report acquired data toward a data processor; measure a value of the voltage of said output power; compile a report message further based on a result of said measuring the voltage of said output power; and transmit said compiled message to the data processor. 2. The power supply unit according to claim 1, wherein said output power regulator is configured to decrease said nominal output voltage by a predetermined output voltage drop when the stored amount of energy falls below a predetermined threshold (paragraphs 3, 37, 85, 91; claim 8). 3. The power supply unit according to claim 1, wherein said electrical energy storage is configured to provide said second electrical power at an energy storage voltage which changes at least in relation to some amounts of energy stored (paragraph 35-62, 71-74, 83-97). 4. The power supply unit according to claim 3, wherein said output power regulator is configured to determine an amount of energy stored by said electrical energy storage based on said energy storage voltage (paragraph 35-62, 71-74, 83-97). 5. The power supply unit according to claim 1, wherein said power generating device comprises any one of an energy harvesting element, a solar cell, a solar panel, a thermal energy cell, and a radio wave harvester (paragraph 35, 43, 45, 73, 95, 97, 104-112). 6. The power supply unit according to claim 1, wherein said electrical energy storage comprises any one of a battery, a rechargeable battery, and a super capacitor (paragraph 35-62, 71-74, 83-97). 7. The power supply unit according to claim 1, wherein said electricity buffer comprises any one of an electrolytic capacitor, a tantalum capacitor, a high-capacity capacitor, a rechargeable battery, a super capacitor, and an ultracap (paragraph 35-37, 51, 79-97). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 8, 10-17 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Ohkubo fails to disclose all the claimed features of applicant’s instant invention, specifically including: 8. wherein the processing unit is configured to measure a value of the voltage of said output power and to compile the message based on a result of said measuring the voltage of said output power. It is for these reasons that applicant’s invention defines over the prior art of record. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/11/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues Ohkubo fails to teach adjusting the nominal output voltage of the output voltage based on an amount of energy stored by said electrical energy storage. The examiner disagrees. Ohkubo teaches the comparison of the battery voltage to generator voltage is used to determine whether power is drawn from the generator, and based on this information, the output of the regulator is controlled, wherein, in relation to Fig. 3 and 4, the sensor is in a standby state in case that the generator is not used for more than a predetermined time (Abstract, “For example, when power supplying from the battery continues for a predetermined time, a processing for extending the operation interval of the sensor node or a processing for putting the sensor node in a continuous standby state is performed, thereby reducing the wasteful power consumption of the battery.”; The regulator 10 outputs a stabilised voltage to the sensor 4, according to [0037]; According to [0085], with reference to Fig. 6, the voltage of the battery 7 is compared to the voltage output by the generator 6 using a comparator 18; the comparison is used to determine whether power is drawn from the generator 6; based on this information, the output of the regulator 10 is controlled; in particular, as detailed in [0074], in relation to Fig. 3, 4, the sensor is in a standby state in case the generator 6 is not used for more than a predetermined time), which reads on adjusting the nominal output voltage of the output voltage based on an amount of energy stored by said electrical energy storage. Applicant argues Ohkubo fails to teach a power supply unit configured to provide an output power to a load device… wherein said load device is configured to: report acquired data toward a data processor; measure a value of the voltage of said output power; compile a report message further based on a result of said measuring the voltage of said output power; and transmit said compiled message to the data processor. The examiner submits that the load device is not claimed as being part of the power supply unit and in fact, the power supply unit is configured to provide output power to the load device, therefore the configuration of the load device does not limit the scope of the power supply unit. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN P SHECHTMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3754. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-6:00pm, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Kraig can be reached at 571-272-8660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Sean Shechtman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 11, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748403
STATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, STATE MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748401
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTOMATE CNC PROGRAMMING
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749885
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UTILIZING ELECTRICITY MONITORING DEVICES TO MITIGATE OR PREVENT STRUCTURAL DAMAGE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734642
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ABRASIVE FLOW IN A PNEUMATIC BLASTING SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736957
INTELLIGENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONTROL PLATFORM FOR SECONDARY POWER SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+22.3%)
3y 1m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month