Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/832,521

Package for a Sterile Medical Device and Assembly Method

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Priority
Feb 04, 2022 — provisional 63/306,563 +2 more
Examiner
REYNOLDS, STEVEN ALAN
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Becton, Dickinson and Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
1143 granted / 1734 resolved
-4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1734 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9/14/2026 has been entered. Claims 15-19 remain withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 is rendered indefinite by the limitation “an inner surface of the at least one first web”, in line 3, since it is unclear if the inner surface is the same as that defined in line 4 of claim 1 or a different inner surface. Examiner suggest replacing “an inner surface of the at least one first web” with “the inner surface of the at least one first web”. Election/Restrictions This application is in condition for allowance except for the presence of claims 15-19 directed to an invention non-elected with traverse in the reply filed on 11/10/2025. Examiner suggests canceling claims 15-19, or alternatively, amend claim 15 to include all the limitations of allowable claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 and 9-14 are allowed. Claim 8 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art does not disclose the two webs of compressed, foldable paper having porous and/or rough areas on their inner surfaces, wherein an interference engagement between the inner surfaces forms a gap which forms a tortuous path between the webs enabling a sterilization gas ingress while providing a barrier preventing microbial ingress, in combination with the other structural limitations of the claim. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN A REYNOLDS whose telephone number is (571)272-9959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571) 272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN A. REYNOLDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed
May 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751242
COVER FOR A WAFER
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741801
INSULATED BOX
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741795
HOME HARDWARE PACKAGE ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734009
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PACKAGING AND PREPARING A RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION KIT
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722843
PERSONALIZED VALUE ITEM PACKAGING
5y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+23.3%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1734 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month