Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/832,854

MAGNETIC SENSOR SYSTEM, AND DISTANCE MEASURING METHOD FOR THE MAGNETIC SENSOR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Priority
Jan 28, 2022 — JP 2022-012418 +1 more
Examiner
HAWKINS, DOMINIC E
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
640 granted / 735 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
754
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
86.0%
+46.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 735 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Detailed Action The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-5 of U.S. Application 18/832,854 filed on July 24, 2024 are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/24/2024 has been considered by the examiner. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Momose et al (JP2021076487) in view of Kaneko et al (JP2012253887). PNG media_image1.png 540 457 media_image1.png Greyscale Prior Art: Momose Regarding claim 1, Momose discloses a magnetic sensor system (shown in figs 1-6) comprising: a magnetic sensor (10); a magnetic scale (2a) disposed alongside of the magnetic sensor in a first direction (x-direction) and configured to move relative to the magnetic sensor in a second direction (y-direction) intersecting with the first direction (par 15-17, and 26 discloses intersecting the movement of the sensor and the scale);; and a controller (8) configured to receive the moving distance information and give a movement instruction to either the magnetic sensor or the magnetic scale (par 34 discloses moving values based on 2a), the circuitry including a hysteresis corrector (845-847), the controller being configured to provide the hysteresis corrector with moving direction information about either the magnetic sensor or the magnetic scale (par 42 discloses compensating displacement when the movement in reverse), and the hysteresis corrector being configured to transform the output signal into the moving distance information by making hysteresis correction to the output signal based on the moving direction information (pars 37, 38, and 42 discloses compensation based on movement which is then processed and outputted). Momose does not fully disclose a transformer configured to receive an output signal of the magnetic sensor and transform the output signal into moving distance information. However, Kaneko discloses a transformer (using 30) configured to receive an output signal of the magnetic sensor and transform the output signal into moving distance information (par 30-34 discloses converter 30 converting signals from 10 to digital. Par 11 discloses measuring direction of movement of the detected position).It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Momose in view of Kaneko in order to determine distance based on the corrected value. Regarding claim 5, Momose discloses a distance measuring method (abstract discloses being an encoder) for use in a magnetic sensor system (figs 1-6), the magnetic sensor system including: a magnetic sensor (10); and a magnetic scale (2a) disposed alongside of the magnetic sensor in a first direction (x-direction) and configured to move relative to the magnetic sensor in a second direction (y-direction) intersecting with the first direction (par 15-17, and 26 discloses intersecting the movement of the sensor and the scale), the distance measuring method comprising, the transformation step including a correction step (using845-847) including transforming the output signal into the moving distance information by making hysteresis correction to the output signal based on the moving direction information about either the magnetic sensor or the magnetic scale (par 42 discloses compensating displacement when the movement in reverse).Momose does not fully disclose a transformation step including transforming an output signal of the magnetic sensor into moving distance information about either the magnetic sensor or the magnetic scale. However, Kaneko discloses a transformation step (using 30) including transforming an output signal of the magnetic sensor into moving distance information about either the magnetic sensor or the magnetic scale (par 30-34 discloses converter 30 converting signals from 10 to digital. Par 11 discloses measuring direction of movement of the detected position). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Momose in view of Kaneko in order to determine distance based on the corrected value. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, the prior art of record taken alone or in combination fail to teach or suggest a magnetic sensor system comprising: wherein the output signal includes: a first output signal as an output signal for a steady-state region; and a second output signal as an output signal for a transitional region immediately following a point where either the magnetic sensor or the magnetic scale changes its moving direction, and the hysteresis corrector is configured to make the hysteresis correction differently to the steady-state region and the transitional region in accordance with the moving direction information in combination with the other limitations of the claim. Claims 3 and 4 are also objected to as they depend on claim 2. Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kaufmann et al (USPUb 20130134967): discloses hysteresis of the sensor. Hosek et al (USPGPub 20090224750): discloses multi-dimension position sensor. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOMINIC E HAWKINS whose telephone number is (571)272-2647. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached at (571) 272-2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOMINIC E HAWKINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638477
HIGH CURRENT MEASURING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631682
Two-Phase Helium Convection Loop for Cryogenic Cooling
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631668
SENSOR DEVICE AND SENSOR ARRANGEMENT FOR DETERMINING AN ELECTRICALLY INDUCED MAGNETIC FIELD
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625170
LOCALIZED IR DROP DETECTION AND CALIBRATION SCHEME TO CREATE HIGH ACCURACY VOLTAGE SUPPLY ACROSS PHYSICAL CIRCUIT PARTITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE GAIN
3y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618694
PROXIMITY SENSOR AND ANTENNA
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 735 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month