Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/832,967

MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE, HYBRID SYSTEM, MECHANICALLY AND ELECTRICALLY INTEGRATED UNIT, AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Priority
May 18, 2022 — JP 2022-081763 +1 more
Examiner
BOUZIANE, SAID
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hitachi Astemo Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
446 granted / 580 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
595
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
74.0%
+34.0% vs TC avg
§102
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 580 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed on 7/25/2024 has been considered. An initialed copy of form 1449 is enclosed herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1- 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 1 recites the limitation “carrier frequency adjustment unit adjusts the carrier frequency so that the carrier frequency in a case where the motor is in a state of co-rotation drive becomes higher than the carrier frequency in a case where the motor is not in the state of co-rotation drive.” Claim 12 recites the limitation “an absolute value of the torque instruction is equal to or smaller than a given threshold, the motor control device generates a PWM pulse signal for controlling operation of the inverter so that harmonic pulsation of a gap magnetic flux density between a stator and a rotor of the motor is suppressed.” It’s not clear how the carrier frequency adjustment unit adjusts the carrier frequency to new value in claim 1 and how the PWM pulse signal generate a new pulse in claim 12; the claims only recites the function and result of the apparatus operation “so that the carrier frequency…” in claim 1 and “so that harmonic pulsation…” in claim 12. The structure which goes to make up the device must be clearly and positively specified. The structure must be organized and correlated in such a manner as to present a complete operative device. The limitation “so that the carrier frequency…” in claim 1 and “so that harmonic pulsation…” recited in claims 1 and 11 renders the claims indefinite, because the claims includes elements and functions not actually disclosed (those encompassed by how the carrier frequency is adjusted in claim 1 and by how the PWM pulse signal generate a new pulse in claim 12), thereby rendering the claims confusing, vague, and indefinite. Claims 2- 11 are rejected by virtue of its dependency on claim 1, thereby containing all the limitations of the claim on which they depend. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1- 9 and 12- 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Saha et al. (US 20090115362 A1). Re. claim 1, Saha discloses a motor control device (30m) connected to an inverter (19) that converts DC power (18) into AC power and that outputs the AC power to a motor (10), the motor control device (30m) controlling operation of the inverter (19) according to a torque instruction (motor target torque TM*m), thereby controlling drive of the motor (10), using the inverter (19), the motor control device comprising: a carrier wave generation unit that generates a carrier wave; a carrier frequency adjustment unit (carrier frequency unit 44) that adjusts a carrier frequency that is a frequency of the carrier wave (¶. [0053]); and a PWM control unit (50) that performs pulse width modulation of a voltage instruction (Vu*, Vv*, Vw*), using the carrier wave (Frf), to generate a PWM pulse signal (Mu,Mv,Mw) for controlling operation of the inverter (19), wherein the carrier frequency adjustment unit adjusts the carrier frequency so that the carrier frequency in a case where the motor is in a state of co-rotation drive becomes higher than the carrier frequency in a case where the motor is not in the state of co-rotation drive (¶. [0060]- [0070] and Figs. 5- 10). Re. Claim 12, Saha discloses a motor control device (30m) connected to an inverter (19) that converts DC power (18) into AC power and that outputs the AC power to a motor (10), the motor control device (30m) controlling operation of the inverter (19) according to a torque instruction (motor target torque TM*m), thereby controlling drive of the motor (10), using the inverter (19), wherein when an absolute value of the torque instruction is equal to or smaller than a given threshold, the motor control device generates a PWM pulse signal for controlling operation of the inverter so that harmonic pulsation of a gap magnetic flux density between a stator and a rotor of the motor is suppressed (¶. [0060]- [0070] and Figs. 5- 10). Re. claim 2, Saha discloses wherein the carrier frequency adjustment unit compares an absolute value of the torque instruction with a given threshold (TM*mmax, FIGS. 7 to 9), and when the absolute value of the torque instruction is equal to or smaller than the threshold , determines that the motor is in a state of co-rotation drive (¶. [0060]- [0070] and Figs. 5- 10). Re. claim 3, Saha discloses wherein the threshold is determined based on a result of an electromagnetic field analysis simulation or an experiment conducted in advance (see electromagnetic field analysis simulation or an experiment ¶. [0060]- [0070] and Figs. 5- 10). Re. claims 4- 5, Fig. 7 shows PWM is disconnected at small value of the torque. Re. claim 6 , Saha discloses wherein the carrier frequency in a case where the motor is in a state of co-rotation drive is determined based on at least either a process load of the motor control device or a capacity of a gate power supply that supplies power to a gate drive circuit included in the inverter (¶. [0060]- [0070] and Figs. 5- 10). Re. claim 7 , Saha discloses wherein the motor control device controls drive of the motor so that an induced voltage generated by rotation of the motor is smaller than a withstand voltage of a switching element of the inverter (¶. [0027]). Re. claim 8 , Saha discloses a current control unit (35) that calculates the voltage instruction (Vd* Vq*) in every given calculation cycle ,wherein the carrier frequency adjustment unit adjusts the carrier frequency in a case where the motor is in a state of co-rotation drive such that the calculation cycle is longer than half of a cycle of the carrier wave (Fig. 2). Re. claim 9 , Saha discloses wherein the carrier frequency adjustment unit adjusts the carrier frequency so that a rate of change of the carrier frequency is equal to or smaller than a given value (Figs. 5- 10). Re. claims 13- 15, Refer to functional structure of the motor control device 30m figs. 1 and 2. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAID BOUZIANE whose telephone number is (571)272-7592. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6:00-15:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at Colon-Santana. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAID BOUZIANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683524
Control method for braking an electric motor, control method for controlling an electric drive unit and computer program product
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676565
POSITION CONTROL OF MECHANICALLY PARALLELED ELECTRICAL DRIVES WITHOUT INTERCOMMUNICATION BUSES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671355
FIELD-ORIENTED SENSORLESS BRUSHLESS MOTOR CONTROL IN A POWER TOOL
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668228
MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE, ELECTROMECHANICAL INTEGRATED UNIT, HYBRID SYSTEM, ELECTRIC POWER STEERING SYSTEM, AND MOTOR CONTROL METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658828
MOTOR DRIVING DEVICE AND BRAKING CONTROL METHOD PERFORMED BY THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 580 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month