Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/833,015

SPATIAL REUSE FOR ACCESS POINTS ADVERTISING MULTIPLE MBSSID SETS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Priority
Feb 08, 2022 — provisional 63/307,916 +1 more
Examiner
MAGLOIRE, ELISABETH BENOIT
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
735 granted / 819 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
827
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 819 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION 1. The following Office Action is based on the application filed on 25 July 2024, having claims 1-20 and drawing figures 1-6. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 2. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections 3. Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: The acronym VAP recited in line 1 of claim 9 must be written as “virtual access point (VAP)” the first time it is recited in the claim because claim 1 upon which claim 9 depends does not recite the acronym VAP. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “any BSS colors” in line 8. The limitation renders the claim vague and indefinite because the word “any” has several meanings. “Any” may mean “at least one of,” “some,” or “all.” Therefore, the claim must recite a more definite word. It is suggested that the limitation recites “all BSS colors” to encompass all BSS colors associated with the second access point. Claim 2 recites the limitation “any BSS colors” in lines 3 and 6. The limitation renders the claim vague and indefinite because the word “any” has several meanings. “Any” may mean “at least one of,” “some,” or “all.” Therefore, the claim must recite a more definite word. It is suggested that the limitation recites “all BSS colors” to encompass all BSS colors associated with the second access point. Claim 10 recites the limitation “any BSS colors” in lines 11 and 14-15. The limitation renders the claim vague and indefinite because the word “any” has several meanings. “Any” may mean “at least one of,” “some,” or “all.” Therefore, the claim must recite a more definite word. It is suggested that the limitation recites “all BSS colors” to encompass all BSS colors associated with the second access point. Claim 11 recites the limitation “any BSS colors” in line 3. The limitation renders the claim vague and indefinite because the word “any” has several meanings. “Any” may mean “at least one of,” “some,” or “all.” Therefore, the claim must recite a more definite word. It is suggested that the limitation recites “all BSS colors” to encompass all BSS colors associated with the second access point. Claim 17 recites the limitation “any BSS colors” in line 9. The limitation renders the claim vague and indefinite because the word “any” has several meanings. “Any” may mean “at least one of,” “some,” or “all.” Therefore, the claim must recite a more definite word. It is suggested that the limitation recites “all BSS colors” to encompass all BSS colors associated with the second access point. Claim 18 recites the limitation “any BSS colors” in lines 4 and 7. The limitation renders the claim vague and indefinite because the word “any” has several meanings. “Any” may mean “at least one of,” “some,” or “all.” Therefore, the claim must recite a more definite word. It is suggested that the limitation recites “all BSS colors” to encompass all BSS colors associated with the second access point. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion 6. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 form. The closest prior art references are Dakshinkar et al. (US 2021/0360479 A1), Cherian et al. (US 2019/0208423 A1), and Cariou et al. (US 2017/0255659 A1). Dakshinkar discloses enabling by an access point (AP) a dynamic basis service set (BSS) color feature for operation with multiple virtual access points (VAPs) hosted by the AP (abstract). Cherian discloses that spatial reuse (SR) information may indicate that a group of STAs associated with a second access point (AP) may reuse resources associated with a first AP (abstract) wherein the SR information may indicate a partial BSSID bitmap, an SRG partial BSSID bitmap [0108]. The SR information may also indicate color information associated with an SRG identifier [0108]. Cariou discloses determines that an inter-BSS PDU is an SRG PPDU if it comprises a BSS color field and a bit of the SRG BSS color bitmap corresponds to a value of the BSS Color field is set (abstract). 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Elisabeth B Magloire whose telephone number is (571)272-5601. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 AM-5 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sujoy K Kundu can be reached at 571-272-8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELISABETH BENOIT MAGLOIRE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2471
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12720352
METHOD FOR MEASUREMENT RELAXATION AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720401
WIRELESS ACCESS POINT ROUTE SELECTION POLICY DISTRIBUTION FOR END-TO-END NETWORK SLICING
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713488
TECHNIQUES FOR DIRECT SECONDARY CELL ACTIVATION USING TEMPORARY REFERENCE SIGNALS
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12696351
MULTICAST SERVICE RECEIVING METHOD, MULTICAST SERVICE CONFIGURATION METHOD, TERMINAL, AND NETWORK SIDE DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12666480
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR OPERATING LINK AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 7m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 819 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month