Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/833,259

APPARATUS FOR INSPECTING INSULATION STATE OF PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE, AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING INSULATION STATE BY USING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Priority
Apr 18, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0047492 +1 more
Examiner
RODAK, LEE E
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hanwha Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
268 granted / 372 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
372
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 372 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Amendment The amendments filed on 05/27/2026 have been fully considered and are made of record. Claims 1, 6 have been amended. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed on 05/27/2026, with respect to claims 1 and 14 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore the rejection sent on of Office Acton mailed on 03/10/2026 has been withdrawn and new ground(s) of rejection has been applied. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by WEI et al. (Patent NO. CN 110161314 (A); hereinafter Wei; translation attached). Regarding Claim 1, Wei teaches a device for checking the insulation status of a photovoltaic module (device in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; Se [0026]-[0030]), the device comprising: a photovoltaic module (PV in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]); a bridge circuit connected to the photovoltaic module (See the bridge circuit connected to PV in Fig. 1 and fig. below; See [0026]-[0035]) and having two first resistors connected in series (R1 and R2 are connected in series in fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]) and two second resistors connected in series wherein the two first resistors (R3 and R4 are connected in series in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]) and the two second resistors are connected in parallel (R1/R2 are in parallel with R3/R$ in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]); a sensor unit detecting a PV voltage of the photovoltaic module (PV voltage is U; See [0027]) and a bridge voltage between a first node as a contact of the two first resistors and a second node as a contact of the two second resistors (first node PVSO+ and second node PVSO- in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]-[0030]); a relay connected between the first node or the second node and the ground (See the relay connects second node of r to ground in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0027]); a controller closing or opening the relay (See [0037]-[0040]); and a calculation unit calculating an insulation resistance (insulation resistance R_G; See [0030]-[0035]) between the photovoltaic module and the ground based on the PV voltage and the bridge voltage (PV voltage is U and bridge voltage is Ur; See [0030]-[0035]). PNG media_image1.png 518 1144 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, Wei teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the bridge circuit is configured such that a third node as one of the contacts of the two first resistors and two second resistors is connected to a positive terminal of the photovoltaic module (node of R3 is connected to PV+ on Fig. 1), and a fourth node as the other contact is connected to a negative terminal of the photovoltaic module (node of R4 is connected to BUS- in fig. 1). Regarding Claim 3, Wei teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the sensor unit is configured to detect the PV voltage and the bridge voltage when the relay is closed (See [0016], [0030]-[0036]). Regarding Claim 4, Wei teaches the device of claim 1, further comprising: a determination unit determining the insulation status of the photovoltaic module based on the insulation resistance (See [0035]-[0036]). Regarding Claim 5, Wei teaches the device of claim 4, wherein the determination unit is configured to determine that the photovoltaic module has an abnormal insulation status when the insulation resistance is less than a reference value (See [0035]-[0036]). Regarding Claim 6, Wei teaches the device of claim 2, wherein the calculation unit is configured to calculate a first insulation resistance between the third node (R_G is third node and ground in Fig. 1; See [0030]-[0035]) and the ground or a second insulation resistance between the fourth node and the ground depending on the polarity of the bridge voltage. Regarding Claim 7, Wei teaches the device of claim 6, wherein the calculation unit is configured to calculate the first insulation resistance when the bridge voltage is a negative voltage (See [0030]-[0036]), or the second insulation resistance when the bridge voltage is a positive voltage. Regarding Claim 8, Wei teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the bridge circuit further comprises: a bridge resistor connected between the first node and second node (bridge resistor r is connected to first node PVSO+ and second node PVSO- in Fig. 1), and the sensor unit detects a voltage across the bridge resistor as the bridge voltage (See [0031]). Regarding Claim 9, Wei teaches the device of claim 8, wherein the calculation unit is configured to calculate the insulation resistance based on the resistance values of the first resistors, the second resistors, and the bridge resistor, the PV voltage, and the bridge voltage (See [0030]-[0037]). Regarding Claim 13, Wei teaches the device of claim 1, further comprising: a level conversion unit converting the PV voltage and the bridge voltage into a level that the calculation unit is able to process and providing the same to the calculation unit (voltage to current conversion and resistance to current conversion; See [0030]-[0037]). Regarding Claim 14, Wei teaches a method of checking the insulation status of a photovoltaic module (method in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; Se [0026]-[0030]), performed by a device for checking the insulation status of the photovoltaic module (PV in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]), the method comprising: individually storing resistance values of two first resistors connected in series (R1 and R2 are connected in series in fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]), two second resistors connected in series (R3 and R4 are connected in series in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]), a bridge resistor of a bridge circuit connected to the photovoltaic module (bridge resistor r is connected to bridge circuit and PV+ in Fig. 1; Se [0026]-[0037]); while a relay, connected between a first node as a contact of the two first resistors or a second node as a contact of the two second resistors and a ground, is closed (See the relay connects second node of r to ground in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0027], [0030]-[0037]), detecting a PV voltage of the photovoltaic module (PV voltage is U; See [0027]) and a bridge voltage between the first node and the second node (first node PVSO+ and second node PVSO- in Fig. 1 and Fig. below; See [0026]-[0030]); calculating an insulation resistance (insulation resistance R_G; See [0030]-[0035]) of the photovoltaic module based on the resistance values of the first resistors, the second resistors, and the bridge resistor, the PV voltage, and the bridge voltage (PV voltage is U and bridge voltage is Ur; See [0030]-[0035]); and determining being in a normal insulation status when the insulation resistance is a reference resistance value or more (See [0035]-[0036]). PNG media_image1.png 518 1144 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim(s) 10-12 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wei in view of Willenberg et al. (Pub NO. US 2017/0343593 A1; hereinafter Willenberg). Regarding Claim 10, Wei teaches the device of claim 1. Wei teaches further teaches the first node and second node and relay (See nodes of resistors and relay K1 in fig. 1). However, Wei is silent about wherein the sensor unit is configured to detect an offset voltage between the first node and second node when the relay is opened. Willenberg teaches regarding determining insulation resistance of PV (See abstract) wherein the sensor unit is configured to detect an offset voltage (See [0020]-[0022], [0028]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill n the art before the claimed invention was made to modify the system of Wei and Willenberg by using the sensor unit is configured to detect an offset voltage between the first node and second node when the relay is opened in order to precisely detect insulation resistance (Willenberg; [0029]). Regarding Claim 11, Wei in view of Willenberg teaches the device of claim 10. Willenberg further comprising: an offset correction unit correcting the bridge voltage by reflecting the offset voltage on the bridge voltage (See [0020]-[0022], [0028]). Regarding Claim 12, Wei in view of Willenberg teaches the device of claim 11. Willenberg wherein the calculation unit is configured to calculate the insulation resistance based on the bridge voltage corrected by the offset correction unit (See [0020]-[0022], [0028]). Regarding Claim 15, Wei teaches the method of claim 14. Wei further teaches the first node and second node and relay (See nodes of resistor r and relay in fig. 1). However,Wei is silent about wherein the detecting step further comprises: detecting an offset voltage between the first node and the second node in a state of the relay being opened; and correcting the bridge voltage based on the offset voltage. Willenberg teaches regarding determining insulation resistance of PV (See abstract) wherein the sensor unit is configured to detect an offset voltage (See [0020]-[0022], [0028]); and correcting the bridge voltage based on the offset voltage (See [0020]-[0022], [0028]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill n the art before the claimed invention was made to modify the system of Wei and Willenberg by using the sensor unit is configured to detect an offset voltage between the first node and second node when the relay is opened; and correcting the bridge voltage based on the offset voltage in order to precisely detect insulation resistance (Willenberg; [0029]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Bowden et al. (Pub NO. US 2021/0376788 A1) discloses Self-Powered Voltage Ramp for Photovoltaic. Urabe et al. (Patent NO. US 10,483,763 B2) discloses Photovoltaic Device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZANNATUL FERDOUS whose telephone number is (571)270-0399. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 8am to 5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rodak Lee can be reached at 571-270-5628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZANNATUL FERDOUS/Examiner, Art Unit 2858 /LEE E RODAK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 27, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12415429
INDUCTIVE POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM AND METHOD
11y 3m to grant Granted Sep 16, 2025
Patent 12020829
CLAD WIRE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CLAD WIRES
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 25, 2024
Patent 11994566
MAGNETIC SENSOR AND ITS MANUFACTURING METHOD
1y 5m to grant Granted May 28, 2024
Patent 11965912
PROBE CARD DEVICE HAVING A PROBE STRUCTURE WITH A PROTRUSION PORTION
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 23, 2024
Patent 11953521
PROBE CARD
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 09, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
2y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 372 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month