Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/833,525

METHOD FOR OPERATING A BRAKE SYSTEM ASSEMBLY, AND BRAKE SYSTEM ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Examiner
HUYNH, HAI H
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
1154 granted / 1236 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1247
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§102
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1236 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 11-13, 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) providing input data for the evaluation device (additional element); evaluating the input data with the evaluation device; and downgrading from the first mode to the second mode according to the result of the evaluation (judgement); wherein the input data is a performance curve of the first mode and providing the performance curve comprises ascertaining a torque-speed curve (observation), providing a first mode-dependent characteristic curve, calculating the performance curve from the torque-speed curve and the first mode- dependent characteristic curve using at least one mathematical formula (mathematical concept); wherein evaluating the input data comprises comparing (evaluation) an ascertained performance capability of the first mode according to the calculated performance curve with the performance capability of the second mode; wherein the first mode-dependent characteristic curve is provided by ascertaining the derivative of a second mode-dependent characteristic curve via differential calculation or a derivative function (mathematical concept). The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the limitations perform abstract idea of observation, evaluation, judgement and mathematical concept without a control unit. There is no transformation (no control of the brake based on the determined values). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAI H HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)272-4844. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 AM-4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay M Low can be reached at 571-272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAI H HUYNH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600294
TANKER TRUCK WITH REAR LIGHTING ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600346
BRAKE-TO-STEER LATERAL STABILITY MANAGEMENT BASED ON STABILITY INDICATOR CORRELATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600328
Trailer Vehicle Control System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589656
TRAILER BRAKE GAIN BASED ON REGENERATIVE BRAKE CAPACITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583398
Positioning Assist Device and Positioning Assist Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1236 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month