Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/833,921

SHIELD CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 29, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2022 — JP 2022-012597 +1 more
Examiner
MACCHIAROLO, LEAH SIMONE
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
354 granted / 567 resolved
-5.6% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
575
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 567 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 29 July 2024 has been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Duesterhoeft (US 2014/0099522; hereinafter ‘Duesterhoeft’). Regarding claim 1, Duesterhoeft discloses a shield connector[at least header assembly 100/coaxial connector system 10; Figs. 1, 2, 4–6; as found in at least paragraphs [0016]–[0020] and [0040]–[0043]] comprising: an inner conductor [at least center contact 112; Figs. 2, 4–6; as found in at least paragraphs [0020], [0028], [0040], and [0043]]; an outer conductor that surrounds the inner conductor [at least outer housing 110, outer contact 120, rear shell 122, bore 140, receptacle 132; Figs 2, 4–6; as found in at least paragraphs [0020], [0022]–[0026], and [0043]]; and a dielectric body disposed between the inner conductor and the outer conductor [at least dielectric body 114 received in outer contact 120 and surrounding center contact 112; Figs. 2, 4–6; as found in at least paragraphs [0020], [0026], [0029]–[0030], [0040], and [0043]], wherein the outer conductor includes a bottom surface [at least open bottom/bottom 128 of rear shell 122; Figs. 2 and 5; as found in at least paragraphs [0023]–[0025] and [0043]], a back surface intersecting the bottom surface [at least rear shell 122 and side walls 130 extending rearward from front wall 124; Figs. 2, 5, and 6; as found in at least paragraph [0023]], a mount portion formed on the bottom surface and bonded to a surface of a circuit substrate through soldering [at least mounting posts 134 extending from bottom 128 and circuit board 102; Figs. 1, 2, 5; as found in at least paragraphs [0017], [0024]–[0025]; Scott states mounting posts 134 may be soldered in plated openings of circuit board 102 in paragraph [0025]], and a depressed portion provided in an area extending from the back surface to the bottom surface and disposed in the bottom surface in the vicinity of the mount portion [at least open bottom 128 and receptacle 132 of rear shell 122; alternatively opening 220 in top wall 126 providing soldering access; Figs. 2, 5, and 6; as found in at least paragraphs [0023]–[0025], and [0043]]. Regarding claim 3, Duesterhoeft discloses the shield connector according to claim 1, wherein the mount portion [at least mounting posts 134; alternatively grounding fingers 196 if relying on board-ground engagement rather than soldered posts; Figs. 2 and 5; as found in at least paragraphs [0025] and [0037]] is disposed so as to be visually recognizable through the depressed portion [at least open bottom 128/receptacle 132 of rear shell 122; alternatively opening 220 in top wall 126 providing access to terminating end 152 such as for soldering; Figs. 5 and 6; as found in at least paragraphs [0023]–[0025], and [0043]], in rear view of the outer conductor [at least outer housing 110/rear shell 122; Figs. 2, 5, and 6; as found in at least paragraphs [0022]–[0025], and [0043]]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Duesterhoeft, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Ziegler, Jr. (US 3,668,608; hereinafter ‘Ziegler’). Regarding claim 2, Duesterhoeft teaches the shield connector according to claim 1, with at least one center contact [112] in header assembly [100; Figs. 2 and 4–6; as found in at least paragraphs [0020], [0028], [0040], and [0043]], and the outer conductor includes a back portion that includes the back surface [at least rear shell 122, including side walls 130 extending rearward from front wall 124; Figs. 2, 5, and 6; as found in at least paragraph [0023]] and has the depressed portion defined therein [as indicated above]. However, Duesterhoeft does not expressly disclose a plurality of the inner conductors are provided and a partition portion that is continuous to the back portion and the partition portion is disposed between the inner conductors adjacent to each other. Ziegler teaches similar shield connectors including a plurality of the inner conductors are provided and a partition portion that is continuous to the back portion and the partition portion is disposed between the inner conductors adjacent to each other [Zieglers’ figures show inner conductors in a variety of numbers]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date modify Duesterhoeft’s shield connector to include a plurality of the inner conductors are provided and a partition portion that is continuous to the back portion and the partition portion is disposed between the inner conductors adjacent to each other, as suggested by Ziegler. One would have been motivated to do so to accommodate varying connection needs in a singular housing to meet the specifications. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and are cited as teaching similar conductors sandwiched between dielectric material. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEAH S MACCHIAROLO whose telephone number is (571)272-2719. The examiner can normally be reached M-F approx 8:30am to 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah Riyami can be reached at (571) 270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEAH MACCHIAROLO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 29, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738700
BUSBAR CONNECTOR AND POWER TERMINAL WITH CABLES
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723741
EASY-TO-MOUNT/DISMOUNT RECESSED BORDERLESS SPOTLIGHT STRUCTURE
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716559
BALANCING SUPPORT STABILIZATION DEVICE FOR USE WITH FIXTURES
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12717174
PORTABLE LIGHT APPARATUS, CHARGING DEVICE FOR A PORTABLE LIGHT APPARATUS AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A PORTABLE LIGHT APPARATUS
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12663137
VEHICLE LIGHTS, IN PARTICULAR MOTOR VEHICLE HEADLIGHTS
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+31.6%)
2y 8m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month