Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/834,218

TRANSMISSION OF SYSTEM INFORMATION WITH PUNCTURING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 29, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2022052206
Examiner
CHOUDHURY, FAISAL
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
701 granted / 823 resolved
+27.2% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
850
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 823 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of group II identified as claims 49-57 without traverse in the reply filed on 8/14/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 49, 52 and 55 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Publication No US 2015/0230211 to You et al. (hereinafter You) in view of U.S. Publication No US 2024/0172151 to Xiao et al. (hereinafter Xiao) As to claim 49, You discloses an apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory storing instructions that cause the apparatus to: store a mapping table comprising mapping information on demodulation reference signal sequences to puncturing patterns, the mapping information mapping a first demodulation reference signal sequence to a first puncturing pattern indicating a first set of punctured physical resource blocks, and at least a second demodulation reference signal sequence to a second puncturing pattern indicating a second set of punctured physical resource blocks; receive a signal comprising a demodulation reference signal sequence and system information and detecting the demodulation reference signal sequence (You; [0211] discloses a UE perform demodulation using only a pre-known default DMRS location. In this case, the eNB may transmit additional DMRS REs by puncturing a DMRS sequence in order to transmit the default DMRS to the UE. In other words, sequence part(s) mapped to additional DMRS RE(s)) among DMRS sequence mapped to REs of the additional DMRS pattern may be punctured. The eNB may use REs of the punctured DMRS to transmit data. The eNB may configure whether to use the REs of the punctured DMRS to transmit data); You discloses mapping information on DNRS. You fails to disclose detect the system information on a set of physical resource blocks defining a first frequency band. However, Xiao discloses if the demodulation reference signal sequence is detected as the first demodulation reference signal sequence, detect the system information on a set of physical resource blocks defining a first frequency band that excludes the first set of punctured physical resource blocks (Xiao; [0030] discloses determining DMRS sequence mapping. In some examples in which some or all PBCH RB are punctured, the DMRS sequence is mapped to available DMRS REs in the SS/PBCH block, thus improving the integrity of the DMRS sequence mapping on the PBCH. [0041]-[0042] discloses the UE can receive the at least one first parameter from the network (e.g., the BS). The data of the DMRS sequence is mapped to the DMRS REs in PBCH RBs that are different from those indicated by the at least one first parameter based on a prerequisite of the original code rate. In some examples in which there are not enough DMRS REs for DMRS sequence mapping under the prerequisite of the original code rate, the code rate is increased until the entire DMRS sequence can be fully mapped to the DMRS RE. Accordingly, all DMRS sequence data can be transmitted even if the PBCH RB is punctured. In other words, if a part of the DMRS sequence has failed to be mapped to the DMRS REs based on a code rate, the code rate is increased until an entirety of the DMRS sequence is mapped to the DMRS REs. The DMRS sequence is first mapped to the DMRS REs of PBCH RBs that have bandwidths that are within the bandwidth of or corresponding to the PSS 350 and/or SSS 360. The mapping can be performed according to a suitable mechanism predefined by the specification. In some arrangements, a time domain symbol is mapped to a low frequency symbol first and then to a high frequency symbol. Next, the remaining DMRS sequence is mapped to DMRS REs that are outside of the bandwidth of or corresponding to the PSS 350 and/or SSS 360 according to the same mechanism); and if the demodulation reference signal sequence is detected as the second demodulation reference signal sequence, detect the system information on a set of physical resource blocks defining a second frequency band that excludes the second set of punctured physical resource blocks (Xiao; [0030] discloses determining DMRS sequence mapping. In some examples in which some or all PBCH RB are punctured, the DMRS sequence is mapped to available DMRS REs in the SS/PBCH block, thus improving the integrity of the DMRS sequence mapping on the PBCH. [0041]-[0042] discloses the UE can receive the at least one first parameter from the network (e.g., the BS). The data of the DMRS sequence is mapped to the DMRS REs in PBCH RBs that are different from those indicated by the at least one first parameter based on a prerequisite of the original code rate. In some examples in which there are not enough DMRS REs for DMRS sequence mapping under the prerequisite of the original code rate, the code rate is increased until the entire DMRS sequence can be fully mapped to the DMRS RE. Accordingly, all DMRS sequence data can be transmitted even if the PBCH RB is punctured. In other words, if a part of the DMRS sequence has failed to be mapped to the DMRS REs based on a code rate, the code rate is increased until an entirety of the DMRS sequence is mapped to the DMRS REs. The DMRS sequence is first mapped to the DMRS REs of PBCH RBs that have bandwidths that are within the bandwidth of or corresponding to the PSS 350 and/or SSS 360. The mapping can be performed according to a suitable mechanism predefined by the specification. In some arrangements, a time domain symbol is mapped to a low frequency symbol first and then to a high frequency symbol. Next, the remaining DMRS sequence is mapped to DMRS REs that are outside of the bandwidth of or corresponding to the PSS 350 and/or SSS 360 according to the same mechanism) It is obvious for a person of ordinary skilled in the art to combine the teachings before the effective filing date of the invention. One would be motivated to combine the teachings so that important data of DMRS sequences can be preferentially mapped first to the DMRS REs of PBCH RBs that have bandwidths that are within the bandwidth of or corresponding to the PSS 350 and/or SSS 360 to ensure that the important data is not punctured As to claim 52, the rejection of claim 49 as listed above is incorporated herein. In addition, You-Xiao discloses wherein the system information comprises a master information block indicating a control resource set for a physical downlink control channel, and wherein the means are configured to detect control information for further system information on physical resource blocks of the physical downlink control channel by using the same puncturing pattern as used for detecting the master information block (Xiao; [0040]-[0045]). As to claim 55, the rejection of claim 49 as listed above is incorporated herein. In addition, You-Xiao discloses wherein the mapping table maps each demodulation reference signal sequence of the mapping table to a unique combination of a puncturing pattern and at least one of a synchronization signal block index, a puncturing pattern, a half- frame index, and a channel bandwidth (Xiao; [0040]-[0045]) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 50-51, 53-54 and 56-57 are objected, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAISAL CHOUDHURY whose telephone number is (571)270-3001. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-6P.M. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino can be reached at 5712723905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAISAL CHOUDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771468
CONDITION MONITORING DEVICE, GROUND WIRELESS DEVICE, ON-BOARD WIRELESS DEVICE, FAILURE RISK DETERMINATION METHOD, CONTROL CIRCUIT, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764781
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RESOURCE CONFIGURATION
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764664
COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757046
CHANNEL STATE PARAMETER TRANSMISSION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750742
Group Handover with Delayed or Omitted Signalling for Layer 2 Sidelink Relaying
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 823 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month