Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/834,233

D-AMINO ACID OXIDASE AND USE THEREOF IN PREPARATION OF L-PHOSPHINOTHRICIN OR INTERMEDIATE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Jan 30, 2022 — CN 202210114692.7 +1 more
Examiner
KIEFER, DALTON EDWARD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shanghai Qizhou Ziyue Biotechnology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
5 granted / 6 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
23
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§112
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 6 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Application Claims 1, 3-13, 15 and 16 are pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The preliminary amendment filed on 07/30/2024 amending claims 6, 8, 9, 10 and 12, cancelling claim 14, adding claims 15 and 16 and amendment to the specification to update the filing information and addition of the statement of incorporation of a Sequence Listing XML file is acknowledged. The preliminary amendment filed on 07/03/2026 amending claims 3-5 and cancelling claim 2 is acknowledged. Applicants’ election without traverse of Group I, claims 1, 5-13, 15-16 all partially, drawn in part to a D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) variant derived from the polypeptide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1, comprising at least one amino acid substitution at position K29 selected from G, H, I, N, Q, W, Y, C, or L; nucleic acid; method for preparing the DAAO; PPO preparation method; L-glufosinate preparation method and a transformant in a communication filed on 07/03/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 3-4 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/03/2026. Claims 1, 5-13, & 15-16 are under consideration and are being examined herein. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d) to parent Application No. CN202210114692.7, filed on 01/30/2021. The instant application is a 371 national stage application of PCT/CN2023/073897 filled on 01/30/2023. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/13/2024 and 10/11/2025 are acknowledged. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected for the following typographical error, “oxidas”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(a) Written Description The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is directed to a D-amino acid oxidase, wherein the amino acid sequence of the D-amino acid oxidase has one amino acid residue difference selected from the following as compared to SEQ ID NO: 1: K29G/H/I/N/Q/W/Y/C/L and the D-amino acid oxidase has an activity and/or a thermal stability not lower than that of a D-amino acid oxidase of the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1. Claims 5-13, & 15-16 depend directly or indirectly from claim 1. While the specification appears to have support for the K29G/H/I/N/Q/W/Y/C/L mutations for SEQ ID NO: 1 that have increased thermal stability (see table 7), claim 1 reads, “has an activity and/or a thermal stability not lower than that of a D-amino acid oxidase as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1” and the only enzymes that it shows support for having activity not lower than SEQ ID NO: 1 (Enz. 1) are Enz. 27 (V42Y-C234L), and Enz. 32 (E195Y-C234L-V326W) (see Table 8). These mutants do not fall under the scope of claim 1, and therefore a person of ordinary skill in the art would not recognize from the specification that the Applicant was in possession of the full scope of the claimed invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-13, and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 8 (claim 9 depending therefrom), the phrase "such as" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 10 (claims 11 and 12 depending therefrom), the phrase "such as" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 11, the phrase "such as" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 15 (claim 16 depending therefrom), the phrase "such as" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 10 (claims 11 and 12 depending therefrom), the phrase "for example" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 8 (claim 9 depending therefrom), the phrase "preferably" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 10 (claims 11 and 12 depending therefrom), the phrases "preferably" and “more preferably” renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 11, the phrase "preferably" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 13, the phrase "preferably" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Regarding claim 15 (claim 16 depending therefrom), the phrase "preferably" renders the claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Correction is required. Claim 10 (claims 11 and 12 depending therefrom) is indefinite in the recitation of a broader range followed by a narrow range “1 : (0.5-3), for example, 1 : 1” and “1 : (20-60); for example, 1 : 40”. Correction is required. Claim 13 is indefinite in the recitation of a broader range followed by a narrow range “7-10, preferably 8.4-8.6” and “28-35°C, preferably 30-33°C”. Correction is required. Closest Prior Art The prior art does teach mutations to a D-amino acid oxidase (GenBank accession: POY70719, Malfatti et al. Front Microbiol 8, 2528 (2018)). However, the prior art does not teach an amino acid sequence of the D- amino acid oxidase has one amino acid residue difference compared to SEQ ID NO: 1: K29G/H/I/N/Q/W/Y/C/L. Based on the prior art, it would not be obvious to make such mutations and would require more than routine experimentation to discover an increase in thermal stability and/or increased activity over SEQ ID NO: 1. Conclusion No claim is in condition for allowance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DALTON KIEFER, PhD whose telephone number is (571)272-1235. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Mondesi can be reached at (408)918-7584. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DALTON EDWARD KIEFER/Examiner, Art Unit 1652 /ROBERT B MONDESI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+0.0%)
3y 0m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 6 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month