Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/834,540

3D PRINTING METHODS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Feb 08, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTUS2022015559
Examiner
TENTONI, LEO B
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Peridot Print LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1156 granted / 1411 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1430
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
50.3%
+10.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1411 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kasperchik et al (WO 2018/156207 A1). Regarding claim 15 (a product-by-process claim), Kasperchik et al (see paragraphs [0002] (three-dimensional printed parts) and [0191] (active material in the binder includes near-infrared absorbing dyes) teaches three-dimensional printed parts as claimed. Even though product-by-process claims are defined by and limited by the process, the determination of patentability of product-by-process claims is based on the product itself, not on its method of production (see MPEP §2112.01(I) and 2112.01(II)). The printed object of Kasperchik et al is made from the same build material as the printed object recited in claim 15. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6, 9-14 and 16 are allowable over the prior art references currently of record. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 6-11 of the reply, filed on 29 June 2026, with respect to claims 1-6 and 9-14 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1-6 and 9-14 has been withdrawn. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEO B. TENTONI whose telephone number is (571)272-1209. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-4:00 ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina A. Johnson can be reached at (571)272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEO B. TENTONI Primary Examiner Art Unit 1742 /LEO B TENTONI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703140
IMPRINT APPARATUS AND ARTICLE MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697766
IMPRINT APPARATUS, IMPRINT METHOD, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ARTICLE, DETERMINATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700619
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SOLID ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY, APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING SOLID ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE, AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697767
Apparatus and Methods for Manufacturing Products Containing Sequestered Carbon
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691628
MOLD, MOLDING MACHINE AND METHOD FOR MOLDING BY EXTRUSION BLOW MOLDING
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1411 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month