Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/834,880

INFORMATION INTERACTION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Examiner
KETEMA, BENYAM
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
395 granted / 606 resolved
+3.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
619
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
59.5%
+19.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 606 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment2. In an amendment dated, November 26, 2025, claims 1-16 and 18-21 are amended and claim 17 is/are previously canceled. Currently claims 1-16 and 18-21 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on November 26, 2025, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In the remarks filed on November 26, 2025, applicant argues prior art of record fails to disclose the claim limitation of independent claim wherein “…determining a message movement start point of the message based on the message sending operation; and moving the message in the virtual reality space based on the message movement start point.”. The office respectfully disagrees. Prior art Kim et al (620) discloses a head mounted display (HMD) capable of providing contents to a user wherein the controller 110 may display the notification (i.e. massage) information at a given position (i.e. start point) and said notification (i.e. massage) within virtual reality space moves to a new location when the user select displayed massage/notification. The user's selection may be of course determined by the user's gesture. Accordingly, when the user reaches out a hand to take a gesture of touching the graphic object 1030 in a letter envelope shape, the controller 110 may determine that there is the user's interaction to the notification information. Accordingly, the controller 110 may display the content of the notification information on the display unit 112 as illustrated above in FIG. 10B(b). And Prior art Kim et al (401) discloses glass-type mobile terminal 400 can be wearable on a head of a human body and mobile terminal 400 may be configured to include features that are the same or similar to that of mobile terminal 100 of FIGS. 1A-1C. The display unit 451 may be implemented as a head mounted display (HMD). The HMD refers to display techniques by which a display is mounted to a head to show an image directly in front of a user's eyes. In order to provide an image directly in front of the user's eyes when the user wears the glass-type mobile terminal 400. The mobile terminal 400 may provide an augmented reality (AR) by overlaying a virtual image on a realistic image or background using the display. The glass-type mobile terminal 400 may include user input units 423a and 423b, which can each be manipulated by the user to provide an input. Furthermore; prior art (Fig 15) discloses displaying a virtual content wherein the user moves content (521) into virtual space from starting point. In other words Kim et al discloses moving content from initial point to new location (i.e. chat window 1430) within virtual reality space. Thus the operation of moving content within virtual reality space based on the message movement start point is clearly shown. It is obvious to an ordinary skill person in the art that moving content (i.e. massage) within virtual reality space would obviously require having an initial location (i.e. start point) in order to be able to determine its movement. Therefore prior art of record discloses VR device that is capable of receiving user’s input wherein the user can select and move content within virtual space from initial location to desired location based on initial/start point as claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-4, 6- 9, 11, 16, 18 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al (PG Pub NO 2017/0192620) in view of Kim et al (PG Pub NO 2018/0173401). As in claim 1, Kim et al discloses an information interaction method, comprising: displaying a virtual reality space, the virtual reality space comprising a video image display space for displaying a video image; (Fig 4, 7 and Par 0055) discloses HMD 100 comprising a video image display space (display 112) for displaying a video image (Par 0059 virtual reality image displayed on the display unit 112) determining a message in response to a message sending operation; (Fig 2 - 8 and Par 0059) discloses controller 110 may display the notification (i.e. massage) information at a position (Fig 10 and Par 0149-0150) discloses determining a message movement from start point of message within virtual reality space to a new location when the user select displayed massage/notification. but fails to explicitly disclose determining a message movement start point of the message based on the message sending operation; and moving the message in the virtual reality space based on the message movement start point. However Kim et al (401) (Fig 14-15 and Par 0297-0305) discloses determining content (i.e. a message) movement from start point (521) of the message based on the message sending operation and moving content (i.e. message) in the virtual reality space based on initial location ( start point). In other words prior art Kim et al discloses moving content from initial point to new location (i.e. chat window 1430). Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinary skill person in the art at the time of the filing to modify the teaching of Kim et al (,620) VR device that is capable of receiving users input with the teaching of Kim et al (401) wherein the user can select and move content within virtual space from initial location to desired location based on initial/start point in order to allow better interaction of content within VR space. As in claim 2, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein when the message sending operation (Fig 14-15 chat) comprises an operation with respect to a preset message editing interface displayed in the virtual reality space [(Fig 14-15) discloses chat operation having preset message (i.e. sharing content) , the determining a message movement start point of the message (Kim et al (620) Fig 14-15) comprises: determining the message movement start point of the message based on a position of the message editing interface in the virtual reality space. (Kim et al (401); Fig 14-15 and Par 00297) discloses selecting content from start point of the message (i.e. furniture) and moving said content to new location (i.e. message editing interface) based on a position of the first location within virtual reality space. As in claim 3, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein when the message sending operation comprises an operation with respect to a virtual reality control device, the determining a message movement start point of the message comprises: determining the message movement start point of the message based on a position of a visual representation corresponding to the virtual reality control device in the virtual reality space. (Kim et al (401); Fig 14-15) As in claim 4, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 1, further comprising: determining a message movement end point of the message in response to the message sending operation, wherein the moving the message in the virtual reality space based on the message movement start point comprises: moving the message in the virtual reality space based on the message movement start point and the message movement end point. (Kim et al (401); Fig 14-15) discloses selecting content from start point of the message (i.e. furniture) and moving said content to new location (i.e. message editing interface) based on a position of the first location and final location As in claim 6, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 4, wherein the virtual reality space further comprises a message display space, and the message movement end point is located in the message display space. (Kim et al (401); Fig 14-15) discloses message display space, and the message movement end point is located in the message display space As in claim 7, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 6, wherein the message display space is located in front of the video image display space in a first direction, and the first direction is a direction in which the video image is oriented. (Kim et al (,620); Fig 7) discloses message display space is located in front of the video image display is a direction in which the video image is oriented. As in claim 8, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein an orthographic projection of the message display space on the video image display space is located outside a preset central region of the video image display space. (Kim et al (,620); Fig 7) discloses message display space on the video image display space is located outside a preset central region of the video image display space. As in claim 9, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the virtual reality space further comprises a text message display space and/or a function card display space; and the message display space does not overlap the text message display space and/or the function card display space. (Kim et al (401); Fig 14-15) discloses the message display space does not overlap the text message display space As in claim 11, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein a rendering level of the message is lower than a rendering level of a text message or a function card in the virtual reality space. (obvious) it would have been obvious to an ordinary skill person in the art at the time of the filing to have different rendering level of the message vs text message. As in claim 16, Kim et al in view of Kim et al discloses the method according to claim 1, further comprising: rendering a preset animation effect based on a movement path of the message. Obvious design choice As in claim 18, Kim et al discloses an electronic device, comprising: at least one memory (Fig 1 item 114) and at least one processor (Fig 1 item 110), wherein the memory is configured to store program codes, and the processor is configured to call the program codes stored in the memory, to cause the electronic device to execute an information interaction method, (Par 0053-0054) discloses the memory 114 stores data supporting various functions of the HMD device 100. The memory 114 may store a plurality of application programs (or applications) executed in the HMD device 100, data for the operation of the HMD device 100, instructions, and the like. and the information interaction method comprises: displaying a virtual reality space, the virtual reality space comprising a video image display space for displaying a video image; (Fig 4, 7 and Par 0055) discloses HMD 100 comprising a video image display space (display 112) for displaying a video image (Par 0059 virtual reality image displayed on the display unit 112) determining a message in response to a message sending operation; (Fig 2 - 8 and Par 0059) discloses controller 110 may display the notification (i.e. massage) information at a position (Fig 10 and Par 0149-0150) discloses determining a message movement from start point of the message within virtual reality space to a new location when the user select displayed massage/notification. but fails to explicitly disclose determining a message movement start point of the message based on the message sending operation; and moving the message in the virtual reality space based on the message movement start point. However Kim et al (401) (Fig 15 and Par 0303-0305) discloses determining content (i.e. a message) movement start point (512) of the message based on the message sending operation and moving content (i.e. message) in the virtual reality space based on initial location ( start point). In other words prior art Kim et al discloses moving content from initial point to new location. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinary skill person in the art at the time of the filing to modify the teaching of Kim et al (,620) VR device that is capable of receiving users input with the teaching of Kim et al (401) wherein the user can select and move content within virtual space from initial location to desired location based on initial/start point in order to allow better interaction of content within VR space. As in claim 19 , A non-transitory computer storage medium, wherein the non-transitory computer storage medium stores program codes, when the program codes are executed by a computer device, the computer device is caused to execute an information interaction method, and the information interaction method comprises: displaying a virtual reality space, the virtual reality space comprising a video image display space for displaying a video image; (Fig 4, 7 and Par 0055) discloses HMD 100 comprising a video image display space (display 112) for displaying a video image (Par 0059 virtual reality image displayed on the display unit 112) determining a message in response to a message sending operation; (Fig 2 - 8 and Par 0059) discloses controller 110 may display the notification (i.e. massage) information at a position (Fig 10 and Par 0149-0150) discloses determining a message movement from start point of the message within virtual reality space to a new location when the user select displayed massage/notification. but fails to explicitly disclose determining a message movement start point of the message based on the message sending operation; and moving the message in the virtual reality space based on the message movement start point. However Kim et al (401) (Fig 15 and Par 0303-0305) discloses determining content (i.e. a message) movement start point (512) of the message based on the message sending operation and moving content (i.e. message) in the virtual reality space based on initial location ( start point). In other words prior art Kim et al discloses moving content from initial point to new location. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinary skill person in the art at the time of the filing to modify the teaching of Kim et al (,620) VR device that is capable of receiving users input with the teaching of Kim et al (401) wherein the user can select and move content within virtual space from initial location to desired location based on initial/start point in order to allow better interaction of content within VR space. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 5, 10, 12-15, 20 and 21 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENYAM KETEMA whose telephone number is (571)270-7224. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM (M-F). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENYAM KETEMA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596020
ELECTRICAL END DEVICE, MANUFACTURING METHOD AND ADJUSTMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598708
DETACHABLE SENSOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN ELONGATE CONDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591320
TRACK PAD WITH FORCE SENSING AND HAPTIC FEATURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12572271
INFORMATION INPUT DEVICE, INFORMATION INPUT METHOD, INFORMATION INPUT CONTROL PROGRAM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12561016
ACCESSORY FOR A COMPUTER MOUSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 606 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month