Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/835,144

VOICE SIGNAL OUTPUT METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2024
Priority
Aug 11, 2022 — CN 202210960657.7 +1 more
Examiner
WOO, STELLA L
Art Unit
2693
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Honor Device Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
816 granted / 1025 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1039
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1025 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 13-14, 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song et al. (US 2023/0008818 A1, “Song”) in view of Uetabira (US 2022/0375448 A1), and further in view of Su et al. (US 2022/0159369 A1, “Su”). As to claims 1, 14, 23, Song discloses a voice signal output method, wherein the method is applied to an electronic device (first terminal device 101, Figs. 1, 2; para. 0118), the electronic device comprises a first sound production assembly and a second sound production assembly, the first sound production assembly is a sound production assembly of a screen and is disposed at a first location of the electronic device, the first location is located on the screen and corresponds to a location of an ear of a user when the user holds the electronic device for a call (receiver 1011 outputs a downlink audio signal, received from a second terminal device 102, to the ear 201 of the listener, para. 0119-0123), and the second sound production assembly is disposed at a second location different from the first location (speaker 1012 is disposed at the opposite end of the terminal device 101, para. 0119; Figs. 1, 2), and the method comprises: generating a first voice signal, wherein the first voice signal is an interfering signal generated based on a downlink voice signal (a masking sound is generated based on the downlink audio signal, para. 0012), wherein the generating the first voice signal comprises: generating a first power spectral density, wherein the first power spectral density is a power spectral density calculated based on the downlink voice signal (performing spectrum analysis on the downlink audio signal to obtain a spectrum response, para. 0015); generating a masking signal and a pink noise signal based on the first power spectral density (generating a masking sound signal based on the spectrum response, para. 0016; a pink noise signal may be generated and used as a masking signal, para. 0013, 0157); adjusting the masking signal and the pink noise signal to a same delay; and generating the first voice signal based on the masking signal and the pink noise signal that are adjusted to the same delay; generating a second voice signal, wherein the second voice signal is a voice signal that is obtained after delay processing is performed on the downlink voice signal and that has a same delay as the first voice signal (downlink audio signal is delayed based on the time length for generating the masking sound signal so that the masking sound signal and the downlink audio signal are played in alignment, para.0029-0031, 0066, 0090, 0169, 0179); and at a same output time, outputting the second voice signal by using the first sound production assembly, and outputting the first voice signal by using the second sound production assembly (downlink audio signal is output by the receiver while the masking sound signal is synchronously output by the speaker, para. 0030-0031, 0066, 0120, 0208). Song differs from claims 1, 14, 23 in that although it discloses generating a masking sound signal or a pink noise signal (para. 0013, 0157), it does not teach the above underlined limitations, i.e. generating both a masking signal and a pink noise signal. Uetabira teaches suppressing conversation leakage by a mobile phone user (para. 0008) by making use of a masking sound in addition to further superimposing noise such as pink noise on the masking sound (para. 0031, 0102). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Song with the above teaching of Uetabira in order to provide increased privacy for a mobile phone user. Song in view of Uetabira further differs from claims 1, 14, 23 in that it does not teach the first sound production assembly as being a sound production assembly of a screen. Su teaches the use of a mobile device having a piezoelectric ceramic element to vibrate to generate a sound wave according to a received audio signal (para. 0014), the sound making assembly being fastened to the frame of the display (Fig. 7, para. 0083). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Song in view of Uetabira with the above teaching of Su in order to facilitate a light and thin design, as taught by Su (para. 0004). As to claim 13, Song in view of Uetabira and Su teaches: wherein the electronic device further comprises a third sound production assembly, the third sound production assembly is disposed at a third location close to different from the first location and the second location, and the method further comprises: generating a third voice signal, wherein the third voice signal is a voice signal that is obtained after delay processing is performed on the downlink voice signal and that has the same delay as the first voice signal; and outputting the third voice signal by using the third sound production assembly at the same output time (Song: speaker 1012 includes two separate speakers at the opposite end of receiver 1011, Fig. 1; Su: three driving diaphragms, Fig. 7, para. 0083). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-12, 16-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. de la Guardia Gonzales (US 2014/0095153 A1) teach providing speech privacy with a masker. Ferencz et al. (US 2007/0083361 A1) teach providing speech privacy using masking sounds. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Stella L Woo whose telephone number is (571)272-7512. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ahmad Matar can be reached at 571-272-7488. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STELLA L. WOO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2693 /Stella L. Woo/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681970
SEMANTIC SEARCH AND SUMMARIZATION FOR ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665987
VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT GENERATION FOR COLLABORATIVE BUILDING ASSESSMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652370
VIRTUAL REALITY CONFERENCING SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647532
ONLINE MEETING SUMMARIZATION FOR VIDEOCONFERENCING
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12641193
GENERATING INTELLIGENT MEETING INSIGHTS FOR UPCOMING VIDEO CALLS
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 7m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1025 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month