Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/835,344

INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2024
Priority
Feb 21, 2022 — CN 202210155735.6 +1 more
Examiner
ACOLATSE, KODZOVI
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
799 granted / 952 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1013
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 952 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is responsive to Application 18/835,344 filed 08/01/2024 in which claims 1-7, 9-16, 18-20, 28 and 29 are presented for examination. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7, 12-16, 18 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 10, 11, 19, 28 and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Awadin et al (US 2023/0140213 A1) in view of Ying et al (US 2019/0053211 A1). Regarding claim 1, Awadin teaches an information processing method, comprising: performing, by a user equipment, repetitions of a target Transport Block (TB) in accordance with first Downlink Control Information (DCI); receiving, by the user equipment, second DCI; determining, by the user equipment, resources for remaining repetitions of the target TB in accordance with the second DCI (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239], UE performing first repetition based on old DCI and remaining repetition based on new DCI) and performing, by the user equipment, the remaining repetitions of the target TB through the resources for the remaining repetitions of the target TB (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239] performing remaining repetition based on new DCI). Awadin does not explicitly disclose the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective. Ying teaches the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective (Ying: Fig. 31 and 36D; [0055], [0090], [0234] PDCCH/DCI indication start of repetition of TB). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Awadin wherein the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective as disclosed by Ving to provide a system for performing uplink transmission without grant (Ying: Abstract). Regarding claim 10. Awadin teaches an information processing method, comprising: transmitting, by a network device, first Downlink Control Information (DCI) to a user equipment, to schedule repetitions of a target Transport Block (TB); determining, by the network device, second DCI, wherein the second DCI is used to indicate the user equipment to determine resources for remaining repetitions of the target TB in accordance with the second DCI (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239], UE performing first repetition based on old DCI and remaining repetition based on new DCI); transmitting, by the network device, the second DCI to the user equipment; and receiving or transmitting, by the network device, the target TB through the resources for the remaining repetitions determined in accordance with the second DCI (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239] performing remaining repetition based on new DCI). Awadin does not explicitly disclose the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective. Ying teaches the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective (Ying: Fig. 31 and 36D; [0055], [0090], [0234] PDCCH/DCI indication start of repetition of TB). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Awadin wherein the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective as disclosed by Ving to provide a system for performing uplink transmission without grant (Ying: Abstract). Regarding claim 19, Awadin teaches an information processing apparatus applied to a user equipment, comprising a memory, a transceiver and a processor, wherein the memory is configured to store therein a computer program, and the transceiver is configured to receive and transmit data under control of the processor, wherein the processor is configured to read the computer program in the memory to perform following operation: performing repetitions of a target Transport Block (TB) in accordance with first Downlink Control Information (DCI); receiving second DCI; determining resources for remaining repetitions of the target TB in accordance with the second DCI (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239], UE performing first repetition based on old DCI and remaining repetition based on new DCI); and performing the remaining repetitions of the target TB through the resources for the remaining repetitions of the target TB (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239] performing remaining repetition based on new DCI). Awadin does not explicitly disclose the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective. Ying teaches the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective (Ying: Fig. 31 and 36D; [0055], [0090], [0234] PDCCH/DCI indication start of repetition of TB). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Awadin wherein the second DC indicating a start time when the second DCI becomes effective as disclosed by Ving to provide a system for performing uplink transmission without grant (Ying: Abstract). Regarding claim 2, Awadin in view of Ying teaches wherein the determining, by the user equipment, the resources for the remaining repetitions of the target TB, in accordance with the second DCI and the start time when the second DCI becomes effective comprises: obtaining, by the user equipment, the start time when the second DCI becomes effective; and in a case that the start time when the second DCI becomes effective is located within a repetition process of the target TB, determining, by the user equipment, the resources for the remaining repetitions of the target TB in accordance with the second DCI (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239] performing remaining repetition based on new DCI). Regarding claim 9. Awadin in view of Ying teaches wherein the remaining repetitions of the target TB comprise all remaining repetitions corresponding to the remaining quantity of repetitions of the target TB (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239] performing remaining repetition based on new DCI), or the remaining repetitions of the target TB comprise repetitions corresponding to a part of the remaining quantity of repetitions of the target TB. Regarding claim 11, Awadin in view of Ying teaches wherein the determining, by the network device, the second DCI comprises: determining that the second DCI comprises the start time when the second DCI becomes effective, and the start time when the second DCI becomes effective is located within a repetition process of the target TB (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239] performing remaining repetition based on new DCI). Regarding claim 28, Awadin in view of Ying teaches an information processing apparatus applied to a network device, comprising a memory, a transceiver and a processor, wherein the memory is configured to store therein a computer program, and the transceiver is configured to receive and transmit data under control of the processor, wherein the processor is configured to read the computer program in the memory to implement the information processing method according to claim 10 (See rejection of claim 10). Regarding claim 29, Awadin in view of Ying teaches wherein the processor is configured to read the computer program in the memory to perform following operation: determining that the second DCI comprises the start time when the second DCI becomes effective, and the start time when the second DCI becomes effective is located within a repetition process of the target TB (Awadin: Fig. 9; [0239] performing remaining repetition based on new DCI). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KODZOVI ACOLATSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1999. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10 am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Avellino Joseph can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KODZOVI ACOLATSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764566
RADIO RESOURCE CONTROL WIDE AREA CONFIGURATION OF A WIRELESS DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764583
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATIONS BASED ON REMAINING SERVICE TIME IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757232
CONFIGURATION BASED ON TRAFFIC PRIORITY AND QUALITY-OF-SERVICE AWARENESS BETWEEN USER EQUIPMENT
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757081
Switching Delay Control in a Dual-Active Protocol Stack Handover
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757182
TECHNIQUES FOR RETROREFLECTION BEAMFORMING
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.6%)
2y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 952 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month