Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/835,498

VEHICLE TREATMENT SYSTEM WITH TACTILE COLLISION DETECTION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Examiner
SHAHINIAN, LEVON J
Art Unit
1711
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Washtec Holding GMBH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
697 granted / 817 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
832
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 817 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The communication dated 8/2/2024 has been entered and fully considered. Claims 1-14 were amended. Claims 1-14 are currently pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. KR 20200018102 A (henceforth referred to as Kim). Citations to Kim, however, will be made to the English machine translation NPL document. As for claim 1, Kim teaches a vehicle treatment system (Fig. 1: part 100), in which at least one treatment device (Fig. 1: part 120) and a vehicle to be treated are movable relative to each other in a movement direction within a treatment region, comprising a tactile collision detection device (Fig. 7: part 100a, 100b, 100c) having a collision body supported via at least one connection component (30) on the at least one treatment device and located in a starting position at an outer border of the treatment region of the at least one treatment device, and a sensor unit (Fig. 9: part 350) configured to detect a movement of the collision body relative to the at least one treatment device as a collision risk between the at least one treatment device and the vehicle, the collision body being supported on the at least one treatment device via the at least one connection component such that, in an event of a collision with the vehicle, the collision body is displaced in a direction opposite to and/or in a direction perpendicular to the movement direction of the at least one treatment device until the at least one treatment device stops completely after a collision risk has been detected by the sensor unit (paragraphs [0040]-[0044]; Figs. 7-9). As for claim 2, Kim further teaches that the sensor unit has at least one sensor which is configured to detect a movement of the collision body and/or of the at least one connection component relative to each other or relative to the at least one treatment device and/or a force transmitted between the collision body and the at least one treatment device (paragraphs [0040]-[0044]; Figs. 7-9). As for claim 3, Kim further teaches that the at least one sensor is provided at an interface between the at least one connection component and the at least one treatment device and/or at an interface between the at least one connection component and the collision body and/or is accommodated in the at least one connection component (paragraphs [0040]-[0044]; Figs. 7-9). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEVON J SHAHINIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1384. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Barr can be reached at (571)272-1414. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEVON J SHAHINIAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593953
DISHWASHER WITH DIRT DISCHARGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594569
MATERIAL REMOVAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR BATTERY ELECTRODE PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591181
Contamination Handling for Semiconductor Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589417
PRESSURE WASHER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588797
CUP WASHER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (-3.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 817 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month