Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/835,655

DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE AND DISTANCE MEASURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Priority
Feb 09, 2022 — JP 2022-018574 +1 more
Examiner
RIDER, JUSTIN W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
National University Corporation Shizuoka University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
220 granted / 262 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
283
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 262 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 09/11/2024 and 02/09/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 25, the [[or]] in “flight or each” should be “for”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5-6 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by K. Yasutomi, Y. Okura, K. Kagawa and S. Kawahito, "A Sub-100 μ m-Range-Resolution Time-of-Flight Range Image Sensor With Three-Tap Lock-In Pixels, Non-Overlapping Gate Clock, and Reference Plane Sampling," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 2291-2303, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2019.2916310. keywords: {Logic gates;Image resolution;Clocks;Photoconductivity;Modulation;Calibration;Electric potential;CMOS image sensor (CIS);delay-locked loop (DLL)-based skew calibration;high range resolution;lateral electric field modulator (LEFM);lock-in pixel;non-overlapping gate clock;photogenerated-charge partitioning;range imaging;reference plane sampling (RPS);skew calibration;time-of-flight (TOF)}, referred to as YASUTOMI hereinafter. Regarding Claim 1, YASUTOMI shows a distance measuring device (Abstract, Sections I & II disclose a TOF range imager / distance measuring system for 3-D scanning and distance measurement.) comprising: a light source configured to generate pulsed light (Abstract; Section II-A states a short-pulse laser with ~100 ps pulse width is used as the light source.); a light source control circuit configured to control a generation timing of the pulsed light (Section III-E; Section IV describes a prototype chip producing the laser-emission trigger and using a digital delay generator to precisely control trigger delay.); a plurality of pixels arranged two-dimensionally (Abstract; Section III-A; Section IV), each of the pixels having a photoelectric conversion region configured to convert light into a charge (Section III-B; Appendix discloses a pinned photodiode (PPD) / photodiode-based lock-in pixel that converts incident light into photocurrent and accumulated charge.), a plurality of charge readout regions provided close to the photoelectric conversion region and spaced apart from each other (Section II-B; Section III-B discloses three floating diffusion (FD) nodes (FD1–FD3) used to store/read out signal charge, separate from each other and associated with the photodetection structure.), and a plurality of control electrodes that are respectively provided to correspond to the photoelectric conversion region and the plurality of charge readout regions and configured to apply a plurality of control pulses for charge transfer between the photoelectric conversion region and the plurality of charge readout regions (Section II-B; Section III-B discloses gates G1–G3 and GD that modulate the potential and transfer/route photogenerated charges to respective FDs during time windows TW1–TW3.); a control signal generating circuit configured to generate the plurality of control pulses to be applied to the plurality of pixels (Section III-C; Section III-D discloses a pattern generator (PG) producing gating clocks G1(i)–G3(i) and GD(i).); a plurality of driver circuits configured to respectively apply the plurality of control pulses generated by the control signal generating circuit to the plurality of control electrodes of a plurality of pixel groups divided from the plurality of pixels (Section III-A; Section III-C; Fig. 5; Fig. 7 disclose column-parallel gating clock drivers that drive gate clocks in each column/pixel group. The pixels are effectively divided by columns and driven in parallel.); a reference signal generating circuit configured to generate a reference pulse based on the plurality of control pulses generated by the control signal generating circuit (Section III-C; Section III-E; Fig. 8; Fig. 10 discloses a reference column / reference clock G1REF and reference pixel array used to sample correlated jitter. A reference pulse is derived from the gating clock system.); a plurality of time difference information generating circuits provided to correspond to the plurality of driver circuits and configured to generate time difference information corresponding to a time difference between one of the plurality of control pulses applied by each of the plurality of driver circuits and the reference pulse (Abstract; Section III-E; Fig. 10; Eq. (5) disclose reference plane sampling (RPS) to cancel correlated jitter by comparing main-pixel TOF timing with reference-pixel timing. It uses reference pixels and averaging.); and a calculation processor configured to calculate time information corresponding to a light time of flight for each of the plurality of pixels based on a plurality of charge amounts that are amounts of charges accumulated in the plurality of charge readout regions of the plurality of pixels (Section II-C; Appendix; Eq. (1), (11), (12) explicitly calculates TOF/distance from the charge amounts N1, N2, N3 using the signal charge ratio X and the TOF equation.), wherein the calculation processor deletes a jitter component from the time information calculated for the pixel group by using a plurality of pieces of the time difference information generated by the plurality of time difference information generating circuits (Abstract; Section III-E; Eq. (5) RPS cancels correlated jitter using reference pixels. This is a functional and conceptual match to jitter deletion using reference-based time difference information.). Regarding claim 2, YASUTOMI shows the limitations as per Claim 1 above, wherein the calculation processor calculates an average value of the plurality of pieces of time difference information generated by the plurality of time difference information generating circuits (Section III-E; Eq. (5)), and deletes the jitter component from the time information by subtracting a difference between the time difference information generated by the time difference information generating circuit corresponding to the pixel group and the average value from the time information calculated for the pixel group (Eq. (5); Section III-E discloses subtracting the average reference TOF and adding the known reference TOF: ttof,calc(i,j)=ttof(i,j)-avg(tref)+tref,known. This is very close to the claimed correction logic.). Regarding claim 3, YASUTOMI shows the limitations as per Claim 1 above, wherein the time difference information generating circuit includes a pseudo pixel having the photoelectric conversion region, the plurality of charge readout regions, and the plurality of control electrodes (Section III-E; Fig. 10 uses a reference pixel array embedded in the same focal plane. While not expressly using the same language as that in the instant disclosure, the concept is functionally similar to a pseudo pixel/reference pixel and therefore, for purposes of examination will be treated as being anticipated.), supplies a charge in a pseudo manner according to a timing of the reference pulse to the photoelectric conversion region of the pseudo pixel, and calculates the time information as the time difference information based on a plurality of charge amounts that are amounts of charges accumulated in the plurality of charge readout regions of the pseudo pixel based on the plurality of control pulses applied by the corresponding driver circuit (Section III-E; Fig. 10 reference plane sampling causes the reference pixels to measure a known-distance reflection using the same trigger/timing chain. Again, while the art does not literally describe supplying a charge in a pseudo manner, the examiner is interpreting the operation as being functionally analogous to, and thus anticipatory of, the claimed limitation.). Regarding claim 5, YASUTOMI shows the limitations as per Claim 1 above, wherein the time difference information generating circuit includes a time measurement circuit that generates a time difference between one of the plurality of control pulses and the reference pulse as the time difference information (Section III-C; Fig. 7; Fig. 8 discloses a bang-bang phase detector (BPD) and delay-line/DLL calibration circuit comparing G1(i) with G1REF to measure phase difference. This is analogous to a time measurement circuit measuring a pulse difference.). Regarding Claim 6, YASUTOMI shows a distance measuring method comprising: controlling, by a light source control circuit, a light source to generate pulsed light (Abstract; Section II-A states a short-pulse laser with ~100 ps pulse width is used as the light source.); generating, by a control signal generating circuit, for a plurality of two-dimensionally arranged pixels, a plurality of control pulses to be applied to the plurality of pixels (Section III-C; Section III-D; Fig. 7 discloses a pattern generator generating gating clocks for the pixel array.), each of the pixels having a photoelectric conversion region configured to convert light into a charge (Section III-B; Appendix discloses a pinned photodiode (PPD) / photodiode-based lock-in pixel that converts incident light into photocurrent and accumulated charge.), a plurality of charge readout regions provided close to the photoelectric conversion region and spaced apart from each other (Section II-B; Section III-B discloses three floating diffusion (FD) nodes (FD1–FD3) used to store/read out signal charge, separate from each other and associated with the photodetection structure.), and a plurality of control electrodes that are respectively provided to correspond to the photoelectric conversion region and the plurality of charge readout regions and configured to apply the plurality of control pulses for charge transfer between the photoelectric conversion region and the plurality of charge readout regions (Section II-B; Section III-B discloses gates G1–G3 and GD that modulate the potential and transfer/route photogenerated charges to respective FDs during time windows TW1–TW3.); applying, by a plurality of driver circuits, the plurality of control pulses generated by the control signal generating circuit to the plurality of control electrodes of a plurality of pixel groups divided from the plurality of pixels (Section III-A; Section III-C describes column-parallel drivers driving the gate clocks in each column/pixel group.); generating, by a reference signal generating circuit, a reference pulse based on the plurality of control pulses generated by the control signal generating circuit (Section III-C; Section III-E; Fig. 8; Fig. 10 discloses a reference column / reference clock G1REF and reference pixel array used to sample correlated jitter. A reference pulse is derived from the gating clock system.); generating, by a plurality of time difference information generating circuits provided to correspond to the plurality of driver circuits, time difference information corresponding to a time difference between one of the plurality of control pulses applied by each of the plurality of driver circuits and the reference pulse (Abstract; Section III-E; Fig. 10; Eq. (5) disclose reference plane sampling (RPS) to cancel correlated jitter by comparing main-pixel TOF timing with reference-pixel timing. It uses reference pixels and averaging.); and calculating, by a calculation processor, time information corresponding to a light time of flight or each of the plurality of pixels based on a plurality of charge amounts that are amounts of charges accumulated in the plurality of charge readout regions of the plurality of pixels (Section II-C; Appendix; Eq. (1), (11), (12) explicitly calculates TOF/distance from the charge amounts N1, N2, N3 using the signal charge ratio X and the TOF equation.), wherein in calculating the time information, a jitter component is deleted from the time information calculated for the pixel group by using a plurality of pieces of the time difference information generated by the plurality of time difference information generating circuits (Abstract; Section III-E; Eq. (5) RPS cancels correlated jitter using reference pixels. This is a functional and conceptual match to jitter deletion using reference-based time difference information.). Allowable Subject Matter Claim4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see the Notice of References Cited, form PTO-892 for discovered references deemed relevant but not material to patentability. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN W. RIDER whose telephone number is (571)270-1068. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7.00 am - 4.30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jamie J Atala can be reached at (571) 272-7384. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JUSTIN W. RIDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 2486 /Justin W Rider/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2486
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707064
VIDEO ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS APPLYING A MERGE MODE WITH MOTION VECTOR DIFFERENCE TO COMBINED AN INTER/INTRA PREDICTION MODE OR A GEOMETRIC PARTITIONING MODE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695910
VIDEO ENCODING, DECODING METHOD AND DECODER
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695866
INTRA MODE CODING BASED ON TEMPLATE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695922
ENTROPY DECODING METHOD, AND DECODING APPARATUS USING SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688640
ANIMATED DECORATIVE ITEMS WITH SENSOR INPUTS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.3%)
3y 5m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 262 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month