Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/836,372

ADHESIVE LAMINATE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HOUSING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Priority
Feb 08, 2022 — JP 2022-018189 +1 more
Examiner
FISCHER, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tomoegawa Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
735 granted / 1662 resolved
-15.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
94 currently pending
Career history
1767
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
71.1%
+31.1% vs TC avg
§102
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1662 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of an adhesive laminate in the reply filed on July 2, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that it should be no undue burden on the Examiner to consider all the claims in the single application. This is not found persuasive because the requirement of unity of invention in this national stage application has not been fulfilled (lack of technical relationship among the inventions or groups involving one or more of the same or corresponding special technical feature). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15-17, 19, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ooshima (JP 06049422, of record) in view of Choi (US 9,426,878, of record). Ooshima is directed to an assembly comprising a nonwoven base layer and a pressure sensitive adhesive layer positioned on a first surface of said base layer, wherein a thickness of the pressure adhesive layer is between 50 and 100 microns and preferably between 50% and 80% of such a thickness (25-80 microns) is impregnated into said base layer. Ooshima further includes an exemplary assembly in which the base material as a whole has a thickness of 43 microns, a portion of said base layer that includes or is impregnated with adhesive is 35 microns, a portion of said base layer that is devoid of adhesive is 8 microns, and an adhesive thickness outside of the base layer is 15 microns (based on total adhesive thickness being 50 microns) (Paragraphs 37-39). In such an instance though, Ooshima is silent with respect to the glass transition temperature of said pressure sensitive adhesive layer. In any event, the claimed glass transition temperature values are consistent with those that are conventionally associated with pressure sensitive adhesive materials, as shown for example by Choi (Column 3, Lines 4+). One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use any number of glass transition temperatures for the pressure sensitive adhesive of Ooshima, including that required by the broad range of the claimed invention, absent a conclusive showing of unexpected results. Regarding claim 2, Ooshima teaches the use of rubber-based pressure sensitive adhesives (Paragraph 30). With respect to claims 9 and 10, the non-woven fabric of Ooshima can be formed with PET fibers and polyamide fibers (Paragraph 13). As to claims 12 and 13, given that between 50% and 80% of the base layer can be impregnated with adhesive, it is evident that the nonwoven fabric would have an area percentage that is fully encompassed by the claimed range between 5% and 50%. Regarding claims 15-17, 19, and 20, the nonwoven fabric of Ooshima has a basis weight between 5 and 50 g/m2 (Paragraph 10). Claim(s) 3, 8, 11, 14, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ooshima and Choi as detailed above and further in view of Cervellati (US 4,973,497, newly cited). As detailed above, Ooshima is directed to an assembly comprising a non-woven fabric and a pressure sensitive adhesive or PSA (e.g. rubber-based pressure sensitive adhesive). In such an instance, though, Ooshima is silent with respect to a viscosity of said rubber-based PSA. In any event, the claims define an extremely broad range of viscosities (particularly in light of the range being open ended) that are consistent with well-known and conventional rubber-based PSAs, as shown for example by Cervellati (Column 1, Lines 23-29). It is emphasized that a fair reading of Ooshima does not limit the viscosity of the rubber-based PSA and the claimed viscosities are consistent with those found in commercially available rubber-based PSAs. Additionally, it is noted that both Ooshima and Applicant are directed to assemblies including rubber-based pressure sensitive adhesives (suggesting that mechanical properties and characteristics would be similar). Additionally, Applicant has not provided a conclusive showing of unexpected results for an adhesive having a viscosity in accordance to the broad range (open ended) of the claimed invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN R FISCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin Fischer /JUSTIN R FISCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 September 1, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734847
TIRE HAVING CANTILEVERED SIDEWALL SHAPE AND FLEXIBLE SUPPORT RING STRUCTURE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12715248
HYBRID CORD AND TYRE WITH SUCH CORD
4y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715250
TIRE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12703203
TIRE
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691709
A SELF-SUPPORTING TYRE FOR AUTOMOTIVE WHEELS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+2.2%)
3y 4m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1662 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month