Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/836,421

FLAGS WITH MOVEABLE INDICATORS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Examiner
BANH, DAVID H
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
597 granted / 840 resolved
+3.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
872
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 840 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ikeda et al. (US PG Pub 2007/0228640). For claim 1: Ikeda teaches a device comprising: a flag 52D, 61; a transfer device 53 to transfer rotational motion of the flag to linear motion of a moveable indicator 52B, 52C; and a scanner device 54, 55 to capture an image of a current location of the moveable indicator 52B, 52C on a scanner surface (see paragraph 14, front of the scanning element 54, 55). For claim 2: Ikeda teaches the device of claim 1 wherein the current location of the moveable indicator corresponds to a quantity of print medium Sa interacting with the flag 61, 52D. For claim 3: Ikeda teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the flag 61, 52D includes a first side that is a convex shape (see Fig. 8, exterior surface of element 52D, 61) and a second side that is a concave shape (see Fig. 8, interior of elbow from 52D, 61) and wherein the first side (see Fig. 8, particularly bottom surface of 61) is arranged to interact with print media Sa to move the flag in a direction of the second side (see Fig. 8, Fig. 9 and Fig. 10, the element 61 shifting upward). For claim 4: Ikeda teaches the device of claim 3, wherein the first side 61 includes a raised point (see Fig. 8, raised at the joint near 52D) that is tapered to lower points toward the edges of the flag 61 in a plurality of directions from the raised point (see Fig. 8, the remainder of portion 61 is lower than the bowed point near 52D). For claim 5: Ikeda teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the flag 61, 52D Includes an increasing size from a tip of the flag (see Fig. 6, end portion of 61 is the thinnest) toward a connection point with the transfer device (see Fig. 6, the joint between 52D, 61 is thicker than the tip of 61 and the portion 52D is thicker yet). For claim 6: Ikeda et teaches the device of claim 5, wherein the increasing size includes an increasing distance between edges of the flag (see Fig. 6, the increasing distance between the first lower side and the second upper side) For claim 7. The device of claim 1, wherein the moveable indicator 52B, 52C is a scannable device arranged to move along the scanner surface of the scanner device 54, 55 in response to movement of the flag (see Fig. 6, see paragraph 14, the element moves along the scanning surface of the scanner device 54, 55 which is a sensor). For claim 8. Ikeda teaches a printing device (see Fig. 1), comprising: a media tray (see Fig. 1, see Fig. 6, which depicts a tray below element 21) to receive print media Sa; a media width adjustor positioned on a first edge of the media tray; a media flag 52D, 61 positioned on a second edge of the media tray, wherein the media flag 52D, 61 includes a first side (see Fig. 6, bottom side, which is an exterior of an elbow and thus convex) that is a convex shape to interact with print media Sa positioned within the media tray (see Fig. 6, bottom side of 61 contacting sheets Sa, more clearly seen in Figs. 8 and 9) and a second side (see Figs. 6 and 8, interior elbow) that is a concave shape (see Fig. 6, the interior elbow being concave in shape); and a scanner device 54, 55 to scan an image of a current location of a moveable indicator 52B, 52C that moves along a scanner surface (see Fig. 9, surface of sensors 54, 55) of the scanner device in response to movement of the media flag (see Figs. 8 and 9, movement of media flag due to the surface of the substrate Sa moving the element 52B, 52C) from interacting with print media Sa positioned within the media tray. For claim 9: Ikeda teaches the printing device of claim 8, wherein the first side of the media flag 61 is arranged to receive a force from print media Sa while the print media is moved from the first edge of the media tray to the second edge of the media tray (see Fig. 9, if the substrate is loaded, a media surface moves from the bottom of the tray towards the top of the tray). For claim 10: Ikeda teaches the printing device of claim 9, wherein the print media moves the media flag in a direction of the second side of the media flag (see Fig. 9, moving the surface 61 vertically). For claim 11: Ikeda teaches the he printing device of claim 8, wherein the media flag includes a first width at a first portion of the media flag (see Fig. 8, first width at portion 61) and a second width at a second portion of the media flag (see Fig.8, second width at portion 52D). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 12-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ikeda et al. (US PG Pub 2007/0228640) in view of Tao et al. (US PG Pub 2015/0029563). For claim 12: Ikeda teaches a system comprising: a media tray to receive print media see Fig. 1, see Fig. 6, which depicts a tray below element 21; a moveable indicator positioned on the scan surface; a media flag 52D, 61 within the media tray to move a moveable indicator 52B, 53C along the surface in response to a force received while interacting with print media Sa within the media tray (see Figs. 8 and 9), wherein the media flag includes a convex side to interact with the print media (see Fig. 8, lower and outer surface of element 52D, 61 being an exterior elbow and thus convex, contacting the media Sa); and a processor to: sensor to sense the moveable indicator and determine a quantity of print media within the media tray based on the location of the movable indicator (see paragraph 72). Ikeda does not teach a scanner device with a scan surface to capture images of objects on the scan surface, the movable indicator position on the scan surface and the processor to instruct the scanner device to scan an image location of the moveable indicator on the scan surface. However, Tao et al. teaches a scanner device (See paragraph 24, image scanner) with a scan surface 60 to capture images of objects on the scan surface and capturing the movable indicator position on the scan surface and the processor configured to instruct the scanner device to scan an image location of the moveable indicator on the scan surface (see paragraph 47, provision of a single scanning module to scan the object and the flag, the controller may position the scanning module to scan the flag). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Ikeda to provide the sensor device for scanning the flag as scanning module for a scanner component of a system as taught by Tao et al. for the purpose of utilizing the single element for both scanning and determining the flag position. For claim 13: The combination of Ikeda and Tao et al. teaches the system of claim 12 and Tao et al. teaches that rotational motion of the media flag is transferred to linear motion of the moveable indicator (see Fig. 5A, 5B, the flag motion transfers to vertical motion of the element 32). For claim 14: The combination of Ikeda and Tao et al. teaches the system of claim 12, and Tao et al .teaches that the location of the moveable indicator corresponds to a distance between a first location and a second location on the scan surface (see Figs. 5A, 5B and paragraph 47, the movement of the indicator 32 is captured by the scanner module 60 at its first and second locations). For claim 15: The combination Ikeda and Tao et al. teaches all of the limitations of claim 16 except that wherein the first location is a position of the moveable indicator while the media tray is empty and the second location is a position of the moveable indicator while the media tray is full of print media. However, this distinction from the prior art can be overcome through a rearrangement of the known parts In the instant case, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify the invention to set the first location at an empty state of the tray and the second location at the full state of the tray to convey information over the entire usage range of the tray. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID H BANH whose telephone number is (571)270-3851. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 12-8PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached at (571)272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID H BANH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602007
DEVELOPING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602000
IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM AND POST-PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING BOOKLET BY BONDING PLURALITY OF SHEETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596322
THICKNESS DETECTION DEVICE, SHEET PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591195
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585221
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD FOR IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 840 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month