Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/836,706

METHOD FOR SEAMLESSLY CHANGING A VALUE OF AN EXTENDED UNIQUE IDENTIFIER OF A NON-AP STATION ASSOCIATED WITH AN AP STATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Priority
Feb 11, 2022 — GB 2201842.8 +1 more
Examiner
TAYLOR, BARRY W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
716 granted / 952 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
975
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
90.1%
+50.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 952 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. 1. Claims 1-2, 7, 9-13, 17-18 and 23-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ding (2016/0316362) in view of Kneckt et al (2023/0089319). Regarding claims 1, 23 and 24. Ding teaches a station and a method for changing a value of an Extended Unique Identifier (figure 13, 0229 – UE comprises memory, processor, program etc. and figure 14, 0232 – AP comprises memory, processor, program etc.), EUI, of a non-access point, non-AP, station associated with an access point, AP, station, the non-AP station and the AP station both using a same mechanism for determining a new value of the EUI (figure 7, 0164-0167 wherein AP and UE use an encryption mechanism for generating a temporary MAC address (e.g, EUI)), the method comprising at one of the non-AP station and the AP station: obtaining an EUI change start time (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0164 – step 701 wireless device associates with an AP1, Step 702 the network side generates a first temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI), that is, a temporary address, for the UE); determining the new value of the EUI (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect); and from the obtained EUI change start time and value for transmitting data to or receiving data from the other of the non-AP station and the AP station (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect) and figure 1, at step 704 – UE uses address 0 (e.g, the EUI value) and at step 711 – UE uses the changed MAC Address 1 (e.g., new EUI) to transmit/receive data). Ding does not teach obtain a transition period duration. Kneckt teaches the AP can establish a joint algorithm with the STA (e.g., both using the same mechanism), and use the joint algorithm to determine the first and second address profiles, as well as transition times for the schedule (abstract, 0007 – start time seed, figure 3B, 0048 – AP1 can randomize MAC addresses and parameters that are used for the duration of operation, figure 4B, 0062-0068 – AP and STA negotiate Mac Addresses to use between time 460 and 480 (e.g., transition times)) which indicates a short duration time for which the changed MAC address is used wherein devices using the changed MAC address can be difficult to determine (0047, 0052). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify Ding to include transition times as taught by Kneckt in order to enable the AP and STA to temporarily change/randomize the MAC address for a short duration (transition period) which prevents MAC address tracking thereby increasing MAC address privacy. Regarding claim 2. Ding teaches wherein at least an item of information for obtaining the EUI change start time is received from or is transmitted to the other of the non-AP station and the AP station (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect) and figure 1, at step 704 – UE uses address 0 (e.g, the EUI value) and at step 711 – UE uses the changed MAC Address 1 (e.g., new EUI) to transmit/receive data). Kneckt teaches the AP can establish a joint algorithm with the STA (e.g., both using the same mechanism), and use the joint algorithm to determine the first and second address profiles, as well as transition times for the schedule (abstract, 0007 – start time seed, figure 3B, 0048 – AP1 can randomize MAC addresses and parameters that are used for the duration of operation, figure 4B, 0062-0068 – AP and STA negotiate Mac Addresses to use between time 460 and 480 (e.g., transition times)) which indicates a short duration time for which the changed MAC address is used wherein devices using the changed MAC address can be difficult to determine (0047, 0052). Regarding claim 7. Ding teaches wherein at least an item of information for obtaining the transition period duration is received from or is transmitted to the other of the non-AP station and the AP station (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect) and figure 1, at step 704 – UE uses address 0 (e.g, the EUI value) and at step 711 – UE uses the changed MAC Address 1 (e.g., new EUI) to transmit/receive data). Regarding claim 9. Ding teaches wherein the transition period duration is predetermined (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect) and figure 1, at step 704 – UE uses address 0 (e.g, the EUI value) and at step 711 – UE uses the changed MAC Address 1 (e.g., new EUI) to transmit/receive data). Kneckt teaches the AP can establish a joint algorithm with the STA (e.g., both using the same mechanism), and use the joint algorithm to determine the first and second address profiles, as well as transition times for the schedule (abstract, 0007 – start time seed, figure 3B, 0048 – AP1 can randomize MAC addresses and parameters that are used for the duration of operation, figure 4B, 0062-0068 – AP and STA negotiate Mac Addresses to use between time 460 and 480 (e.g., transition times)) which indicates a short duration time for which the changed MAC address is used wherein devices using the changed MAC address can be difficult to determine (0047, 0052). Regarding claim 10. Ding teaches wherein the obtained transition period duration is transmitted to the other of the non-AP station and the AP station (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect) and figure 1, at step 704 – UE uses address 0 (e.g, the EUI value) and at step 711 – UE uses the changed MAC Address 1 (e.g., new EUI) to transmit/receive data). Regarding claim 11. Ding teaches determining that a value of the EUI is to be changed (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect). Kneckt teaches the AP can establish a joint algorithm with the STA (e.g., both using the same mechanism), and use the joint algorithm to determine the first and second address profiles, as well as transition times for the schedule (abstract, 0007 – start time seed, figure 3B, 0048 – AP1 can randomize MAC addresses and parameters that are used for the duration of operation, figure 4B, 0062-0068 – AP and STA negotiate Mac Addresses to use between time 460 and 480 (e.g., transition times)) which indicates a short duration time for which the changed MAC address is used wherein devices using the changed MAC address can be difficult to determine (0047, 0052). Regarding claim 12. Ding teaches wherein the EUI of the non-AP station is a MAC address of the non-AP station (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect). Kneckt teaches the AP can establish a joint algorithm with the STA (e.g., both using the same mechanism), and use the joint algorithm to determine the first and second address profiles, as well as transition times for the schedule (abstract, 0007 – start time seed, figure 3B, 0048 – AP1 can randomize MAC addresses (e.g,. EUI) and parameters that are used for the duration of operation, figure 4B, 0062-0068 – AP and STA negotiate Mac Addresses to use between time 460 and 480 (e.g., transition times)) which indicates a short duration time for which the changed MAC address is used wherein devices using the changed MAC address can be difficult to determine (0047, 0052). Regarding claim 13. Ding teaches wherein a request for changing the value of the EUI is sent by the AP station and received by the non-AP station (0146 – temporary MAC address in conjunction with a time for starting using the next temporary MAC address, figure 7, 0175 – the AP1 sends an updated temporary MAC address (e.g., EUI) to the UE which is also encrypted and further includes a piece of time information, indicating a time that the temporary MAC address starts to come into effect) and figure 1, at step 704 – UE uses address 0 (e.g, the EUI value) and at step 711 – UE uses the changed MAC Address 1 (e.g., new EUI) to transmit/receive data). Kneckt teaches the AP can establish a joint algorithm with the STA (e.g., both using the same mechanism), and use the joint algorithm to determine the first and second address profiles, as well as transition times for the schedule (abstract, 0007 – start time seed, figure 3B, 0048 – AP1 can randomize MAC addresses (e.g,. EUI) and parameters that are used for the duration of operation, figure 4B, 0062-0068 – AP and STA negotiate Mac Addresses to use between time 460 and 480 (e.g., transition times)) which indicates a short duration time for which the changed MAC address is used wherein devices using the changed MAC address can be difficult to determine (0047, 0052). Regarding claim 17. Ding teaches wherein a request for changing the value of the EUI is sent by the non-AP station and received by the AP station (figure 6 at steps 603 and 604, 0146 – UE transmits the request for temporary MAC address the AP wherein the request further includes a remaining use time of a current address such as the temporary MAC address 0 or a time for starting using a next temporary MAC address 1). Regarding claim 18. Ding teaches wherein the item of information for obtaining the EUI change start time is included in the request for changing the value of the EUI figure 6 at steps 603 and 604, 0146 – UE transmits the request for temporary MAC address the AP wherein the request further includes a remaining use time of a current address such as the temporary MAC address 0 or a time for starting using a next temporary MAC address 1). Allowable Subject Matter 2. Claims 3-6, 8, 14-16, 19-21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 3. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. ---(2016/0302058) Mestanov et al teaches STA and AP changing MAC address (abstract) to be used at a later time (0046-0047, 0056) thereby preventing user location tracking (0008). 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BARRY W TAYLOR whose telephone number is (571)272-7509. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday: 7-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Anderson can be reached at 571-272-4177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BARRY W TAYLOR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677143
Subscription Identifier Concealment in a Communication Network
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666249
ORDERING AND CREATING A SUBSCRIPTION PROFILE FOR A SUBSCRIBER ENTITY
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659725
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HANDLING USER EQUIPMENT RADIO CAPABILITY IDENTIFICATION (URC-ID) ASSIGNMENT PROCEDURE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659921
NETWORK TRANSFERRING METHOD, TERMINAL, AND NETWORK-SIDE DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12634678
PUSHING ESIM FUNCTIONALITY TO USER DEVICES BY CELLULAR NETWORKS
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 952 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month