Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/836,960

Pilot-Control Electromagnetic Valve

Non-Final OA §102§DP
Filed
Aug 08, 2024
Examiner
VENKATESAN, UMASHANKAR
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hydac Fluidtechnik GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
619 granted / 778 resolved
+9.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
809
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 778 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is responsive to the claims filed 8/8/2024. Claims 11 – 30 are pending in this application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 8/8/2024 is acknowledged by the examiner. Double Patenting Examiner notes the co-pending application 18/843,585 claims a pilot operated proportional solenoid valve with a normally open configuration. Examiner maintains the claims of the co-pending application would not read on the claimed subject matter without extensive modification and double patenting rejection is not appropriate. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11 – 12, 17 – 19 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication to Smith et al. (2007/0044649). Regarding claim 11, Smith et al. disclose a valve, comprising a main piston (76, Fig. 3) for actuating a main volumetric flow and a pilot piston (118, Fig. 3) for actuating a pilot volumetric flow; wherein the main piston and pilot piston are guided so as to be longitudinally movable in a valve housing (68, Fig. 3); wherein the pilot piston can be actuated using a solenoid device (98, Fig. 3); wherein the position of the main piston (76, Fig. 3) can be adjusted using the pilot piston (118, Fig. 3) in that a fluid pressure acting on the main piston is signalled into a pilot chamber (126, Fig. 3) with the pilot piston via a fluid connection (131, 133 Fig. 3), which pilot piston, when an actuated solenoid device is in an actuating position, holds the main piston in its closed position preventing the main volumetric flow; and wherein when the solenoid device is actuated, the pilot piston moves into a position in which the fluid pressure, decoupled from the pressure supply via the main piston, in the pilot chamber decreases until the main piston reaches an open position which controls the main volumetric flow. Regarding claim 12, Smith et al. disclose the pilot piston can be actuated by a magnet force of the solenoid device (98, Fig. 3) against a spring force (78, 80 Fig. 3) of an energy accumulator, wherein the pilot piston is substantially pressure-balanced taking into account a frictional force [para. 27]. Regarding claim 17, Smith et al. disclose the main piston (76, Fig. 3) is held towards its closed position using a further energy accumulator (80, Fig. 3). Regarding claim 18, Smith et al. disclose the respective energy accumulator is formed of a compression spring and wherein the compression spring (80, Fig. 3) for the main piston (76, Fig. 3), with higher spring stiffness [para. 24] than the compression spring (78, Fig. 3) for the pilot piston (118, Fig. 3), encompasses – in the circumferential projection - the latter. Regarding claim 19, Smith et al. disclose the main piston, which is formed at least partially convex (128, Fig. 3) on its free end face and inherently disclose a radius for establishing a linear relationship between the stroke of the main piston and the opening surface it produces at one of the fluid ports in the valve housing. Regarding claim 21, Smith et al. disclose the valve is a proportional valve [para. 31]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13 – 16, 20, 22 – 30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Application Publication to Bruck et al. (2025/0207683) and US Patent Application Publication to Bill et al. (2010/0294962) both disclosing pilot operated valves. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to UMASHANKAR VENKATESAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5602. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:30 AM - 6:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner' s supervisors Craig Schneider can be reached at (571) 272-3607 or Ken Rinehart can be reached at (571) 272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /UMASHANKAR VENKATESAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601420
3/3 WAY SOLENOID VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601424
Valve and Pressurized Fluid Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590594
Pipeline Actuation System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588459
GATE VALVE APPARATUS AND SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584558
HYBRID BUTTERFLY-BALL FLOW CONTROL VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.7%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 778 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month