Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/837,031

INERTIA LATCH FOR A VEHICLE ARMREST

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 08, 2024
Examiner
KIM, SHIN H
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tesla Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
735 granted / 1149 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1184
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1149 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yukifumi Yamada et al. U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0113263 (Yamada). Regarding claim 1, Yamada discloses a vehicle seating assembly comprising: an armrest (Figure 3 Element 5) configured to rotate about an axis and between an up position and a down position (Figure 2 Element O1); a lock plate (Figure 5 Element 21); a spin plate configured to rotate with the armrest about the axis and having a channel (Element 30 [0062] channel shown Figure 4B); and a pawl (Element 41 Figure 4A and 4B) disposed relative to the channel so as to move between a disengaged position and an engaged position, the pawl being biased to move towards the disengaged position by a biasing force, the pawl being disengaged from the lock plate when the pawl is in the disengaged position so as to allow the armrest to move between the up position and the down position, and the pawl engaging with the lock plate when the pawl is in the engaged position so as to inhibit movement of the armrest towards at least the down position ([0061-0066]). Regarding claim 2, Yamada discloses the vehicle seating assembly wherein the pawl is configured to move from the disengaged position to the engaged position when a magnitude of a change in velocity of the spin plate causes inertia of the pawl to overcome the biasing force ([0061-0079], the biasing element 47 in operation with the movement of the pawl Element 41). Regarding claim 3, Yamada discloses the vehicle seating assembly wherein the armrest is further configured to rotate relative to a seatback of the vehicle seating assembly (Figure 2). Regarding claim 4, Yamada discloses the vehicle seating assembly wherein the lock plate is fixed relative to the seatback (Element 21 [0058]). Regarding claim 5, Yamada discloses the vehicle seating assembly wherein the spin plate is configured to rotate with the armrest and relative to the lock plate (Element 30 [0062]). Regarding claim 6, Yamada discloses the vehicle seating assembly wherein the change in velocity is a change in linear velocity ([0066-0069], force of the biasing spring requires change in velocity of the moving parts). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yukifumi Yamada et al. U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0113263 (Yamada) in view of Bruce D. Houghtaling et al. U.S. Patent 5,882,080 (Houghtaling). Regarding claim 20, Yamada discloses a vehicle seating assembly (Figure 2) comprising: an armrest (Element 5) configured to rotate about an axis (Element O1) and between an up position and a down position. Yamada does not directly disclose an inertia latch having a ratchet and being configured to move between a disengaged position and an engaged position to inhibit unintended movement of the armrest in the event of a collision. Houghtaling discloses a latch for two elements comprising an inertia latch having a ratchet and being configured to move between a disengaged position and an engaged position to inhibit unintended movement of the element in the event of a collision (Column 4 Line 8-51, Column 5 Line 65-Column 6 Line 7); . Therefore it would have been an obvious modification well known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Yamada as taught by Houghtaling to include Houghtaling’s inertia latch mechanism. Such a modification would provide a means to secure the rotational elements of a vehicle with a safety enhance in the event of a collision. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-15, 21-26, 30 and 31 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHIN H KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-7788. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHIN H KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600276
INDEPENDANT AIR CONDITIONING SEAT FOR VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597370
Flag Label
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594866
VEHICLE USER SUPPORT INCLUDING UPPER HOOD MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583373
VEHICLE HEADREST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579916
POPUP VIDEO DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1149 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month