Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/837,282

AIR CIRCUIT BREAKER HAVING ARC COVER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0027198 +1 more
Examiner
BOLTON, WILLIAM A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LS Electric Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
691 granted / 774 resolved
+29.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
786
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 774 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because: Claim 1, line 6, “an arc cover” should be -the arc cover-. Appropriate correction is required. Abstract Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 7-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Rival et al, US 10020144 [Rival]. Regarding claim 1, Rival discloses (figs.1 and 3-6) an air circuit breaker (100) having an arc cover (136), comprising: an operation unit (14) in which arc is generated by operating a movable contact (12) with respect to a stationary contact (10); an arc extinguishing unit (24) installed on an upper side of the operation unit (14) and configured to primarily extinguish the arc; and an arc cover (136) which is installed on an upper side of the arc extinguishing unit (24), has a chamber (110) formed such that a high-temperature gas passing through the arc extinguishing unit (24) stays therein, and has at least one guide panel partitioning an interior of the chamber (110) into a plurality of parts [see fig.6] and having an opening (20) on one side thereof, and in which the high-temperature gas is discharged to an outlet (132) in a first direction along a passage guided by the guide panel. Regarding claim 2, Rival further discloses where, the arc cover (136) is formed such that a cross-sectional area of an inlet (at 20) through which the high-temperature gas is introduced is greater than a cross-sectional area of the outlet (132). Regarding claim 3, Rival further discloses where the guide panel of the arc cover (136) is installed horizontally with respect to a horizontal plane [see fig.6]. Regarding claim 4, Rival further discloses where an inner rib [see fig.6] is vertically formed in an inner side surface of the arc cover (136) and the guide panel. Regarding claim 7, Rival further discloses where outer rib [see fig.6] is vertically formed on an outer side surface of the arc cover (136), and the outer rib and the inner rib are formed at positions corresponding to each other. Regarding claim 8, Rival further discloses where guide panel is formed as a plurality of guide panels [see interior of 110]. Regarding claim 9, Rival further discloses where the outlet (132) in the first direction is formed on both side surfaces of the air circuit breaker (100). Regarding claim 10, Rival further discloses where a sealing member (38) is installed between the arc extinguishing unit (24) and the arc cover (136) to prevent the high-temperature gas from leaking. Regarding claim 11, Rival further discloses where a shield panel (22), in which a plurality of through-holes (20) is formed, is installed between the arc extinguishing unit (24) and the arc cover (136) to control a flow rate of the gas. Regarding claim 12, Rival further discloses where the shield panel (22) is coupled to or integrally formed with a lower end of the arc cover (136). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-6 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 5, the prior art fails to teach or show, alone or in combination, the claimed air circuit breaker, where the inner rib is formed in an arch shape. Regarding claim 6, the prior art fails to teach or show, alone or in combination, the claimed air circuit breaker, air circuit breaker where the inner rib is formed as a plurality of inner ribs, and each inner rib protrudes at a different height. Regarding claim 13, the prior art fails to teach or show, alone or in combination, the claimed air circuit breaker, where a closed part of the shield panel in which the through-holes are not formed is positioned below an opening formed by the guide panel. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Rivals, Boily, Das et al, Raabe et al, Hodges et al, Shea et al, Yee et al, Davis et al and Pochopien et al are examples of exhaust or vent assemblies configured similar to the present invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM A BOLTON whose telephone number is (571)270-5887. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 7:30AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee S Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM A BOLTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749637
OVERMOLDED ELECTRICAL DEVICE WITH LOW ELECTRICAL STRESS PARTING LINES
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749638
SF6 FREE GAS INSULATED DISCONNECTOR WITH LIMITED ARCING VOLUME
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744172
VACUUM SWITCHING UNIT AND VACUUM CIRCUIT BREAKER
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744167
ARC ELIMINATION DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744366
TANK-TYPE CIRCUIT BREAKER
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.7%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 774 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month