Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/837,403

ROLLER ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Priority
Feb 10, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2022053228
Examiner
WILSON, LEE D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Vestel Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1482 granted / 1853 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1872
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1853 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1- is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Weis et al 2016/0089932 A1. Weis et al disclose the claimed invention as recited in the claims as shown below: 1. (Original) A roller arrangement for a machine for applying a force to a display screen during assembly of the display screen to a frame, the roller arrangement comprising: a first plate 6 arranged to enable the roller arrangement to be connected to a robot assembly for manipulating the roller arrangement in use; a second plate 32; at least one roller 13 which is supported by the second plate, the roller being arranged to rotate in use about a roller axis and to apply a force to a display screen during assembly of the display screen to a frame; and at least one resilient member 5 arranged between the first plate and the second plate to connect the first plate and the second plate to each other such that the first plate and the second plate are spaced from each other, whereby the resilient member can absorb a shock or excessive force applied to at least one of the first plate and the second plate. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-7 are allowed. Claims 2-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The method claims are neither anticipated nor rendered obvious by the prior art does not disclose a roller arrangement, plates, at least one resilient member, and robot assembly being claimed in combination with the other limitations. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The 892 form discloses prior art being made of record. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEE D WILSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4499. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6;30-4;30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN KELLER can be reached at 571-272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEE D. WILSON Examiner Art Unit 3723 Ldw /LEE D WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723 June 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678901
Workpiece Holding Device and Workpiece Conveyance Device
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681350
FRICTIONAL ALIGNMENT DEVICE FOR CURVED SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674525
SYSTEM TO ALIGN AND INSTALL LARGE PIPE FITTINGS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677638
VACUUM PROCESSING APPARATUS AND TILT ADJUSTMENT METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667924
ASSEMBLY TABLE DROP-DOWN PLATFORM
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1853 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month