Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/837,425

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SATELLITE ACCESS NETWORK MEASUREMENT OUTSIDE GAPS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2022 — provisional 63/316,006 +1 more
Examiner
HARPER, KEVIN C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
852 granted / 970 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
997
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
71.2%
+31.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 970 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 11-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 2024/0172024) in view of Zhang et al. (US 2024/0260052 as supported by the corresponding passages of US provisional application No. 63/270,420). For dependent claims herein, the motivation to combine is the same as the parent claim unless otherwise noted. Regarding claim 1, Zhang ‘024 discloses a method, comprising: determining, by a processor of an apparatus (figs. 1, item 1200; fig. 7), whether a measurement gap (fig. 3A, item MG) is needed for performing a non-terrestrial network (NTN) (paras. 30-32; note: network device (base station) as a satellite) inter-frequency measurement (para. 114); determining, by the processor, whether a data interruption (fig. 3A, VIL for NCSG; para. 76; note: short data interruption time) is needed for performing the NTN inter-frequency measurement in an event that the measurement gap is not needed (paras. 114 and 122; note: the MG and NCSG are unneeded and the measurement is performed outside both gaps; paras. 200-202 and Table 8, “measurement conducted outside gaps” when the SMTC is fully non-overlapping with the MG and NCSG); and reporting, by the processor, a user equipment (UE) capability However, Zhang ‘024 fails to disclose reporting, by the processor, a user equipment (UE) capability to a network node according to a determination result. Zhang ‘052 discloses this feature (paras. 60 and 64-65; note: determined conditions affecting a capability and reporting the capability). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to reporting, by the processor, a user equipment (UE) capability to a network node according to a determination result in the invention of Zhang ‘024. The motivation to have the modification and/or well-known benefits of the modification include, but are not limited to, providing an appropriate supported operation parameter based on operational conditions as is known in the art (Zhang ‘052, paras. 60 and 64-65; MPEP 2143(I)(A)(B)(C)(D) - note: e.g., applying known techniques having predictable results). Regarding claim 2, Zhang ‘024 in view of Zhang ‘052 teaches and makes obvious the method of Claim 1, wherein the UE capability is reported Regarding claim 3, Zhang ‘024 in view of Zhang ‘052 teaches and makes obvious the method of Claim 1, further comprising: performing, by the processor, the NTN inter-frequency measurement outside the measurement gap in an event that the measurement gap is not needed (Zhang ‘024, paras. 114, 122 and 200-202; Table 8). Regarding claims 11-13, these limitations are rejected on the same ground as claims 1-3, respectively. In addition, Zhang ‘024 discloses an apparatus, comprising: a transceiver (fig. 7) which, during operation, wirelessly communicates with at least one network node of a wireless network (fig. 1; paras. 3-4); and a processor communicatively coupled to the transceiver (fig. 7) such that, during operation, the processor performs operations (para. 246) of the method of claims 1-3. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-10 and 14-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and citations not relied upon are considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zhang ‘024 discloses a DRX cycle related to measurements (para. 51, Table 3; para. 60, Table 4) similar to fig. 5 of the instant application. Zhang ‘052 discloses an undetermined drift of a target cell (fig. 3). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Harper whose telephone number is 571-272-3166. The examiner can normally be reached weekdays from 11:00 AM to 7:00 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Yemane Mesfin, can be reached at 571-272-3927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. For non-official communications, the examiner’s e-mail address is kevin.harper@uspto.gov (MPEP 502.03 – A copy of all received emails relating to an application including proposed amendments and excluding scheduling information for interviews will be placed informally into the application file). Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin C. Harper/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683745
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LINKING PDCCH CANDIDATES
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683749
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677202
TROPOSPHERIC DUCTING INTERFERENCE MITIGATION THROUGH UE MODE SWITCHING
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677169
SWITCHING BETWEEN NEW RADIO DUAL CONNECTIVITY AND CARRIER AGGREGATION IN CELLULAR NETWORKS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12659961
EARLY FEEDBACK FOR A MULTIPLE PHYSICAL DOWNLINK SHARED CHANNEL GRANT
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 970 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month