Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/837,543

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING CONFIGURATION AND VIOLATION OF POLICY OF TERMINAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Examiner
DOAN, DUYEN MY
Art Unit
2459
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
545 granted / 670 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
695
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 670 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6/30/2025 and 8/9/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dao et al (us 2020/0196169) (hereinafter Dao) in view of Kim et al (us 2023/0300651) (hereinafter Kim). As regarding claim 16, Dao discloses receiving, from a policy control function (PCF) entity, first information requesting analytics for user equipment (UE) traffic (see Dao 0071 PCF sends request to NWDA (i.e. NWDA receives) regarding mobility management parameter relate to UE); transmitting, to a network entity, a message requesting data for the analytics (see Dao 0009, NWDA request measurement data from a plurality of entities such as smf amf, udm ue…(Dao 0048-0049)); receiving, from the network entities second information associated with the UE based on the message (see Dao 0072, measurement data received from network entities and analyze by NWDA). Dao is silent to the concept generating the analytics for the UE traffic based on the second information and transmitting, to the PCF entity, the generated analytics. Kim teaches the concept generating the analytics for the UE traffic based on the second information and transmitting, to the PCF entity, the generated analytics (see Kim 0273, 0275, NWDAF derive analytics using collected data, and provide the generated analytic data to requesting PCF (see Kim 0205-0206)). It would have been obvious to one with an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Kim to Dao because they're analogous art. A person would have been motivated to modify Dao with Kim’s teaching for the purpose of enable proactively update policy based on the analytic data (see Kim 0222). As regarding claim 17, Dao-Kim discloses the first information includes a UE identity (ID) (see Dao 0107, UE IDs), an analytics ID (see Kim 0268 analytic ID), and an application ID (see Dao 0054,0074, application ID), wherein the second information includes the UEID (see Dao 0107, UE IDs), a single network slice selection assistance information (S-NSSAI), and a data network name (DNN) (see Dao 0106-0107, S-NSSAI and DNN). The same motivation was utilized in claim 16 applied equally well to claim 17. As regarding claim 18, Dao-Kim discloses the analytics includes third information on the UE traffic, wherein the third information includes at least one of information on a UE selection policy (URSP) or information on traffic descriptor (see Dao 0131, UE route selection policy (URSP information can be requested and provide). As regarding claim 19, Dao-Kim discloses the network entity includes at least one of a session management function (SMF) entity or a user plane function (UPF) entity (see Dao 0009, NWDA request measurement data from a plurality of entities such as smf amf, udm ue…(Dao 0048-0049)). As regarding claim 20, Dao-Kim discloses transmitting, to a network data analytics function (NWDAF) entity, first information requesting analytics for user equipment (UE) traffic (see Dao 0071 PCF sends request to NWDA regarding mobility management parameter relate to UE); receiving, from the NWDAF entity, the analytics for the UE traffic, wherein the analytics for the UE traffic is based on second information collected for the analytics (see Kim 0273, 0275, NWDAF derive analytics using collected data, and provide the generated analytic data to requesting PCF (see Kim 0205-0206)). The same motivation was utilized in claim 16 applied equally well to claim 20. As regarding claim 21, Dao-Kim discloses the first information includes a UE identity (ID) (see Dao 0107, UE IDs), an analytics ID (see Kim 0268 analytic ID), and an application ID (see Dao 0054,0074, application ID), wherein the second information includes the UEID (see Dao 0107, UE IDs), a single network slice selection assistance information (S-NSSAI), and a data network name (DNN) (see Dao 0106-0107, S-NSSAI and DNN). The same motivation was utilized in claim 16 applied equally well to claim 21. As regarding claim 22, Dao-Kim discloses the analytics includes third information on the UE traffic, wherein the third information includes at least one of information on a UE selection policy (URSP) or information on traffic descriptor (see Dao 0131, UE route selection policy (URSP information can be requested and provide). As regarding claim 23, Dao-Kim discloses generating fourth information applying for the UE traffic based on the analytics and transmitting the fourth information is associated with at least one of an updated URSP or an updated traffic descriptor (see Kim 0222, update the policy for WLAN which further explain in 0266 of Kim is the WLAN usage experience of the UE). The same motivation was utilized in claim 16 applied equally well to claim 23. As regarding claims 24-30, the limitations of claims 24-30 are similar to limitations of rejected claims 16-23 above, therefore rejected for the same rationale. Dao-Kim further discloses a transceiver and a controller (see Kim figure.4, transceiver 106 and processor 102). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUYEN MY DOAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4226. The examiner can normally be reached (571)272-4226. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tonia Dollinger can be reached at (571)272-4170. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUYEN M DOAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2459
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 19, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 11, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603860
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING SYNCHRONIZATION SOURCE COLLISIONS IN MISSION CRITICAL SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581282
VIRTUAL NETWORK (VN) GROUP AUTOMATION FOR DYNAMIC SHARED DATA IN 5G CORE NETWORK (5GC)
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12561717
Monitoring and Using Telemetry Data
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556485
FINE-GRAINED AND COARSE-GRAINED CONGESTION WINDOW SYNCHRONIZATION FOR TCP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12537707
SORTING METHOD FOR SORTING A PARTICIPANT LIST COMPRISING PARTICIPANTS OF A VIDEO CONFERENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 670 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month