Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/837,897

EARLY INDICATION FOR CHANGING CRYPTOGRAPHIC STRENGHT DURING CONFIGURATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Feb 14, 2022 — EU 22156570.8 +1 more
Examiner
ZAIDI, SYED A
Art Unit
2432
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
636 granted / 778 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
818
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 778 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
CTNF 18/837,897 CTNF 87365 Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. DETAILED ACTION This is a reply to the application filed on 8/13/2024, in which, claims 1-5, 7-12, and 14-31 are pending. In Response to a Restriction/Election requirement (mailed 11/3/25), Applicant has elected without traverse Group II (claims 2, 11, 17, 22-24, and 29-31). Group I (claims 1, 3-5, 7-10, 12, 14-16, 18-21, and 25-28) is withdrawn from further consideration. When making claim amendments, the applicant is encouraged to consider the references in their entireties, including those portions that have not been cited by the examiner and their equivalents as they may most broadly and appropriately apply to any particular anticipated claim amendments. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings filed on 8/13/2024 are accepted. Specification 07-29-04 The disclosure filed on 8/13/2024 is considered. The disclosure is objected to because it contains an embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code. Applicant is required to delete the embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code; references to websites should be limited to the top-level domain name without any prefix such as http:// or other browser-executable code. See MPEP § 608.01. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim recites “wherein the processor circuit is arranged to select if the first type is different from the second type.” It is not clear what is selected as recited in the claim rendering the claim scope unclear. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-36 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. 07-36-01 AIA Claim 22 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 22 does not further limit any limitations of claim 2 from which it depends . Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter 12-151-07 AIA 07-97 12-51-07 Claim s 2, 11, 23, 24, and 29-31 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Independent claim 2 limitation: “completing a configuration protocol so as to connect to the network using a key corresponding to any type in the selection, wherein the selecting and the signing occur prior to the attempting to connect to the network has occurred for the first time since the providing” in combination with other limitations not taught by prior art taken alone or in combination. 13-03 AIA The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Independent claim 11 limitation: “wherein the decryption of the data object occurs prior to attempting to connect to the network has occurred for the first time after the providing” in combination with other limitations not taught by prior art taken alone or in combination Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYED A ZAIDI whose telephone number is (571)270-5995. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday: 5:30AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Nickerson can be reached at (469) 295-9235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SYED A ZAIDI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2432 Application/Control Number: 18/837,897 Page 2 Art Unit: 2432
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683765
CERTIFICATE-BASED PAIRING OF KEY FOB DEVICE AND CONTROL UNIT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682110
IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS, IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676855
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTHENTICATING A USER ON AN IDENTITY-AS-A-SERVICE SERVER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671684
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROACTIVELY UPGRADING LOW QUALITY ACCESS CREDENTIALS
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671711
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF DATA SECURITY MEASURES AND DATA INTEGRITY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 778 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month