Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/838,104

SINGLE BARRIER FOLDER SUTURE PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Feb 14, 2022 — IN 202211007688 +1 more
Examiner
PERREAULT, ANDREW D
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ethicon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
469 granted / 1007 resolved
-23.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1057
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
77.8%
+37.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1007 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species A, figure 1, claims 1-13 in the reply filed on 05/21/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 14-27 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species/invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 05/21/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Smith (US 4700833 A). Smith discloses: 1. A single barrier folder (figs 1-14, including figs 7-8) for holding a suture and a needle (capable of performing the above intended use) comprising: a plurality of openings configured to allow placement of a suture and form a suture winding (adjacent 20 capable of performing the above intended use); a first flap comprising a needle parking mechanism (adjacent 36 with 44, 48, 50), wherein the needle parking mechanism comprises a first portion (44), a notch (48), and a cutout (50), wherein the cutout and the notch are configured to hold the needle (capable of performing the above intended use), wherein the first portion is foldable and configured to fold in locking engagement with the notch (capable of performing the above intended use); a second flap and a third flap on opposite sides of the plurality of openings (adjacent 54, 22); a slit configured to receive an end portion of a fourth flap to lock the single barrier folder (adjacent 52 with flap adjacent 62/66). 2. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the plurality of openings allows external rods to be inserted through the plurality of openings for forming the suture winding (capable of performing the above intended use) . 3. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the plurality of openings are provided in a central zone of the single barrier folder (as in fig 1). 4. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 3, wherein the notch is present on a foldable perforated edge between the first flap and the central zone (the prior art already discloses the same concept as with 63 and 39). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the location of the above in the same manner because it has been held that that rearranging parts of an invention on the basis of its suitability for the intended use was an obvious extension of the prior teachings. Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). 5. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first flap, second flap, and the third flap have rounded corners. It is well within the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the above, for example to prevent injury to the users fingers. Further, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the shape because it has been held that a change in form or shape on the basis of its suitability for the intended use was an obvious extension of the prior teachings. In re Dailey et al., 149 USPQ 47. 6. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the surface area of the third flap is larger than surface area of the second flap (fig 7). 7. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the cutout is trapezoidal in shape and the notch is V-shaped. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the shape because it has been held that a change in form or shape on the basis of its suitability for the intended use was an obvious extension of the prior teachings. In re Dailey et al., 149 USPQ 47. 8. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 3, wherein the slit is provided along with the plurality of openings in the central zone, wherein the slit is curved (adjacent 39 and 63). 9. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 8, wherein the fourth flap comprises a protrusion which allows the end portion of the fourth flap to lock into the slit (adjacent 39 and 63). 10. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 9, wherein the slit is provided on a back face of the central zone (as in fig 1), wherein the fourth flap is folded covering the suture and the needle to lock into the slit (capable of performing the above intended use). 11. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the fourth flap further comprises linear perforations to tear off a portion of fourth flap. Official Notice is taken, that it is old and conventional to provide the fourth flap further comprises linear perforations to tear off a portion of fourth flap.. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made in view of the Official Notice to provide that the fourth flap further comprises linear perforations to tear off a portion of fourth flap in order to ensure that portions of the device can be used independently of the other and/or enhanced access can be provided. 12. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the notch and cutout are configured to hold the needle which is curved (capable of performing the above intended use). 13. The single barrier folder as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first flap and fourth flap are provided on opposite sides of the plurality of openings, wherein the first flap and fourth flap are perpendicularly located with respect to the second flap and the third flap (figs 7, 8). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW D PERREAULT whose telephone number is (571)270-5427. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571)272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW D PERREAULT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673809
Carrier For Containers
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668415
COMPOSTABLE WALL BULK SHIPPER
6y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12648840
Prosthetic Heart Valve Packaging and Attachment Assembly
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12637274
HIDDEN STORAGE BOX
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629812
TOOL SET WITH INTERSPERSED DUAL STANDARD ELEMENTS
5y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+18.6%)
3y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1007 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month