Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/838,624

ROBOTIC APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR PLANT TRANSPLANTATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Examiner
SAMPLE, JONATHAN L
Art Unit
3657
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Pure Impact Fzco
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
786 granted / 951 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
979
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 951 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Pursuant to communications filed on 15 August 2024, this is a First Action Non-Final Rejection on the Merits. Claims 1-15 is currently pending in the instant application. Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 13, as currently written, is dependent upon claim 11, however, based on the currently provided claim limitation (and potential antecedent basis issues), it appears that claim 13 should be dependent upon claim 12, and has been examined as such below. Accordingly, appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Alexander et al (US 2022/0007590 A1, hereinafter Alexander) in view of Huang et al (CN 110393107 A, hereinafter Huang; Examiner notes wherein an attached translation is provided with the referenced prior art, and further wherein referenced sections of the translation have been provided in the below rejection for the supporting teachings of Huang). Regarding claim 1, Alexander teaches an automated system (Figures 1 & 4, system 100) for multiple plant transplantation, comprising: a first robotic apparatus (Figures 1 & 4, robotic plant manipulator 150) for (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0010 and 0018-0020, specifically as in at least paragraph 0019, wherein “The system 100 can further include a robotic plant manipulator 150 arranged at the transfer station 140, including an optical sensor 152 proximal the end effector 154, and configured to…sequentially transfer a first subset of plants from the first module 110 to the second array of plant slots 121 in the second module 120, the first subset of plants including the first plants; and sequentially transfer a second subset of plants from the first module 110 to the third array of plant slots 123 in the third module 122 in response to filling the second set of plants slots in the second module 120, the second subset of plants succeeding the first subset of plants in the first module 110”); and a second robotic apparatus (Figures 1 & 4, vehicle 130) for placing the second set of trays comprising transplanted plants coming from a processing room in the grow room, and for picking up of the second set of trays from the grow room to the processing room for further transplantation, once the transplanted plants outgrow the second set of trays (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0018-0020, 0027 and 0032-0033, specifically as in at least paragraph 0019, wherein “The system 100 can also include a vehicle 130 configured to: autonomously navigate throughout the agricultural facility 102, autonomously deliver the first module 110 from the first grow location to the transfer station 140, autonomously deliver the second module 120 to adjacent the first module 110 at the transfer station 140, and autonomously deliver the third module 122 to adjacent the first module 110 in replacement of the second module 120 at the transfer station 140”, and further as in paragraph 0027, wherein “The vehicle 130 can thus detect these optical fiducials 114 to align itself to the latch, engage the latch accordingly, and then pull or push the module between its assigned location on the facility 102 floor and a module docking location adjacent a transfer station 140”). That said, Alexander is silent specifically regarding wherein the first robotic apparatus “simultaneously” picks up and places “2n plants at a time” as part of the transplantation between the first set of trays and second set of trays. Huang in the same field of endeavor of utilizing robotic systems and methods for transplanting plants, teaches a robotic manipulator that includes a camera for identifying one or more plants and further wherein said robotic manipulator is further configured to transplant said one or more plants between two respective locations. Huang goes on to teach wherein the robotic manipulator may be configured to pick up two or more plants at a time for transferring said plants from a first location to a second location (Figures 3 & 4; at least as in page 2, “summary of the invention” section, paragraph 3, beginning with “Further, the dividing device comprises a robot main body, a driving mechanism, a module fixing plate and a fixing base…” and further as in pages 5-6, “Specific Implementation methods” section, paragraphs 3 & 4, beginning with “In the present embodiment, the load distributing device…” and “the jaw device 105…” paragraphs respectively, and further as shown in reproduced Figure 4 below, which shows the robotic manipulator with a plurality of plant handling elements (105) provided). PNG media_image1.png 444 530 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the robotic plant manipulator of Alexander to include Huang’s plural plant handling robotic elements with said robotic manipulator, since Huang teaches wherein such an arrangement is good for reducing labor costs as well as improving the transplanting efficiency, thereby providing a more dynamic and efficient plant transplantation system/method. Regarding claim 2, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the first robotic apparatus is an articulated robotic arm and is operatively positioned in the processing room (Figures 1 & 4; at least as in paragraphs 0018-0020 and 0032-0033, at least as shown in the referenced Figures). Regarding claim 3, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the second robotic apparatus comprises an entry side and exit side transport robot and is operatively positioned in the grow room (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0018-0020, 0027 and 0032-0033, specifically as in at least paragraph 0019, wherein “The system 100 can also include a vehicle 130 configured to: autonomously navigate throughout the agricultural facility 102, autonomously deliver the first module 110 from the first grow location to the transfer station 140, autonomously deliver the second module 120 to adjacent the first module 110 at the transfer station 140, and autonomously deliver the third module 122 to adjacent the first module 110 in replacement of the second module 120 at the transfer station 140”). Regarding claim 4, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the first set of trays are densely packed trays and the second set of trays are less densely packed trays in comparison to the densely packed trays (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0010-0012, 0018-0020 and 0034, specifically at least wherein “plants are autonomously inspected and transferred from a first module no (e.g., a nursery-type module) containing a higher density of plants slots to a second module 120 (e.g., a finishing module) containing a lower density of plants slots”). Regarding claim 5, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Huang further teaches wherein the first robotic apparatus comprises a plurality of extensions or fingers at the end of the said robotic apparatus to facilitate picking up and placing the plants from the first set of trays arriving from the grow room to the second set of trays for transplantation of the said plants (Figures 3 & 4; at least as in page 2, “summary of the invention” section, paragraph 3, beginning with “Further, the dividing device comprises a robot main body, a driving mechanism, a module fixing plate and a fixing base…” and further as in pages 5-6, “Specific Implementation methods” section, paragraphs 3 & 4, beginning with “In the present embodiment, the load distributing device…” and “the jaw device 105…” paragraphs respectively, and specifically as shown in Figure 4, as provided in claim 1 above, which shows the robotic manipulator with a plurality of plant handling elements (105) provided). Regarding claim 6, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the entry side transport robot facilitates placing of trays coming from the processing room in the grow room, and the exit side transport robot facilitates picking up of trays from the grow room to the processing room for transplantation (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0018-0020, 0027 and 0032-0033, specifically as in at least paragraph 0019, wherein “The system 100 can also include a vehicle 130 configured to: autonomously navigate throughout the agricultural facility 102, autonomously deliver the first module 110 from the first grow location to the transfer station 140, autonomously deliver the second module 120 to adjacent the first module 110 at the transfer station 140, and autonomously deliver the third module 122 to adjacent the first module 110 in replacement of the second module 120 at the transfer station 140”, and further as in paragraph 0027, wherein “The vehicle 130 can thus detect these optical fiducials 114 to align itself to the latch, engage the latch accordingly, and then pull or push the module between its assigned location on the facility 102 floor and a module docking location adjacent a transfer station 140”). Regarding claim 7, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the entry side and exit side transport robots move along x and y-axes (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0018-0020, 0027 and 0032-0033, wherein the vehicle 130 includes the ability to move in x, y & z axes, including traveling throughout the agricultural facility while also having the ability to adjust its height). Regarding claim 8, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the first robotic apparatus is positioned in between conveyor belts, which perform continuous transportation of trays and wherein the first robotic apparatus performs transplantation of the plants (Figures 1, 5 & 6; at least as in paragraphs 0024, 0127-0130, 0156 and 0160-0166). Regarding claim 9, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the articulated robotic arm further comprises machine vision capability and a plurality of sensors (Figures 1 & 4; at least as in paragraphs 0018, 0022, 0034-0036, 0039 and 0046-0048). Regarding claim 10, Alexander teaches a process for multiple plant transplantation, the process comprising: (Figures 1 & 4, robotic plant manipulator 150) for transplantation of the said plants (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0010 and 0018-0020, specifically as in at least paragraph 0019, wherein “The system 100 can further include a robotic plant manipulator 150 arranged at the transfer station 140, including an optical sensor 152 proximal the end effector 154, and configured to…sequentially transfer a first subset of plants from the first module 110 to the second array of plant slots 121 in the second module 120, the first subset of plants including the first plants; and sequentially transfer a second subset of plants from the first module 110 to the third array of plant slots 123 in the third module 122 in response to filling the second set of plants slots in the second module 120, the second subset of plants succeeding the first subset of plants in the first module 110”); and placing the second set of trays comprising transplanted plants coming from a processing room in the grow room and picking up of the second set of trays from the grow room to the processing room using a second robotic apparatus (Figures 1 & 4, vehicle 130) for further transplantation, once the transplanted plants outgrow the second set of trays (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0018-0020, 0027 and 0032-0033, specifically as in at least paragraph 0019, wherein “The system 100 can also include a vehicle 130 configured to: autonomously navigate throughout the agricultural facility 102, autonomously deliver the first module 110 from the first grow location to the transfer station 140, autonomously deliver the second module 120 to adjacent the first module 110 at the transfer station 140, and autonomously deliver the third module 122 to adjacent the first module 110 in replacement of the second module 120 at the transfer station 140”, and further as in paragraph 0027, wherein “The vehicle 130 can thus detect these optical fiducials 114 to align itself to the latch, engage the latch accordingly, and then pull or push the module between its assigned location on the facility 102 floor and a module docking location adjacent a transfer station 140”). That said, Alexander is silent specifically regarding wherein the first robotic apparatus “simultaneously” picks up and places “2n plants at a time” as part of the transplantation between the first set of trays and second set of trays. Huang in the same field of endeavor of utilizing robotic systems and methods for transplanting plants, teaches a robotic manipulator that includes a camera for identifying one or more plants and further wherein said robotic manipulator is further configured to transplant said one or more plants between two respective locations. Huang goes on to teach wherein the robotic manipulator may be configured to pick up two or more plants at a time for transferring said plants from a first location to a second location (Figures 3 & 4; at least as in page 2, “summary of the invention” section, paragraph 3, beginning with “Further, the dividing device comprises a robot main body, a driving mechanism, a module fixing plate and a fixing base…” and further as in pages 5-6, “Specific Implementation methods” section, paragraphs 3 & 4, beginning with “In the present embodiment, the load distributing device…” and “the jaw device 105…” paragraphs respectively, and further as shown in reproduced Figure 4 below, which shows the robotic manipulator with a plurality of plant handling elements (105) provided). PNG media_image1.png 444 530 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the robotic plant manipulator of Alexander to include Huang’s plural plant handling robotic elements with said robotic manipulator, since Huang teaches wherein such an arrangement is good for reducing labor costs as well as improving the transplanting efficiency, thereby providing a more dynamic and efficient plant transplantation system/method. Regarding claim 11, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches the process further comprising continuing the transplantation process until the growing plants reach their lifetime growth capacity and are grown plants, subsequent to which packaging and marketing of the grown plants is done (Figures 1-4; at least as in paragraphs 0017, 0024 and 0050-0056, at least wherein the visual growth targets and/or plant size(s) is/are analyzed prior to transplantation between respective modules). Regarding claim 12, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Huang further teaches wherein the articulated robotic arm comprises a plurality of extensions or fingers at the end of the said robotic apparatus to facilitate picking up and placing the plants from the first tray arriving from the grow room to the second tray for transplantation of the said plants (Figures 3 & 4; at least as in page 2, “summary of the invention” section, paragraph 3, beginning with “Further, the dividing device comprises a robot main body, a driving mechanism, a module fixing plate and a fixing base…” and further as in pages 5-6, “Specific Implementation methods” section, paragraphs 3 & 4, beginning with “In the present embodiment, the load distributing device…” and “the jaw device 105…” paragraphs respectively, and specifically as shown in Figure 4, as provided in claim 10 above, which shows the robotic manipulator with a plurality of plant handling elements (105) provided). Regarding claim 13, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the plurality of extensions or fingers slide under structures holding the growing plants within the number of holes of the plurality of trays and lift up the growing plants without touching roots of the growing plants (Figures 1 & 4; at least as in paragraphs 0034-0036, 0091-0092 and 0160-0166, specifically at least wherein the robotic manipulator(s) is/are configured to engage with the respective plant cup(s)). Regarding claim 14, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Huang further teaches wherein the plurality of extensions or fingers enable simultaneous lifting and placing of 2n growing plants at a time, thereby enhancing efficiency of the transplantation process (Figures 3 & 4; at least as in page 2, “summary of the invention” section, paragraph 3, beginning with “Further, the dividing device comprises a robot main body, a driving mechanism, a module fixing plate and a fixing base…” and further as in pages 5-6, “Specific Implementation methods” section, paragraphs 3 & 4, beginning with “In the present embodiment, the load distributing device…” and “the jaw device 105…” paragraphs respectively, and specifically as shown in Figure 4, as provided in claim 1 above, which shows the robotic manipulator with a plurality of plant handling elements (105) provided). Regarding claim 15, in view of the above combination of Alexander and Huang, Alexander further teaches wherein the articulated robotic arm further comprises machine vision capability and a plurality of sensors (Figures 1 & 4; at least as in paragraphs 0018, 0022, 0034-0036, 0039 and 0046-0048). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892 – Notice of References Cited form. Examiner additionally notes the following references, in the same field of endeavor as the instant invention and also reads on many of the currently provided claim limitations above; US 2016/0144408 A1, issued to Struijk et al, which is directed towards an automated apparatus and method for sorting plant material units. US 2016/0057942 A1, issued to Ohshimo et al, which is directed towards a plant management system and corresponding method for inspecting plants in a container (i.e. tray, module, etc.) and based on said inspection transplanting said plants to another container with more space (i.e. density). US 2019/0307077 A1, issued to Lert, JR. et al, which is directed towards an automated vertical farming system that utilizes mobile robots for transporting containers and/or plants between respective locations. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN L SAMPLE whose telephone number is (571)270-5925. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Mott can be reached at (571)270-5376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN L SAMPLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599445
SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CART POWER SWITCHOVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594675
SURGICAL ROBOT, METHOD FOR GUIDING SURGICAL ARM TO MOVE THEREOF, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589755
SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING AN OUTPUT SIGNAL BASED ON A GENERATED SURROUNDINGS MODEL OF SURROUNDINGS OF A MOBILE PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589728
CHARGING CONTROL SYSTEM FOR IN-VEHICLE BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583102
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HANDLING A LOAD ARRANGEMENT WITH A ROBOT GRIPPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 951 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month