Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/838,920

GRAIN-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION OF SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Priority
Apr 04, 2022 — JP 2022-062583 +1 more
Examiner
FIGG, TRAVIS M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NIPPON STEEL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
254 granted / 412 resolved
+1.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
443
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
93.2%
+53.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 412 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1 and 2 are currently pending. Claim 2 is withdrawn from consideration. Election/Restriction Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claim 1, in the reply filed on 06/01/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 2 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 06/01/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takahashi et al. (US 2020/0362431 A1). Regarding claim 1, Takahashi teaches a grain-oriented electrical sheet comprising: a base material steel sheet having a plurality of grooves on a surface of the steel sheet and a glass coating on the surface of the base material steel sheet, in which grain oriented electrical steel sheet, has an angle θ formed by a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction and a sheet thickness direction of the base material steel sheet and a longitudinal direction of the grooves is 0 to 40°, a width W of the grooves is 20 to 300 µm, a depth D of the grooves is 10 to 40 µm, and a pitch P of the grooves in the rolling direction is 2.0 to 30.0 mm, which are all within the claimed ranges (Takahashi: abstract; par. 0019). The thickness of the glass coating is described to have a thickness difference throughout the channel of the peaks and valleys from the steel sheet which would include the flat part, side part, and the recess parts of said channels and have a thickness difference of 0.1 µm to 5 µm which means they may have a point in each of the 3 parts in which the thickness are the same which would meet the claimed formula (1) as the average of t2 and t3 may be equal to t1 (Takahashi: par. 0019). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Travis M Figg whose telephone number is (571)272-9849. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Maria Veronica D. Ewald can be reached at 571-272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRAVIS M FIGG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674053
Thermoplastic Resin Composition and Molded Product Manufactured Therefrom
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12649301
VEHICLE DASHBOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649290
AERONAUTICAL CASING PREFORM COMPRISING A FIBROUS WEB WITH TWO DEPLOYABLE PORTIONS
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12645253
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12643810
PRESSURE SENSOR, GLASS WAFER AND PRODUCTION METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+16.6%)
3y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 412 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month