Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/839,161

TEMPERATURE-CONTROL SYSTEM, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE TEMPERATURE OF A TEMPERATURE-CONTROL SYSTEM, AND MOTOR VEHICLE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 16, 2024
Priority
Feb 22, 2022 — DE 10 2022 104 200.6 +1 more
Examiner
ARANT, HARRY E
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kautex Textron GmbH & Co. KG
OA Round
2 (Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
285 granted / 582 resolved
-21.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
639
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 582 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims The status of the claims as filed in the reply dated 5/4/2026 are as follows: Claims 1-6, 11, 14, and 17 are amended, Claims 1-17 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6, 9, and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thompson (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0258063, previously cited) in view of Boll et al. (German Patent Publication DE4408960C1, “Boll”, previously cited) and in further view of Jiang (Chinese Patent Publication CN110459818A, previously cited) in view of Park et al. (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0194491, “Park”). Regarding claim 1, Thompson discloses a temperature control system (fig 1) for controlling a temperature of a traction battery of a motor vehicle using a heat transfer medium in a temperature control circuit, the temperature control system comprising: a battery housing (of 20) including an evaporation device (50) for evaporating the heat transfer medium; a collecting container (46) for receiving the heat transfer medium, the collecting container operatively connected to a heating device (“resistance heater”, ¶0007) for heating the heat transfer medium; a heat transfer device (50) which has a condenser (50) for cooling the heat transfer medium; a pump (90) for conveying the heat transfer medium; and an electronic control unit (40), wherein the electronic control unit is designed to receive a temperature of the at least one designated battery cell, in accordance with at least one specific manipulated variable of the temperature control system, to control the temperature of the at least one designated battery cell (¶0008). However, Thompson does not explicitly disclose wherein the evaporation device forms a closed interior with at least one receiving position for at least one battery cell; a lower region of the battery housing being designed to receive the heat transfer medium. Boll, however, discloses a temperature control system wherein an evaporation device (21) forms a closed interior (of chamber 20) with at least one receiving position for at least one battery cell (in 20); a lower region of the battery housing being designed to receive a heat transfer medium (in 21). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the evaporation device configuration of Boll in order to provide optimal cooling of the battery. However, Thompson does not explicitly disclose wherein the heating device is designed to be able to vary a first temperature of the heat transfer medium in the collecting container as function of a heating device manipulated variable; wherein the heat transfer device is designed to vary a second temperature of the heat transfer medium at a fluid drain of the condenser as a function of a heat transfer device manipulated variable; the pump being designed to vary a heat transfer medium volume flow as a function of a pump manipulated variable. Jiang, however, discloses a temperature control system wherein a heating device is designed to be able to vary a first temperature of the heat transfer medium in the collecting container as a function of a heating device specific manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41); wherein a heat transfer device is designed to vary a second temperature of the heat transfer medium at a fluid drain of the condenser depending on a heat transfer device specific manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41); a pump being designed to vary a heat transfer medium volume flow as a function of a pump manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the manipulated variables of Jiang in order to optimize the temperature control of the battery. However, Thompson does not explicitly disclose wherein the heating device is disposed within the collecting container for heating the heat transfer medium via direct contact with the heating device. Park, however, discloses wherein a heating device (40, fig 1) is disposed in a collecting container (10) for heating the heat transfer medium via direct contact with the heating device. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the heating device in the collecting container as taught by Park in order to reduce the need for separate components and thus reduce the size of the apparatus. Regarding claim 2, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson, as modified, further discloses wherein the at least one specific manipulated variable comprises the heating device manipulated variable (such as taught by Boll, see page 6, lines 38-41). Regarding claim 3, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson, as modified, further discloses wherein the at least one specific manipulated variable comprises the pump manipulated variable (such as taught by Boll, see page 6, lines 38-41). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson, as modified, further discloses wherein the at least one specific manipulated variable comprises the heat transfer device manipulated variable (such as taught by Boll, see page 6, lines 38-41). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson, as modified, does not explicitly disclose wherein: the heat transfer device has a secondary fluid circuit, the heat transfer device is designed to vary the second temperature of the heat transfer medium at the fluid drain of the condenser depending on a secondary fluid circuit manipulated variable; and the at least one specific manipulated variable comprises the secondary fluid circuit manipulated variable. Boll, however, discloses wherein: a heat transfer device (9) has a secondary fluid circuit (5), the heat transfer device is designed to vary the second temperature of the heat transfer medium at the fluid drain of the condenser depending on a secondary fluid circuit manipulated variable (8, page 3, lines 8-27); and the manipulated variable comprises the secondary fluid circuit manipulated variable (8, page 3, lines 8-27). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to enhance the cooling of the working fluid. Regarding claim 6, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson, as modified, further discloses wherein: the heat transfer device has a fan for conveying an air flow (such as taught by Jiang, see page 6, lines 38-41), wherein the heat transfer device is designed to vary the second temperature of the heat transfer medium at the fluid drain of the condenser depending on a fan manipulated variable (such as taught by Jiang, see page 6, lines 38-41); and the manipulated variable comprises the fan manipulated variable (such as taught by Jiang, see page 6, lines 38-41). Regarding claim 9, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson further discloses wherein: a three-way valve (40) is arranged between the condenser (50) of the heat transfer device and the battery housing (20); the three-way valve is at least indirectly fluidically connected to the collecting container (46); the three-way valve is designed to provide a fluidic connection between the battery housing and the condenser depending on a three-way valve manipulated variable (via 22); and the at least one specific manipulated variable comprises the three-way valve manipulated variable (¶0008-0010). Regarding claim 17, Thompson discloses a motor vehicle comprising a temperature control system (fig 1) comprising: a battery housing (of 20) including an evaporation device (50) for evaporating the heat transfer medium; a collecting container (46) for receiving the heat transfer medium, in particular a collecting container operatively connected to a heating device (“resistance heater”, ¶0007) for heating the heat transfer medium; a heat transfer device (50) which has a condenser for cooling the heat transfer medium; a pump (90) for conveying the heat transfer medium; and an electronic control unit (40), wherein the electronic control unit is designed to receive a temperature of the at least one designated battery cell, in accordance with at least one manipulated variable of the temperature control system, to control the temperature of the at least one designated battery cell (¶0008). However, Thompson does not explicitly disclose wherein the evaporation device forms a closed interior with at least one receiving position for at least one battery cell; a lower region of the battery housing being designed to receive the heat transfer medium. Boll, however, discloses a temperature control system wherein an evaporation device (21) forms a closed interior (of chamber 20) with at least one receiving position for at least one battery cell (in 20); a lower region of the battery housing being designed to receive a heat transfer medium (in 21). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the evaporation device configuration of Boll in order to provide efficient cooling of the battery. However, Thompson does not explicitly disclose wherein the heating device is designed to be able to vary a first temperature of the heat transfer medium in the collecting container as a function of a heating device manipulated variable; wherein the heat transfer device is designed to vary a second temperature of the heat transfer medium at a fluid drain of the condenser as a function of a heat transfer device manipulated variable; the pump being designed to vary a heat transfer medium volume flow as a function of a pump manipulated variable. Jiang, however, discloses a temperature control system wherein a heating device is designed to be able to vary a first temperature of the heat transfer medium in the collecting container as a function of a heating device manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41); wherein a heat transfer device is designed to vary a second temperature of the heat transfer medium at a fluid drain of the condenser depending on a heat transfer device manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41); a pump being designed to vary a heat transfer medium volume flow as a function of a pump manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the manipulated variables of Jiang in order to optimize the temperature control of the battery. However, Thompson does not explicitly disclose wherein the heating device is disposed within the collecting container for heating the heat transfer medium via direct contact with the heating device. Park, however, discloses wherein a heating device (40, fig 1) is disposed in a collecting container (10) for heating the heat transfer medium via direct contact with the heating device. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the heating device in the collecting container as taught by Park in order to reduce the need for separate components and thus reduce the size of the apparatus. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Rheaume et al U.S. Patent Publication No. 2020/030792, “Rheaume”, previously cited). Regarding claim 7, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. However, they do not explicitly disclose wherein the pump is a diaphragm pump designed to a change a conveying direction of the heat transfer medium. Rheaume, however, discloses a temperature control system (fig 1) wherein a pump (109) is a diaphragm pump (¶0019) designed to a change a conveying direction of the heat transfer medium (as this is inherent to a diaphragm pump). Rheaume teaches that the pump can be any kind of pump suitable for moving a working fluid (¶0019). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide a diaphragm pump in order to efficiently circulate the working fluid. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Bolton et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,294,916, “Bolton”, previously cited). Regarding claim 8, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. However, they do not explicitly disclose a sensor for determining the conductivity of the heat transfer medium. Bolton, however, discloses a temperature control system wherein a sensor is used for determining the conductivity of the heat transfer medium (col 1, lines 29-47). Bolton teaches that this allows for the heat transfer medium to maintain a minimum conductivity (col 1, lines 29-47). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the sensor of Bolton in order to ensure the heat transfer medium maintains a minimum conductivity. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Porras et al. (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2018/015231, “Porras”, previously cited). Regarding claim 10, the combination of Thompson, Boll, Jiang, and Park discloses all previous claim limitations. However, they do not explicitly disclose wherein the temperature control system is designed to limit an electrical power of the at least one battery cell. Porras, however, discloses a temperature control system which is designed to limit an electrical power of the at least one battery cell (¶0032). Porras teaches that this prevents overheating (¶0032). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to limit an electrical power to the battery in order to prevent overheating. Claim(s) 11, 13-14, and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thompson (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0258063, previously cited) in view of Newman et al. (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2018/0304765, “Newman”, previously cited) and in further view of Mattmuller et al. (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2019/0344670, “Mattmuller”). Regarding claim 11, Thompson discloses a method for controlling a temperature control behavior of a temperature control system determining (via 22) a temperature of at least one battery cell (20); and/or determining a wet steam content at a fluid drain of a battery housing (via 44 and 46); determining a state of the at least one battery cell, in particular determining whether there is as one of a heating requirement or a cooling requirement (¶0008-0010). However, Thompson does teach determining whether there is a fault in the battery. Newman, however, discloses a temperature control system which determines whether there is a fault in the battery (¶0138). Newman teaches that this prevents overheating (¶0138). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to limit an electrical power to the battery in order to prevent overheating. However, Thompson does not explicitly disclose determining a current strength of the at least one battery cell. Mattmuller, however, discloses a method for controlling the temperature of a battery cell which determines a current strength of the at least one battery cell (¶0019). Mattmuller teaches cooling the battery when the current strength increases (¶0019). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to determine a current strength of the at least one battery cell in order to more optimally maintain Regarding claim 13, the combination of Thompson, Newman, and Mattmuller discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson, as modified, further discloses wherein after determination of a fault, electrical power of the at least one battery cell is limited (¶0138, Newman). Regarding claim 14, the combination of Thompson, Newman, and Mattmuller discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson further discloses wherein after determination of a heating requirement (see ¶0008), by specifying a corresponding three-way valve (40) manipulated variable (see ¶0008-0010), a fluidic connection is provided between the battery housing (20) and a collecting container (46), wherein the heat transfer medium is conducted past the condenser (50). Regarding claim 16, the combination of Thompson, Newman, and Mattmuller discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson further discloses a regulation for controlling the temperature control behavior of the temperature control system is model-based at least in some regions (as the model described in ¶0008-0010 would be applied in all regions). Claim(s) 12 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thompson, Newman, and Mattmuller as applied to claim 11 above, and further in view of Jiang (Chinese Patent Publication CN110459818A, previously cited). Regarding claim 12, the combination of Thompson, Newman, and Mattmuller discloses all previous claim limitations. Thompson, as modified, further discloses wherein after determination of a fault, a second temperature of a heat transfer medium at the fluid drain of a condenser is controlled to be minimized (as the fault is due to overheating, see ¶0138 of Newman). However, they do not explicitly disclose by specifying at least one of: a corresponding secondary fluid circuit manipulated variable, a corresponding fan manipulated variable, and/or a corresponding pump manipulated variable. Jiang, however, discloses a temperature control system wherein a heating device is designed to be able to vary a first temperature of the heat transfer medium in the collecting container depending on a heating device manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41); wherein a heat transfer device is designed to vary a second temperature of the heat transfer medium at a fluid drain of the condenser depending on a heat transfer device manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41); a pump being designed to vary a heat transfer medium volume flow depending on a pump manipulated variable (page 6, lines 38-41). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide the manipulated variables of Jiang in order to optimize the temperature control of the battery. Regarding claim 15, the combination of Thompson, Newman, and Mattmuller discloses all previous claim limitations. Thomson further discloses wherein after determination of a cooling requirement (see ¶0008), the wet steam content at the fluid drain of the battery housing (outlet of battery housing 20) is controlled to be optimized (¶0009-0010); However, they do not explicitly disclose by specifying a corresponding pump manipulated variable. Jiang, however, discloses a temperature control system wherein a corresponding pump manipulated variable determines a temperature of a wet stream content at the fluid drain of the battery housing is controlled to be optimized (page 6, lines 38-41). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Thompson to provide pump manipulated variable to allow more precise cooling and heating of the battery. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/4/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues (pages 9-11) that none of the cited references teaching the heating device being disposed in the collecting container as now required by claims 1 and 17. However, newly cited Park is now being relied upon to teach these limitations. Applicant argues (pages 12-13) that none of the cited references teach determine a current strength of the at least one battery cell as now required by claim 11. However, newly cited Mattmuller is now relied upon to teach this limitation. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY E ARANT whose telephone number is (571)272-1105. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jianying Atkisson can be reached at (571)270-7740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY E ARANT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 16, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 04, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697852
MITIGATING AIRLOCK IN COOLING CHANNELS FOR LARGE AREA COOLING SYSTEMS FOR BATTERIES
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12680765
LATENT HEAT STORAGE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672260
HEAT DISSIPATION DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663218
SUSPENSION PYLON FOR AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE FITTED WITH A COUNTERFLOW COOLING EXCHANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653165
AQUATIC THERMAL REFUGIUM SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHODS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+22.1%)
3y 6m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month