Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/840,381

BRAKING CONTROL DEVICE FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Mar 10, 2022 — JP 2022-036959 +1 more
Examiner
AUNG, SAN M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Advics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
870 granted / 1119 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1149
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1119 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the phrase “in a case where the lower braking unit pressurizes the wheel pressure, the upper braking unit reduces a rotation number of the electric motor as compared with a case where the lower braking unit does not pressurize the wheel pressure” is unclear what is meant by “the upper braking unit reduces a rotation number of the electric motor when the lower braking unit pressurizes the wheel pressure, as compared with the lower braking unit does not pressurize the wheel pressure”. Regarding the phrase “rotation number” is indefinite because it is unclear what is meant by “rotation number”. For example, it refers to RPM or reduction of the pump/motor speed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yamamoto et al. (US – 2020/0339082 A1). As per claim 1, Yamamoto discloses Vehicle Brake device comprising: an upper braking unit (4, Fig: 1) configured to pressurize a supply pressure by throttling, with a pressure adjustment valve (41, 42, The servo pressure generation device 4 includes a pressure reducing valve 41 (corresponding “pressure adjusting electromagnetic valve”), a pressure increasing valve 42 (corresponding to “pressure adjusting electromagnetic valve”, [0039], Fig: 1), a circulation flow discharged by a fluid pump driven (432, Fig: 1) by an electric motor (433, Fig: 1); and a lower braking unit (5, Fig: 1 and 3) disposed between the upper braking unit and a wheel cylinder (W, Fig: 1) and configured to pressurize the supply pressure to output a wheel pressure to the wheel cylinder (The actuator 5 is disposed between the first master chamber 1D and second master chamber 1E in which the master pressure is generated and the wheel cylinders 541 to 544, [0059], Fig: 1 and 3), wherein in a case where the lower braking unit pressurizes the wheel pressure, the upper braking unit reduces a rotation number of the electric motor as compared with a case where the lower braking unit does not pressurize the wheel pressure, (the actuator 5 includes a hydraulic circuit 5A, and an electric motor 90. The hydraulic circuit 5A includes a first pipe system 50a, and a second pipe system 50b. The first pipe system 50a is a system configured to control fluid pressures (wheel pressures) that are applied to rear wheels Wrl and Wrr. The second pipe system 50bis a system configured to control fluid pressures (wheel pressures) that are applied to front wheels Wfl and Wfr. Also, each of the wheels W is provided with a wheel speed sensor 76. In the first embodiment, a front and rear pipe is adopted, [0059] – [0060], Fig: 1 and 3). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is allowed. Prior art fails to disclose when the lower braking unit does not pressurize the wheel pressure, control a rotation number of the electric motor based on an instruction flow rate calculated from the target pressure and a compensation flow rate calculated from the supply pressure, and when the lower braking unit pressurizes the wheel pressure, control the rotation number of the electric motor based only on the compensation flow rate. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A: MARUYAMA et al. (US – 2021/0221231 A1), B: ASANO et al. (US – 2020/0198603 A1), and C: Maruyama et al. (US – 2013/0255249 A1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAN M AUNG whose telephone number is (571)270-5792. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAN M AUNG/Examiner, Art Unit 3616 /DAVID R MORRIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746974
CYLINDRICAL MOUNT
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747763
BRAKE DUST COLLECTOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742482
DISC BRAKE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736097
Brake Assembly and Method for Controlling a Brake Assembly
5y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734855
DUAL RATE VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEM WITH ADJUSTABLE RIDE HEIGHT
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+20.4%)
2y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1119 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month