Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/840,533

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 18, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022012784
Examiner
CORUM JR, WILLIAM A
Art Unit
2433
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
353 granted / 469 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
479
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
78.5%
+38.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 469 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 3, 7, 10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 3 appears to be requiring the replacement of elements (a) to (e) in claim 1 with elements (a) – (c) and (f) and (g) as recited in claim 3. This essentially requires elements (d) and (e) to be omitted from claim 1 when incorporated in claim 3. This renders claim 3 an improper dependent claim since 35 U.S.C. 112(d) requires that a dependent claim incorporates all the limitation of the independent claim from which it depends. Claim 7 appears to be requiring the replacement of elements (a) to (e) in claim 5 with elements (a) – (c) and (f) and (g) as recited in claim 7. This essentially requires elements (d) and (e) to be omitted from claim 5 when incorporated in claim 7. This renders claim 7 an improper dependent claim since 35 U.S.C. 112(d) requires that a dependent claim incorporates all the limitation of the independent claim from which it depends. Claim 10 appears to be requiring the replacement of elements (a) to (e) in claim 8 with elements (a) – (c) and (f) and (g) as recited in claim 10. This essentially requires elements (d) and (e) to be omitted from claim 8 when incorporated in claim 10. This renders claim 10 an improper dependent claim since 35 U.S.C. 112(d) requires that a dependent claim incorporates all the limitation of the independent claim from which it depends. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8, 9 are allowed. Claims 3, 7 and 10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 4th paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM A CORUM JR whose telephone number is (303)297-4234. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Fri. 8 AM - 5 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Pwu can be reached at (571)272-6798. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WILLIAM A. CORUM JR Primary Examiner Art Unit 2433 william.corum2@uspto.gov /WILLIAM A CORUM JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2433
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12632731
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626262
Single Step Transaction Authentication Using Proximity and Biometric Input
3y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625935
METHOD OF REGISTERING BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATION INFORMATION OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE, BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING INSTRUCTIONS TO PERFORM BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619698
AUTHENTICATION APPARATUS, SYSTEM, METHOD, AND PROGRAM
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619701
USER INTERFACES FOR AUTHENTICATING TO PERFORM SECURE OPERATIONS
1y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
2y 7m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 469 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month