Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/840,716

METHOD FOR RECYCLING CARBON DIOXIDE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SOLID CARBIDE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 09, 2022 — JP 2022-035994 +1 more
Examiner
FIORITO, JAMES A
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tohoku University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
531 granted / 742 resolved
+6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 742 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, and 8-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cho US 2018/0179071. Regarding claim 1, and 8, Cho teaches a process of making silicon carbide by reacting an element including a silicon containing compound with carbon dioxide (Paragraph [0010]) via an exothermic reaction (Paragraph [0062]). Regarding claims 2-4, and 8-11, Cho teaches that the element and silicon containing compound may include silicon and a metal such as magnesium (Paragraph [0026]-[0027]). Regarding claim 5, and 12 the generated silicon carbide may be washed with sodium hydroxide (Paragraph [0055]). Regarding claims 6, and 13 the reaction is exothermic, which would inherently result in a temperature of higher than 30 deg. C (Paragraph [0062], Examples). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cho US 2018/0179071. Regarding claim 7, and 14, Cho does not expressly state that the reactants are heated with a microwave of halogen lamp. However, the use of microwaves and/or halogen lamps are well known in the art for facilitating the activation of chemical reactions. Thus, it would have been obvious to the person having ordinary skill in the art to use a microwave or halogen lamp to facilitate the activation of the chemical reaction of the reactants. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A FIORITO whose telephone number is (571)272-9921. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A FIORITO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12760444
SINGLE-CRYSTAL DIAMOND AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763328
TERNARY PRECURSOR AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, TERNARY POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL, AND ELECTRIC APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753076
BORON NITRIDE POWDER, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BORON NITRIDE POWDER, RESIN MATERIAL, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING RESIN MATERIAL
4y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753136
CATALYTIC HYDROGENATION OF FLUOROOLEFINS, ALPHA- ALUMINA SUPPORTED PALLADIUM COMPOSITIONS AND THEIR USE AS HYDROGENATION CATALYSTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741869
SODIUM BOROHYDRIDE PRODUCTION METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.0%)
2y 11m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 742 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month