Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/841,068

INTER-LINK INTERFERENCE MANAGEMENT FOR DATA LINK VIA COVERAGE ENHANCING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Priority
Mar 06, 2022 — SE 2250300-7 +1 more
Examiner
PHAM, BRENDA H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1079 granted / 1189 resolved
+30.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1205
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1189 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-18, 21 and 24 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 23 August 2024 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 21 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by SAMSUNG: “Cross-link interference measurements and reporting at a UE”, 3GPP DRAFT; R1-1901063 CLI AT UE, 3rd GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (3GPP), MOBILE COMETENCE CENTRE; 650, ROUTE DES LUCIOLES; F-06921 SOPHIA_ANTIPOLIS CEDEX; FRANCE, vol. RAN WG1, no. Taipei, Taiwan; 20190121-20190125, 20 January 2019 (2019-01-20), XP051593908, [retrieved from the Internet; URL:/http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Meetings%5F3GPP%5FSYNC/RAN1/Docs/R1%2D1901063%2Ezip [retrieved on 2019-01-20], paragraph [0002]-paragraph [03.1]; figure 2, hereinafter referred as D1. Regarding claims 1, 21 and 24, D1 discloses a method of operating a first base station (§3.1 and Fig. 5; “gNB1”), the method comprising: communicating, between the first base station and a second base station, at least one control message for interference management (§3.1: “gNB1 can let gNB2 know the SRS/DMRS patterns of the IAB node 1 via information exchange in backhaul. Then, gNB2 can assign ZP CSI-RS to IAB node 2 and IAB node 2 can perform channel measurement.”) of a interference between a first data link between the first base station (101) a first wireless communication device (Fig. 5: gNB1-Interfering IAB node 1-UE1) and a second data link between the second base station and a second wireless communication device (Fig. 5: gNB2-Victim IAB node 2-UE2), the first data link being via a coverage enhancing device (Fig. 5: gNB1-Interfering IAB node1-UE1), and in accordance with the at least one control message, configuring a setting of one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device that are associated with the first data link (§2: “the main benefit of RSRP is that the aggressor UE can be identified. With such aggressor information, the gNB can easily coordinate the scheduling of aggressor and victim UEs to mitigate strong CLI and achieve better performance”). Claim(s) 1, 21 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by (WO 2021/045672 A1). Regarding claims 1, 21 and 24, (WO 2021/045672 A1) discloses a method of operating a first base station, the method comprising: communicating, between the first base station (Cell A, TRP A, figure 2) and a second base station (Cell B, TRP B, figure 2), at least one control message for interference management of a interference (CLI) between a first data link (UL) between the first base station (TRP A) a first wireless communication device (UE-1) and a second data link (DL, figure 2) between the second base station (TRP B) and a second wireless communication device (UE-2), the first data link being via a coverage enhancing device, and in accordance with the at least one control message, configuring a setting of one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device that are associated with the first data link (“Receiving the configuration of a condition controlling when the UE shall start performing CLI measurements (e.g., a parameter that is a threshold for a given measurement)”. PNG media_image1.png 478 920 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim(s) 1, 14-17, 21 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by (WO 2022/029197 A1). Regarding claims 1, 21 and 24, (WO 2022/029197 A1) discloses a method of operating a first base station, the method comprising: communicating, between the first base station (BS1) and a second base station (BS2), at least one control message for interference management of a interference (BS-to-BS interference, (DL-to-UL interference) between a first data link (1808) between the first base station (BS1) a first wireless communication device (UE-1) and a second data link (1806) between the second base station (BS2) and a second wireless communication device (UE2), the first data link being via a coverage enhancing device, and in accordance with the at least one control message, configuring a setting of one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device that are associated with the first data link. Regarding claim 14, (WO 2022/029197 A1) teaches wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a time-division duplex slot configuration. (“half-duplex or full-duplex). Regarding claim 15, (WO 2022/029197 A1) teaches wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a spatial filter. (“identifying the interference device comprises a combination of information obtained from the reference signal of the interfering device together with its timeslot and the setting of the spatial filter used in the receiving device.”) Regarding claim 16, (WO 2022/029197 A1) wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a gain. (“Higher gain. The gain is higher, because the array gain is on the order of the number of elements in the array.”) Regarding claim 17, (WO 2022/029197 A1) wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a phase. (“A phase distribution may be used to steer the beam or main lobe 12 in the required direction, e.g., using a uniform power distribution.”). Claim(s) 1, 21 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Vedantham et al. (US 2011/0117967 A1). Regarding claims 1, 21 and 24, Vedantham et al. discloses a method of operating a first base station, the method comprising: communicating, between the first base station (Base station 1) and a second base station (Base station 2), at least one control message for interference management of a interference (110) between a first data link (114) between the first base station (Base station 1) a first wireless communication device (User Equipment 1) and a second data link (116) between the second base station (Base station 2) and a second wireless communication device (User Equipment 2), the first data link being via a coverage enhancing device ([0002]: “As cellular communication network evolve, smaller sized cells, e.g., picocells and/or femtocells (“femtocells”), are being introduced to enhance service with areas where the cellular network is not overloaded or network coverage is weaker than desired“), and in accordance with the at least one control message, configuring a setting of one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device that are associated with the first data link. (“compute threshold values for interference tiers based on stored interference estimate statistics”). PNG media_image2.png 715 1059 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim(s) 1, 14-16, 21 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Abdelghaffar et al. (US 2021/0152418 A1). Regarding claims 1, 21 and 24, Abdlghaffar et al. discloses a method of operating a first base, the method comprising: communicating, between the first base station (105-a) and a second base station (105-b), at least one control message for interference management of a interference (220-d) between a first data link (210-1) between the first base station (105-a) and a first wireless communication device (115-a) and a second data link (205-b) between the second base station (105-b) and a second wireless communication device (115-b), the first data link being via a coverage enhancing device, and in accordance with the at least one control message, configuring a setting of one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device that are associated with the first data link ([0226]: “the base station 105 may transmit an indication of one or more spatial filters”). PNG media_image3.png 661 615 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, Abdlghaffar et al. teaches wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a time-division duplex slot configuration. Regarding claim 15, Abdlghaffar et al. teaches wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a spatial filter. ([0091]: “receiving an indication of one or more spatial filters or TCI for uplink transmissions, where transmitting the first message using the first antenna panel may be based on the one or more spatial filters or the TCI.”) Regarding claim 16, wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a gain. (“in this solution the threshold may be the s-Measure, which gains a different meaning”) Regarding claim 17, wherein the one or more operational parameters of the coverage enhancing device comprise a phase. ([0169]: “The adjustment of signals communicated via the antenna elements may include a transmitting device or a receiving device applying amplitude offsets, phase offsets, or both to signals carried via the antenna element associated with the device.”) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-13 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRENDA H PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-3135. The examiner can normally be reached 571-272-3135. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Jiang can be reached at 571-270-7191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRENDA H. PHAM Primary Examiner Art Unit 2412 /BRENDA H PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745135
METHOD FOR DATA TRANSMISSION AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739593
COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES USING PASSIVE BEACONS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739079
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCING LINK ADAPTATION IN WIRELESS NETWORK
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739043
METHODS, ARCHITECTURES, APPARATUSES AND SYSTEMS FOR BEAM MANAGEMENT OF INTELLIGENT REFLECTING SURFACES
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726978
INDICATIONS OF PRECODER AND TRANSMISSION LAYER FOR SUBSCRIBER DATA MANAGEMENT BASED SIMULATION UPLINK TRANSMISSION
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+2.0%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1189 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month