Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/841,136

POWER CONTROL FOR SIMULTANEOUS PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL (PUSCH) TRANSMISSION IN A CELL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 22, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022088452
Examiner
TOKUTA, SHEAN S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
407 granted / 513 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
535
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
85.4%
+45.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 513 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the pending claims, 16-35, received 08 November 2022. Accordingly, the detailed action of claims 16-35 is as follows: Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/16/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 16-18, 22-23, 25, 31-33, 34 and 35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang et al (US 20230048026 A1, hereafter referred to as Huang). Regarding claim 16, Huang teaches a user equipment (UE) for wireless communication, comprising: at least one memory (Huang [0042]); and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the UE (Huang [0042]) to: receive a configuration to configure multiple maximum output power values in a bandwidth part (BWP) of a carrier of a serving cell based at least in part on the UE being indicated with a first Uplink (UL) or joint Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) state and a second UL or joint TCI state (Huang [Fig 13-1306 and 394] teaches configuring a UE with a plurality of SRS resource sets, power control parameters and Pcmax, wherein the resource sets, power control parameters and Pcmax are associated with a respective panel and used to determine transmission power on an active UL BWP of a carrier of a serving cell [0196]); and determine transmit power for UL transmission according to the configured maximum output power values corresponding to at least one of the first UL or joint TCI state or the second UL or joint TCI state associated with the UL transmission (Huang [0196] teaches determining transmit power for uplink transmissions based on power control parameters associated with the respective TRP [0362], wherein maximum transmit powers associated with multiple UE panels and corresponding UL beams are configured to the UE by system information or the BS). Regarding claim 17, Huang teaches the limitations of claim 16, as rejected above. Additionally, Huang teaches the UE wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause the UE to receive a first Downlink Control Information (DCI) associated with a first coresetPoolIndex value and a second DCI associated with a second coresetPoolIndex value different from the first coresetPoolIndex value, in the BWP of the carrier of the serving cell, the first DCI scheduling a first physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission associated with the first coresetPoolIndex value and the second DCI scheduling a second PUSCH transmission associated with the second coresetPoolIndex value, the first PUSCH transmission and the second PUSCH transmission being in one slot (Huang [0345] teaches a first and second PUSCH scheduled by different DCIs, wherein the first DCI in a first coreset with a first coresetPoolIndex schedules a first PUSCH and a second DCI associated with a second coreset and different coresetPoolIndex schedules a second PUSCH, wherein the first and second PUSCH are in one slot [Fig 12]). Regarding claim 18, Huang teaches the limitations of claim 16, as rejected above. Additionally, Huang teaches the UE wherein the UL transmission comprises one or more of the first PUSCH transmission or the second PUSCH transmission (Huang [Fig 10-1010 and 0253] teaches the first and second PUSCH are transmitted concurrently using overlapped resources). Regarding claim 22, Huang teaches the limitations of claim 16, as rejected above. Additionally, Huang teaches the UE wherein, if the configuration configures a first maximum output power value PcMAx,f,co associated with the first PUSCH transmission and a second maximum output power value PcMAx,f,c,1 associated with the second PUSCH transmission (Huang [0362, 0401] teaches a maximum transmit power associated with multiple panels corresponding to UL beams and TCI state), and the first PUSCH transmission and the second PUSCH transmission are scheduled to be overlapped in the one slot (Huang [Fig 10] teaches scheduling a plurality of PUSCH wherein the resources are overlapped [Fig 10-1010]), then: the transmit power for the first PUSCH transmission is determined according to the first maximum output power value PcMAx,f,c,o associated with the first PUSCH transmission, power control parameters with a first indicated TCI state associated with the first coresetPoolIndex value used for the first PUSCH transmission, and the first DCI (Huang [0362, 0401] teaches a maximum transmit power associated with multiple panels corresponding to UL beams and TCI state wherein the transmit power is determined according to the maximum output power [0196], power control parameters associated with the panel [0396-0399] and the DCI scheduling the UL [Fig 10-1006, 1008]); and the transmit power for the second PUSCH transmission is determined according to the second maximum output power value PcMAx,f,c,1 associated with the second PUSCH transmission, power control parameters associated with a second indicated TCI state associated with the second coresetPoolIndex value used for the second PUSCH transmission, and the second DCI (Huang [0362, 0401] teaches a maximum transmit power associated with multiple panels corresponding to UL beams and TCI state wherein the transmit power is determined according to the maximum output power [0196], power control parameters associated with the panel [0396-0399] and the DCI scheduling the UL [Fig 10-1006, 1008]). Regarding claim 23, Huang teaches the limitations of claim 16, as rejected above. Additionally, Huang teaches the UE wherein, if the configuration configures a first maximum output power value PcMAx,f,c,o associated with the first PUSCH transmission (Huang [0362, 0401] teaches a maximum transmit power associated with multiple panels corresponding to UL beams and TCI state_, a second maximum output power value PCMAx,f,c,1 associated with the second PUSCH transmission (Huang [0362, 0401] teaches a maximum transmit power associated with multiple panels corresponding to UL beams and TCI state), and an additional maximum output power valuePCMAX,f,c,which is smaller than PcMAx,f,c,o+PCMAx,f,c,1 and larger than each ofPCMAX,f,c, (Huang [0362, 0406] teaches a third maximum transmit power for uplink) and, and the first PUSCH transmission and the second PUSCH transmission are scheduled to be non-overlapped in the one slot (Huang [Fig 10] teaches scheduling a plurality of PUSCH wherein the resources are overlapped [Fig 10-1010]), then: the transmit power for the first PUSCH transmission is determined according to the first maximum output power value PcMAx,f,c,o associated with the first PUSCH transmission, power control parameters with a first indicated TCI state associated with the first coresetPoolIndex value used for the first PUSCH transmission, and the first DCI (Huang [0362, 0401] teaches a maximum transmit power associated with multiple panels corresponding to UL beams and TCI state wherein the transmit power is determined according to the maximum output power [0196], power control parameters associated with the panel [0396-0399] and the DCI scheduling the UL [Fig 10-1006, 1008]); and the transmit power for the second PUSCH transmission is determined according to the second maximum output power value PcMAx,f,c,1 associated with the second PUSCH transmission, power control parameters associated with a second indicated TCI state associated with the second coresetPoolIndex value used for the second PUSCH transmission, and the second DCI (Huang [0362, 0401] teaches a maximum transmit power associated with multiple panels corresponding to UL beams and TCI state wherein the transmit power is determined according to the maximum output power [0196], power control parameters associated with the panel [0396-0399] and the DCI scheduling the UL [Fig 10-1006, 1008]). Regarding claim 25, Huang teaches the limitations of claim 16, as rejected above. Additionally, Huang teaches the UE wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause the UE to report a power headroom report (PHR) including two or more power headroom (PH) values according to configured one or more maximum output power values (Huang [0332-0333]). Regarding claims 30-33, they do not teach or further limit over the limitations presented above with respect to claims 16-18. Therefore, claims 30-33 are rejected for the same reasons set forth above regarding claims 16-18. Regarding claim 34, it does not teach or further limit over the limitations presented above with respect to claim 16. Therefore, claim 34 is rejected for the same reasons set forth above regarding claim 16. Regarding claim 35, Huang teaches a base unit for wireless communication, comprising: at least one memory (Huang [0042]); and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the base unit (Huang [0042]) to: transmit a configuration to configure multiple maximum output power values in a bandwidth part (BWP) of a carrier of a serving cell based at least in part on the UE being indicated with a first Uplink (UL) or joint Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) state and a second UL or joint TCI state (Huang [Fig 13-1306 and 394] teaches configuring a UE with a plurality of SRS resource sets, power control parameters and Pcmax, wherein the resource sets, power control parameters and Pcmax are associated with a respective panel and used to determine transmission power on an active UL BWP of a carrier of a serving cell [0196]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 19-21, 24, 26-30 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Park (US 20230029850 A1); Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEAN TOKUTA whose telephone number is (571)272-5145. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 630-430. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Gillis can be reached at 5712727952. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SHEAN TOKUTA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2446 /SHEAN TOKUTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2446
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671640
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666420
INDICATING A SLOT OFFSET CORRESPONDING TO A DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665949
Method and Apparatus of Network Configuration for Internet-of-Things Device
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659093
TRANSMISSION USING AN ADAPTED DOWNLINK WAVEFORM TYPE
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652629
DRAN DISTRIBUTED UNIT DEPLOYMENT IN AN OPEN RAN ARCHITECTURE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 513 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month