Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/841,190

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INCREASING TOUCH RESPONSE SPEED

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Examiner
MISHLER, ROBIN J
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Honor Device Co., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 707 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 and 12-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park (US 2022/0206625) in view of Jung (US 2018/0150168). Regarding claim 1, Park discloses a method for increasing a touch response speed (para. 227), applied to an electronic device (fig. 1), wherein the electronic device comprises a touchscreen (see TSP in fig. 3), a touch chip (310, fig. 3B), and an application processor (320, fig. 3B), the touchscreen comprises a plurality of transmit channels (TE_TX in fig. 3B) and a plurality of receive channels (TE_RX in fig. 3B), and the method comprises: scanning, by the touch chip, one transmit channel group to obtain a touch data set (para. 191), wherein a quantity of transmit channels comprised in the transmit channel group is less than a quantity of all transmit channels of the touchscreen (para. 192-193), and the touch data set comprises parameters of equivalent capacitances between all receive channels and currently scanned transmit channels (para. 193, 105, 120-121); transmitting by the touch chip, the touch data set to the application processor (para. 193, 195), until all transmit channel groups are scanned (para. 196, 202); and sequentially receiving, by the application processor, touch data sets corresponding to the transmit channel groups (see fig. 9 and para. 202-203), until the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups are received, and then obtaining touch location information corresponding to a touch operation on the touchscreen (para. 103, 161, 217). Park fails to disclose wherein scanning the next transmit channel group partially overlaps with a touch transmission period of the touch data set. Jung discloses transmitting, by the touch chip, the touch data set to an application processor while scanning (see transmitting S30-1 while scanning S10-2 in fig. 6), by the touch chip a next transmit channel group (S10-2 in fig. 6) until all transmit channel groups are scanned (see Groups 1-3 in fig. 10), wherein the scanning the next transmit channel group (S10-2, fig. 6) and the transmitting the touch data set (S30-1, fig. 6) are performed in parallel such that a scanning period of the next transmit channel group at partially overlaps with the touch data transmission period of the touch data set (see fig. 6 wherein S30-1 and S10-2 partially overlap). When the invention was made (pre-AIA ) or before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include the teachings of Jung in the device of Park. The motivation for doing so would have been to have the data transmitting and touch scanning to reduce noise (Jung; para. 123) a to reduce the amount of time to determine a touch (Jung; para. 124). Ultimately to determine touch input puts more accurately and more efficiently. Regarding claim 2, Park discloses wherein the sequentially receiving, by the application processor, touch data sets corresponding to the transmit channel groups (see fig. 9 and para. 202-203), until the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups are touch data corresponding to all the transmit channels is received, and obtaining touch location information corresponding to a touch operation on the touchscreen (para. 103, 161, 217) comprises: after receiving a touch data set corresponding to one transmit channel group (para. 192-194), processing, by the application processor (para. 193, 216-217), the touch data set by using a touch data preprocessing algorithm (para. 217), until the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups are received (para. 216-217), and then obtaining, through calculation based on the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups channels, the touch location information corresponding to the touch operation (para. 217). Regarding claim 3, Park discloses wherein the transmitting, by the touch chip, the touch data set to the application processor ( para. 193, 195-196) comprises: performing, by the touch chip, compression processing on the touch data set by using a preset compression algorithm (see ENC_SENDATA in fig. 10 and para. 226-227), and transmitting compressed touch data to the application processor (see fig. 10; and the sequentially receiving, by the application processor, touch data sets corresponding to the transmit channel groups, until the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups (see fig. 9 and para. 202-203) are the touch data corresponding to all the transmit channels is received (para. 202-203), and obtaining touch location information corresponding to a touch operation on the touchscreen (para. 103, 161, 217) comprises: after receiving the compressed touch data, performing, by the application processor, decompression processing on the compressed touch data by using a preset decompression algorithm (see 1020, fig. 10 and para. 221, 225); and after receiving decompressed touch data corresponding to all the transmit channel groups, obtaining, by the application processor through calculation, the touch location information corresponding to the touch operation (para. 225). Regarding claim 4, Park discloses wherein the transmit channel group comprises one transmit channel (para. 191-192), and the touch data set is one piece of touch data obtained by scanning one transmit channel (para. 191-192); and the scanning, by the touch chip in a process of transmitting the touch data set to the application processor (para. 193, 195), a next transmit channel group until all transmit channel groups are scanned (para. 196, 202)comprises: in a process in which the touch chip transmits one piece of obtained touch data to the application processor (para. 191-192), continuing, by the touch chip, to scan a next transmit channel group until all the transmit channel groups are scanned (para. 202-203). Regarding claim 5, Park discloses wherein the transmit channel group comprises a plurality of transmit channels (para. 191-192), and the touch data set is one group of touch data obtained by scanning a plurality of transmit channels (para. 191-192); and the scanning, by the touch chip in a process of transmitting the touch data set to the application processor (para. 193, 195), a next transmit channel group until all transmit channel groups are scanned (para. 196, 202) comprises: in a process in which the touch chip transmits one group of obtained touch data to the application processor, sequentially scanning (para. 202-203), by the touch chip, transmit channels in a next transmit channel group, until all the transmit channel groups are scanned (para. 202-203); or in a process in which the touch chip transmits one group of obtained touch data to the application processor, simultaneously scanning (para. 191), by the touch chip, transmit channels in a next transmit channel group, until all the transmit channel groups are scanned (para. 202-203). Regarding claim 6, Park discloses wherein a touch drive module (720, fig. 10) and a touch algorithm module (see touch algorithm in para. 217) are run in the application processor (320); the transmitting, by the touch chip, the touch data set to the application processor comprises: transmitting, by the touch chip, the touch data set to the touch drive module (para. 193); and the sequentially receiving, by the application processor, touch data sets corresponding to the transmit channel groups (fig. 9 and para. 202-203), until the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups are received, and then obtaining touch location information corresponding to a touch operation on the touchscreen (para. 103, 161, 217) comprises: sequentially receiving, by the touch drive module, touch data sets corresponding to transmit channels (see fig. 9 and para. 202-203), and transmitting the touch data sets to the touch algorithm module (para. 161, 217); and sequentially receiving, by the touch algorithm module, the touch data sets corresponding to the transmit channels (see fig. 9 and para. 202-203), and obtaining, based on the touch data corresponding to all the transmit channels, the touch location information corresponding to the touch operation (para. 161, 103, 217). Regarding claim 7, Park discloses wherein the transmitting, by the touch chip, the touch data set to the touch drive module (para. 193) comprises: performing, by the touch chip, compression processing (see ENC_SENDATA in fig. 10 and para. 226-227) on the touch data set by using the preset compression algorithm, and transmitting compressed touch data to the touch drive module (see fig. 10); and the sequentially receiving, by the touch drive module, touch data sets corresponding to transmit channels, and transmitting the touch data sets to the touch algorithm module (see fig. 9 and para. 202-203) comprises: after receiving the compressed touch data, performing, by the touch drive module, decompression processing on the compressed touch data by using the preset decompression algorithm (see 1020, fig. 10 and para. 221, 225), and transmitting decompressed data to the touch algorithm module (para. 161, 217). Regarding claim 8, Park discloses wherein the sequentially receiving, by the touch algorithm module, the touch data sets corresponding to the transmit channels (see fig. 9 and para. 202-203), and obtaining, based on the touch data corresponding to all the transmit channels, the touch location information corresponding to the touch operation (para. 161, 217)comprises: after receiving a touch data set corresponding to one transmit channel group (para. 192-194), processing, by the touch algorithm module (para. 193, 216-217), the touch data set by using the touch data preprocessing algorithm, until the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups are received (para. 216-217), and then obtaining, through calculation based on the touch data sets corresponding to all the transmit channel groups channels, the touch location information corresponding to the touch operation (para. 217). Regarding claim 9, Park discloses wherein an input module (para. 77) and a first application (para. 31, 72) are run in the application processor (para. 31, 72; further wherein application on display device are conventional), and the method further comprises: transmitting, by the touch algorithm module, the touch location information to the input module by using the touch drive module (para. 4-5, 77); and transmitting, by the input module, the touch location information to the first application, so that the first application responds to the touch operation based on the touch location information, wherein the first application is an application that is run in the foreground of the electronic device (para. 4-5, 77, 2; wherein e.g. user input triggers applications on touch display). Claims 10 is rejected for the same reasons as claim 1. See above rejection. Claims 12-19 are rejected for the same reasons as stated for claims 2-9, respectively. See above rejections. Claims 20 is rejected for the same reasons as claim 1. See above rejection. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection. See new citations above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBIN J MISHLER whose telephone number is (571)270-7251. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00-5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NITIN PATEL can be reached on (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBIN J MISHLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 23, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598714
LOCKING STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596453
TOUCH SENSOR AND A METHOD FOR DETECTING A USER'S TOUCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585351
TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568688
DISPLAY DEVICE AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567184
VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month