Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/841,200

SPRING TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Examiner
DEUBLE, MARK A
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hs Products Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1009 granted / 1144 resolved
+36.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1164
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§102
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1144 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-7 and 10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 6, the word "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim 10 states that the channel is defined by channel “edge/spoke” portions of the placement member. It is unclear if the above quoted language should be construed as meaning edge or spoke poprtions, edge and spoke portions, or edge and/or spoke portions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 8-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Widmer et al. (WO 02/38304). In regard to claims 1 and 11, Widmer shows a transfer apparatus that transfers/conveys springs 3 from a spring forming station 1, at which springs are formed from a length of wire, to a pocketing station PS (see annotated figure 1 below), at which the springs are encased in pocketing material, in the manufacture of a pocketed spring unit. The transfer apparatus includes a conveyor 9 with spaced-apart belts 19’ that move together between the spring forming station 1 and the pocketing station PS. A placement member 13 introduces the springs 3 onto the conveyor 9. The placement member 13 includes a plurality of spring chambers 11 that temporarily retain a spring. The spring chambers 11 are arranged to rotate about a rotation axis 15. The placement member 13 is positioned with respect to the conveyor 9 so that during rotation of the placement member each spring chamber 11 passes at least partly between the moving belts 19’ and the spring 3 is captured by the belts 19’. In regard to claim 2, it can be seen in figure 1 that the rotation axis 15 is substantially parallel with an axis of the springs 3. PNG media_image1.png 798 848 media_image1.png Greyscale In regard to claim 3, the apparatus further includes a compression portion 133/133 arranged to compress the spring axially prior to capture of the spring by the belts (see figures 7-9). In regard to claim 4, the compression portion includes comprises a pair of spaced compression members 133/133 between which the spring is arranged to pass as the placement member rotates. In regard to claim 5, the compression members comprise a pair of plates 133/133 that are arranged to converge in the direction of movement of the spring (see the position of the plates 133/133 in figure 7 compared to the position of the plates 133/133 in figures 8-9). In regard to claim 8, the placement member 13 includes a plurality of spring chambers 11. The spring chambers 11 are spaced around a substantially circular path traced by the chambers during rotation of the placement member 13. In regard to claim 9, each chamber 11 includes a channel defined by shell segments 125/127/129. The channel extends substantially parallel with the rotation axis 15 and is substantially open at each end adjacent to the plates 133/133. In regard to claim 10, the channel is defined by channel edge/spoke portions ES of the placement member (see the annotated figure below). PNG media_image2.png 299 630 media_image2.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-7 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK A DEUBLE whose telephone number is (571)272-6912. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday flex schedule. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at 571-272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK A DEUBLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600572
MOTOR-DRIVEN CONVEYOR-ROLLER CONTROLLER, SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH A CONTROLLER AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A MOTOR ROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600602
CONNECTING GEAR MECHANISM OF A PASSENGER-TRANSPORTING SYSTEM DESIGNED AS AN ESCALATOR OR MOVING WALKWAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586934
MULTI-CONNECTION BRACKET AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583684
Conveyor Device With Transport Cassette
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570503
HANDRAIL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A HANDRAIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.1%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1144 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month